The reasons we lost last night has nothing to do with officiating
This is what I don’t understand- why the complete inability to acknowledge that it was PART of the reason we lost
Someone else said above, in response to one of my posts, that the overall complaints about the officiating are overblown. Let’s assume that is true - we got away with an over-and-back and there was one late phantom call against UM.
So let’s assume the overall officiating evened out
So then we are only talking about the last possession where they looked the other way on TWO blatant violations -
which instead of giving us the ball (game over - we win) -
gave them an opportunity (they should NOT have had) to win the game
How can you say the officiating had “nothing to do” with the outcome ?!
A blown call (two actually) on the last possession
directly resulted in giving them a chance they should not have had
Come on - just be honest
I am conceding everything - that there were MYRIAD reasons why UM got back in the game AND, for the sake of discussion, I’ll agree that overall the officiating evened .
But you can’t even agree that the no calls on the last possession gave UM possession that they should NOT have had - which resulted in the loss.