Recruiting

Max_Power

Junior
May 29, 2001
2,947
214
51
Collins recruits primarily top 100 players and it's a tough sell to convince a kid to come to NU to play at Allstate arena for a year for a team that has never made the NCAA with no real practice facility (I believe they are practicing at Patton next year). Might have more to sell the top recruits in the class of 2018.
 

corbi2961

Senior
Sep 9, 2005
30,524
786
0
Mark Smith from downstate is a big time recruit and we are very much in the thick of things. 247 has only one crystal ball prediction and the prediction is for NU.
 

Gocatsgo2003

All-Conference
Mar 30, 2006
46,626
2,992
78
Mark Smith from downstate is a big time recruit and we are very much in the thick of things. 247 has only one crystal ball prediction and the prediction is for NU.

While he seems like a good prospect, feels like we should be focusing more on big men... maybe that's the intent of the grad transfer route?
 

hdhntr1

All-Conference
Sep 5, 2006
37,228
1,075
113
While he seems like a good prospect, feels like we should be focusing more on big men... maybe that's the intent of the grad transfer route?
Especially since bigs take longer to develop. But have to remember, we have two coming back next year with 3 and4 years to play. I would guess it will be a focus for next year.
 

willycat

Junior
Jan 11, 2005
21,448
318
0
Mark Smith from downstate is a big time recruit and we are very much in the thick of things. 247 has only one crystal ball prediction and the prediction is for NU.
Isn't there also a possibility that a Carmody might appear in Evanston?
 

Medill90

Junior
Jan 30, 2011
6,910
321
0
While he seems like a good prospect, feels like we should be focusing more on big men... maybe that's the intent of the grad transfer route?

He's better than a good prospect. He may be player of the year in Illinois in a year that is a step up from 2016.

But your point is a solid one. I would add that I'm glad NU will be going after big men after the success of this year (versus last). Collins is an excellent recruiter and closer, but nothing like being the subject of the national news media and an NCAA tournament team.
 

Gocatsgo2003

All-Conference
Mar 30, 2006
46,626
2,992
78
Especially since bigs take longer to develop. But have to remember, we have two coming back next year with 3 and4 years to play. I would guess it will be a focus for next year.

You're thinking of Falzon and Ivanauskas (sp... never going to get that one right)? While I admittedly don't follow basketball or basketball recruiting as closely as football, I always thought of those two more as bigger wings rather than true "bigs."
 

PURPLECAT88

Senior
Feb 4, 2003
7,674
722
113
GCG, we really only have three guards who see action, and two of them will be gone after next year. Meanwhile we have 5 frontcourt players (Pardon, Benson, Law, Falzone and Ivanauskas) who have 2+ years of eligibility left. I think this is a year to go after guards. Big men for 2018.
 

Gocatsgo2003

All-Conference
Mar 30, 2006
46,626
2,992
78
GCG, we really only have three guards who see action, and two of them will be gone after next year. Meanwhile we have 5 frontcourt players (Pardon, Benson, Law, Falzone and Ivanauskas) who have 2+ years of eligibility left. I think this is a year to go after guards. Big men for 2018.

Don't necessarily disagree, but it never seems like NU can get "instant impact" big men so my thinking is that we might have to take one a year or two earlier than might be ideal.
 

IdahoAlum

Freshman
May 29, 2001
3,832
85
0
We offered several bigs this year, and were unsuccessful. Not getting a big wasn't by design. However, I'm sure Collins will pursue a transfer big.
 
Last edited:

Figrating

Redshirt
Dec 19, 2007
3,568
30
0
As NU's season improves, here's hoping more and more top recruits find NU a great opportunity. My hope is they crowd out grad transfers.
 

hdhntr1

All-Conference
Sep 5, 2006
37,228
1,075
113
You're thinking of Falzon and Ivanauskas (sp... never going to get that one right)? While I admittedly don't follow basketball or basketball recruiting as closely as football, I always thought of those two more as bigger wings rather than true "bigs."
Yes but at 6'8" sort of fit in multiple roles. .Not true bigs but... Got to also remember we have 2 more years of Pardon and 3 of Benson so we are not in bad position at this time. Guards were most important to replace this year as next year we lose both BMac and Lindsey to graduation
 

