Refs for Cats vs Ole Miss
- Thread starter rick64
- Start date
Under Pope:
With Shows, we are 1-1 (win against brown, loss against osu)
With Anderson, 0-2 (uga & bama)
With Jarrett, 3-0 (Lipscomb, uf, a&m)
With Shows, we are 1-1 (win against brown, loss against osu)
With Anderson, 0-2 (uga & bama)
With Jarrett, 3-0 (Lipscomb, uf, a&m)
Shows is a total clown and Steven Anderson is either complete trash or has an issue with Kentucky specifically. Are you a troll or just a moron?
The Shows hate is just completely overblown. He hated Cal. He has nothing against UK. The made up vendettas that some people think refs have against UK is just exhausting. The ref excuse is just lame and for losers. Or morons.
I never really thought he was that bad against Cal. I just hated his showboating style.
Pat Adams is the worst official on accident and John Higgins is the worst on purpose.
You know beating UK is the most important day in any team sport in America. Someone name another sport that has a Super Bowl game every week. UK getting Embarrassed on Espn so it can pile on. Maybe beating S Carolina Saturday will make us feel good again.
We win 70% of our games when Shows officiates. The hate for him has always been overblown.
Our overall winning percentage is 76. So he's under that. I'm too lazy to look for officials that match or exceed that.
Shows sucks. He’s awful. Anderson ain’t much better but tolerable. Shows loves to railroad us.
Ahh ok. We win 7 out of 10 times with Shows, but posters say we have no chance. Got it!
Except it isnt. You’ll never ever convince me that game against UNC was officiated fairly. I mean for goodness sakes you had well known sports analaysts saying things like “Sure seems Kentucky is getting a raw deal” or similar phrases.
Sure most of the time refs are fine albeit screwy on some calls. But come on man. You’re par of a fan base that watched on of its players get stomped in the chest with no action taken. Of course we are sensitive to crappy officials.
I didn't say we have no chance; only that our winning percentage with Shows is below our overall average. There might be a legitimate reason for the difference. We may have a better than average percentage with other officials; I don't know. Maybe somebody can do the dirty work and do some multivariate statistics. It would be relatively straightforward to do.
Anderson:
| Overall UK Wins: 15 | Overall UK Losses: 8 | Win % 65.2 |
Shows:
| Overall UK Wins: 98 | Overall UK Losses: 42 | Win % 70 |
Jarret:
| Overall UK Wins: 33 | Overall UK Losses: 12 | Win % 73.3 |
| Overall UK Wins: 15 | Overall UK Losses: 8 | Win % 65.2 |
Shows:
| Overall UK Wins: 98 | Overall UK Losses: 42 | Win % 70 |
Jarret:
| Overall UK Wins: 33 | Overall UK Losses: 12 | Win % 73.3 |
Byron Jarrett is usually fair. Hope I am not eating those words in 2 hours.
I hate Anderson.
Looking at @FirewithFire post, that computes. Anderson a full 10 percentage points lower than our overall average, and Jarrett's is fairly close.
Maybe Shows hates guys that hit women more than UK. Hopefully.
When they hired Beard, they nearly renamed the school “Ole Mister”
I don’t think he’s anti-UK. He’s just not a good official. Years and years of watching him have led me to this conclusion. Misses calls all the time. Not consistent with his fouls. Tonight will be closer to the Georgia game than the Vandy/UT game. Just watch.
