Repeal the Second Amendment

Keyser76

Freshman
Apr 7, 2010
11,912
58
0
Link? Please link this one. I need to see it.
lmfao, who cares if these dumbasses wanna believe their ********, the military ain't no rebel flag waving bunch of country hicks, although I'm sure Brushy thinks everyone serving is a conservative Trump supporter in the military. I don't know if he is a Vet too, he didn't answer yesterday after he posted his stupid stolen valor meme.
 

Keyser76

Freshman
Apr 7, 2010
11,912
58
0
And they certainly don't look like a Louis Farrakhan and Kaerperdick rally or even all the anti-Trump rallies.
You wouldn't know would you? lol, actually they resemble them more than a Trump rally. I didn't know any Puerto Ricans, inner city blacks or Hispanic amigos until I served my Country for 10 years? You a vet? If so, Ok, if not, stfu cause you don't know what you are talking about.
 
Aug 27, 2001
63,466
198
0
lmfao, who cares if these dumbasses wanna believe their ********, the military ain't no rebel flag waving bunch of country hicks, although I'm sure Brushy thinks everyone serving is a conservative Trump supporter in the military. I don't know if he is a Vet too, he didn't answer yesterday after he posted his stupid stolen valor meme.

NO! I really want to see this study. It should entertain me for the rest of the afternoon!!!
 

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
47,208
3,286
113
Now no militia in the US today would stand a chance against the US military, so both sentiments are archaic and impractical actually, imo.
Let’s see here....

Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan, ISIS (when Obama is President), Syria, and basically anywhere else there is a dedicated insurgency. You just have to outlast the other guy’s stomach for loss.
 

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
47,208
3,286
113
They are sworn to protect our nation against all threats foreign and domestic. In a civil war they would be doing exactly that.
An overstepping Govt violating the Constitution by treading on the 2nd?

...uphold and defend the Constitution, against all enemies foreign and domestic.

The operative word in that oath is Constitution, not Govt.
 

Keyser76

Freshman
Apr 7, 2010
11,912
58
0
An overstepping Govt violating the Constitution by treading on the 2nd?

...uphold and defend the Constitution, against all enemies foreign and domestic.

The operative word in that oath is Constitution, not Govt.
Lol, ya'll got all three branches and wanna talk about your overthrow the Government fantasies, pretty amusing how frightened the "constitution" crowd gets when folks exercise the first amendment.
 

TarHeelEer

Freshman
Dec 15, 2002
89,304
53
48
Lol, ya'll got all three branches and wanna talk about your overthrow the Government fantasies, pretty amusing how frightened the "constitution" crowd gets when folks exercise the first amendment.

Your tribe calls Trump literally Hitler, yet want to give up your guns.
 

Boomboom521

Redshirt
Mar 14, 2014
20,115
6
0
Let’s see here....

Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan, ISIS (when Obama is President), Syria, and basically anywhere else there is a dedicated insurgency. You just have to outlast the other guy’s stomach for loss.
Really? None of those examples were state sponsored forces?
 

WhiteTailEER

Sophomore
Jun 17, 2005
11,534
170
0
An overstepping Govt violating the Constitution by treading on the 2nd?

...uphold and defend the Constitution, against all enemies foreign and domestic.

The operative word in that oath is Constitution, not Govt.

OK. And if the 2nd is repealed, they have to defend that version. The military didn't take up arms every time an amendment was added, so they shouldn't when one is repealed via our established processes.
 

Mntneer

Sophomore
Oct 7, 2001
10,192
196
0
OK. And if the 2nd is repealed, they have to defend that version. The military didn't take up arms every time an amendment was added, so they shouldn't when one is repealed via our established processes.

That's not a good comparison.

Taking up arms when rights are more clearly defined through adding amendments is not the same as striping right away.
 

bornaneer

All-Conference
Jan 23, 2014
30,933
1,635
113
You wouldn't know would you? lol, actually they resemble them more than a Trump rally. I didn't know any Puerto Ricans, inner city blacks or Hispanic amigos until I served my Country for 10 years? You a vet? If so, Ok, if not, stfu cause you don't know what you are talking about.
Yes....and yes I probably know more about that than you do...I just don't get into it and I won't after I ask you one question.....Were you ever spit at while walking down High Street in Morgantown.....If not you can shut the *** up.
 

WhiteTailEER

Sophomore
Jun 17, 2005
11,534
170
0
That's not a good comparison.

Taking up arms when rights are more clearly defined through adding amendments is not the same as striping right away.

Define: "stripping a right away" for me then, as you see it. Because it would still take a Constitutional Amendment to remove a previous provision.

My point is ... if that was done, and the process was followed that removed the 2nd amendment (and this is kind of a waste of time discussing becuase it won't happen in our lifetimes), the military would be bound by oath to defend the new version of the constitution and would be fighting against those that start whatever civil war because it was removed.

If there is some kind of uprising to have it removed outside of our governmental process, then the military would be duty bound to fight against them.
 

30CAT

All-American
May 29, 2001
171,160
5,050
113
Damn......add another one to completely off the reservation list. There won't be a civil war. If we didn't fight one in the 60's and 70's it will never happen.