clarificationcat

Sophomore
Jan 25, 2005
3,301
183
52
You're thinking of Falzon and Ivanauskas (sp... never going to get that one right)? While I admittedly don't follow basketball or basketball recruiting as closely as football, I always thought of those two more as bigger wings rather than true "bigs."
I think Ivanauskas can develop into a true 4 if he can add some strength, hopefully in the off-season once his shoulder heals. He has a good chance to become a plus defender and rebounder because of his athleticism, length (he is a little taller than Pardon) and long arms. He's supposed to be a high energy guy and scouting reports that I have seen have been more positive on his defense than his offense. His outside shot is supposed to be the weakest part of his game. Falzon will probably never be a great defender or rebounder but he should be able to create mismatches at the 4 on offense. From what I saw his freshman year, he is not nearly as consistent from 3 as Taphorn (few are) but he can get his shot off more quickly and can carry the team when he is hot. If everyone is healthy, I envision next year's team being a little less of a lock-down defensive team and little more explosive offensively with the transition from Lumpkin to Skelly, Rap and sometimes Falzon.

I agree, though, that with Skelly graduating next year, the sooner we can add more size up front the better.
 

Medill90

Junior
Jan 30, 2011
6,910
321
0
A senior Tap is a more consistent shooter than the freshman Falzon. I wouldn't bet money against Falzon having the better shooting career. And any year Falzon has quicker feet and is a better defender.

Rap is a legit 6 9". He is a very crafty scorer from the free throw line in. And his distance shooting is getting there.
 

T_Levine

Redshirt
May 26, 2010
2,197
34
0
Next years team could well resemble the wiscy final four teams of a few years ago. Not saying same talent level. But on court makeup.

The key is growth of isiah as a point guard.
 

hdhntr1

All-Conference
Sep 5, 2006
37,228
1,075
113
I think Ivanauskas can develop into a true 4 if he can add some strength, hopefully in the off-season once his shoulder heals. He has a good chance to become a plus defender and rebounder because of his athleticism, length (he is a little taller than Pardon) and long arms. He's supposed to be a high energy guy and scouting reports that I have seen have been more positive on his defense than his offense. His outside shot is supposed to be the weakest part of his game. Falzon will probably never be a great defender or rebounder but he should be able to create mismatches at the 4 on offense. From what I saw his freshman year, he is not nearly as consistent from 3 as Taphorn (few are) but he can get his shot off more quickly and can carry the team when he is hot. If everyone is healthy, I envision next year's team being a little less of a lock-down defensive team and little more explosive offensively with the transition from Lumpkin to Skelly, Rap and sometimes Falzon.

I agree, though, that with Skelly graduating next year, the sooner we can add more size up front the better.
I don't disagree but we do have Benson taking that role next year and size at the wings potentially solidifying the 4 spot. So the bigger requirement for this years class is at the guard, small forward position and that is what we have and or are pursuing. I would guess there will be a big push for bigs in next years class. As far as Falzon not being as consistent as a Frosh as Tap has been as an upper class man, Tap was not as consistent as a Frosh either.
 

corbi2961

Senior
Sep 9, 2005
30,524
786
0
He's better than a good prospect. He may be player of the year in Illinois in a year that is a step up from 2016.

But your point is a solid one. I would add that I'm glad NU will be going after big men after the success of this year (versus last). Collins is an excellent recruiter and closer, but nothing like being the subject of the national news media and an NCAA tournament team.

Agreed, Mark Smith is big time from everything I've seen and heard. He is the kind of player you take no matter what your needs are. Collins can focus on Bigs next year.
 

clarificationcat

Sophomore
Jan 25, 2005
3,301
183
52
I don't disagree but we do have Benson taking that role next year and size at the wings potentially solidifying the 4 spot. So the bigger requirement for this years class is at the guard, small forward position and that is what we have and or are pursuing. I would guess there will be a big push for bigs in next years class. As far as Falzon not being as consistent as a Frosh as Tap has been as an upper class man, Tap was not as consistent as a Frosh either.
I wasn't suggesting that front court players should be our focus. We have historically struggled to find 4's, though, and if a really good one is available, I wouldn't necessary pass.

I don't think we would want to have Benson and Pardon on the floor that often if that's what you meant. They both need to play around the basket and I would think that it would affect our spacing and the flow of the offense.

As for Tap, I know he was not as consistent of a shooter as a freshman. He's shooting 45% from 3-point range this year, though and I don't expect that Falzon will be able to duplicate that (few can). Falzon is able to get his shot off more quickly and from well beyond the 3-point line. He will shoot more often than Tap with a higher degree of difficulty and, as result, likely have more 1-6 and 3-6 type nights. He's a better scorer than Tap; Tap is just very reliable in a more limited role.
 