I didn't say there would be a civil war. I merely replied to a post from someone who mentioned one.
 

30CAT

All-American
May 29, 2001
171,160
5,050
113
Removing it as a right wouldn't remove it as a privilege ... and nobody would be coming to confiscate your guns.

But it isn't a privilege and it is a right. Why take away the right? What Constitutional right would be next on the chopping block?
 

WhiteTailEER

Sophomore
Jun 17, 2005
11,534
170
0
But it isn't a privilege and it is a right. Why take away the right? What Constitutional right would be next on the chopping block?

I'm not saying I agree with it ... but removing at a right, would make it easier to better regulate the sale of them.
 

MountaineerWV

Sophomore
Sep 18, 2007
26,324
191
0
But it isn't a privilege and it is a right. Why take away the right? What Constitutional right would be next on the chopping block?

I can ask this: What makes the 2nd special? The 1st and 4th have been attacked and restricted in the past.......and the 4th done as a result of "national security" following 9/11 by Republican leadership.......
 

30CAT

All-American
May 29, 2001
171,160
5,050
113
I can ask this: What makes the 2nd special? The 1st and 4th have been attacked and restricted in the past.......and the 4th done as a result of "national security" following 9/11 by Republican leadership.......

As an Independent, I couldn't agree more...but from where I'm sitting, the far left's attack on the 1st Amendment dwarfs anything the right is doing.
 

30CAT

All-American
May 29, 2001
171,160
5,050
113
I'm not saying I agree with it ... but removing at a right, would make it easier to better regulate the sale of them.

More government control. Give up the right and we may as well hand all of our guns over to the government.
 

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
47,208
3,286
113
Lol, ya'll got all three branches and wanna talk about your overthrow the Government fantasies, pretty amusing how frightened the "constitution" crowd gets when folks exercise the first amendment.
I was merely correcting his assertion, I don’t think it would be the right to go down that road. Last I checked, the Right wasn’t clamoring for Calexit, that’s yo bunch of crazies.
 

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
47,208
3,286
113
OK. And if the 2nd is repealed, they have to defend that version. The military didn't take up arms every time an amendment was added, so they shouldn't when one is repealed via our established processes.
Agree with that.
 

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
47,208
3,286
113
Really? None of those examples were state sponsored forces?
You really think places like China and Russia wouldn’t be funneling arms into a civil war here? Seriously? In all but one of those examples (Nam), it was just an insurgent force.
 

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
47,208
3,286
113
I can ask this: What makes the 2nd special? The 1st and 4th have been attacked and restricted in the past.......and the 4th done as a result of "national security" following 9/11 by Republican leadership.......
Oh blow the partisanship out your ***. Oshithead was conducting bulk surveillance on the entirety of the country and could have easily gotten rid of the Patriot Act. I would have supported him had he done so, he didn’t, so you fvckers are just as culpable if not more so.
 

MountaineerWV

Sophomore
Sep 18, 2007
26,324
191
0
Oh blow the partisanship out your ***. Oshithead was conducting bulk surveillance on the entirety of the country and could have easily gotten rid of the Patriot Act. I would have supported him had he done so, he didn’t, so you fvckers are just as culpable if not more so.

Didn't know that the PATRIOT Act was put in by Democrat leadership in the White House........thanks for clarifying that for me......
 

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
47,208
3,286
113
Didn't know that the PATRIOT Act was put in by Democrat leadership in the White House........thanks for clarifying that for me......
Oh, make no mistake, that **** came by way of a GOP led effort and was supported almost unanimously by the Dems, Feingold being the lone Nay. Had I been there, I would have also voted Nay. No comment on your party’s unwillingness to get rid of it I see. Typical.
 

30CAT

All-American
May 29, 2001
171,160
5,050
113
If you want an assault weapon, join the military...........problem solved.

Who defines an "assault weapon?"

Do you know what one is?

In fact, will you make an attempt to define one?
 
Last edited:

30CAT

All-American
May 29, 2001
171,160
5,050
113
Sad thing is, a lot of the anti-gunners know nothing about guns.

"Assault weapon"....many anti-gunners can't define one

"Magazine"..."Clip"...Many anti-gunners don't know the difference

"The Second Amendment"...Many anti-gunners have no clue what it's about

"Guns"...Many anti-gunners don't realize guns can't hurt anyone

"Gun laws"...Many anti-gunners don't realize most tragedies would be prevented if current laws were enforced

"New gun laws/bans"...Many anti-gunners don't realize if current laws/bans aren't enforced, new gun laws/bans won't accomplish anything different

Many anti-gunners are so blinded by party hatred, they don't see the threat to our freedoms.
 

Mntneer

Sophomore
Oct 7, 2001
10,192
196
0
I can ask this: What makes the 2nd special? The 1st and 4th have been attacked and restricted in the past.......and the 4th done as a result of "national security" following 9/11 by Republican leadership.......

Simple logic should answer that question for you.

What's the most important right in any truly free country? The right to speak out about, and maybe against, that country.

What's the next most important right in any truly free country? The ability to protect that first right.