Medill90

Junior
Jan 30, 2011
6,910
321
0
Just wanted to add....heard that NU has a major presence at every Mark Smith game.

Choice may be between NU and the Illini. With Groce likely gone may give NU a shot.
 

DaCat

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
25,501
1,885
113
I don't disagree but we do have Benson taking that role next year and size at the wings potentially solidifying the 4 spot. So the bigger requirement for this years class is at the guard, small forward position and that is what we have and or are pursuing. I would guess there will be a big push for bigs in next years class. As far as Falzon not being as consistent as a Frosh as Tap has been as an upper class man, Tap was not as consistent as a Frosh either.

Benson played well against Wiskey and should play a bigger role next year. I imagine going up against Pardon in practice every day is a good learning experience for him.

Falzon is more than just a 3-point shooter, he is athletic and can score around the rim. I'm really intrigued by Rap, he has length and seemingly a high basketball IQ. I agree that Smith or another point guard are higher priorities for this recruiting class.
 

scru

Redshirt
Sep 4, 2005
2,388
8
0
GCG, we really only have three guards who see action, and two of them will be gone after next year. Meanwhile we have 5 frontcourt players (Pardon, Benson, Law, Falzone and Ivanauskas) who have 2+ years of eligibility left. I think this is a year to go after guards. Big men for 2018.

this
 

hdhntr1

All-Conference
Sep 5, 2006
37,228
1,075
113
I wasn't suggesting that front court players should be our focus. We have historically struggled to find 4's, though, and if a really good one is available, I wouldn't necessary pass.

I don't think we would want to have Benson and Pardon on the floor that often if that's what you meant. They both need to play around the basket and I would think that it would affect our spacing and the flow of the offense.

As for Tap, I know he was not as consistent of a shooter as a freshman. He's shooting 45% from 3-point range this year, though and I don't expect that Falzon will be able to duplicate that (few can). Falzon is able to get his shot off more quickly and from well beyond the 3-point line. He will shoot more often than Tap with a higher degree of difficulty and, as result, likely have more 1-6 and 3-6 type nights. He's a better scorer than Tap; Tap is just very reliable in a more limited role.
It isn't but it could happen as well. More Pardon and Benson take care of the 5 and Skelly, Rap and Falzon dealing with the 4. Basically we have backup at every position, especially if we get someone like Smith to go along with Gaines.
 

catstime16

Redshirt
May 27, 2015
98
2
0
Would not be oppossed to a potential Grad transfer big guy to take load off of DP
and to some extent BB down low but also thrilled with staff and ability to develop
our own guys. Anxious to see what is in store for Benson, Ivanauskis and Falzon
over next 7/8 months. TRUST CHRIS COLLINS!
 

hdhntr1

All-Conference
Sep 5, 2006
37,228
1,075
113
Mark Smith from downstate is a big time recruit and we are very much in the thick of things. 247 has only one crystal ball prediction and the prediction is for NU.
If IL is our competition, obviously they are closer but looking at the programs, NU is on the way up and IL????? Not even sure if Groce is still the guy but if not, who is? And if he is, for how long???
 

catcrazy

Sophomore
Aug 5, 2001
3,779
126
62
I would not be surprised if the big we lost to IU decommits and becomes a Cat if Crean is fired
 

NJCat

All-Conference
Mar 7, 2016
21,326
1,501
113
I would not be surprised if the big we lost to IU decommits and becomes a Cat if Crean is fired

Well, they signed LOI's with Indiana, so IU would have to allow them to transfer within the Big 10. Highly unlikely.
 

Gocatsgo2003

All-Conference
Mar 30, 2006
46,626
2,992
78
Well, they signed LOI's with Indiana, so IU would have to allow them to transfer within the Big 10. Highly unlikely.

Players in those situations are typically released from their LOIs and therefore wouldn't be subject to transfer rules or restrictions.
 

hdhntr1

All-Conference
Sep 5, 2006
37,228
1,075
113
Players in those situations are typically released from their LOIs and therefore wouldn't be subject to transfer rules or restrictions.
Besides that, wouldn't Crean or his replacement have to figure out how to get rid of a guy or two still?
 
Aug 19, 2015
324
54
0
Besides that, wouldn't Crean or his replacement have to figure out how to get rid of a guy or two still?
That might be the most interesting thought of the day. If Crean is fired, what does the new guy do? Does he force players currently in the program out or does he drop players that have signed LOIs?