No. How you take it is on you. I communicate perfectly fine. You just look for anyway to deflect to satisfy you superiority complex. You know we were talking about one specific instance at PF but you deliberately brought in another instance to feed your ego. You do it every single time.
Riley Gaines / Joe Rogan
- Thread starter jlock7614
- Start date
That's all you care about. Not the women being subjected to this behavior. You have proven along with your quotations of the word man that you believe "he" is a woman because he feels that way.
All dems do is protect criminals and mentally ill. Never the ppl actually being victimized.
Did the sign say women's locker room or unisex? If a woman walks into a room designated for both would be one thing. But no she walked into a room she thought was a safe space for her. Instead she got someone like you walking around naked in her space. What about her rights.
An illegal alien criminal rapes and kills a young girl and the media rushes to change the designation of the illegal and why they are here to begin with rather than child who was raped.
We shouldn't call cartel member killers by what they are because it's mean. We shouldn't call out crazy men for walking around women's locker rooms naked cause it's mean. But your filth is never worried about the actual ppl being victimized. You don't actually care about the filming either because you actually believe he is a she and should be there. You just won't admit it because it exposes your own mental problems.
So you say some dumb **** like ...huh Trump.
All dems do is protect criminals and mentally ill. Never the ppl actually being victimized.
Did the sign say women's locker room or unisex? If a woman walks into a room designated for both would be one thing. But no she walked into a room she thought was a safe space for her. Instead she got someone like you walking around naked in her space. What about her rights.
An illegal alien criminal rapes and kills a young girl and the media rushes to change the designation of the illegal and why they are here to begin with rather than child who was raped.
We shouldn't call cartel member killers by what they are because it's mean. We shouldn't call out crazy men for walking around women's locker rooms naked cause it's mean. But your filth is never worried about the actual ppl being victimized. You don't actually care about the filming either because you actually believe he is a she and should be there. You just won't admit it because it exposes your own mental problems.
So you say some dumb **** like ...huh Trump.
You say enough dumbshit for the entire fan base as evidenced by this rambling post. I’d stop if I were you. Go back to worrying about Michelle Obama’s crotch. That’s about the only level you fit on. It’s clear your village lost their idiot.
It’s so sad that you are so bad at this since you try so hard. It is obviously not your thing. Sorry sport.
Haven’t asked. Knowing it is illegal was what I was concerned with. If you want the actual krs statute or whatever, that’s on you.
KRS? Are you still claiming to talk about the Alaska incident?
Was she prosecuted? If not, why not? You have called her a “criminal,” but are you just slandering her or do you know if she actually broke a law and was prosecuted?
You seem to dislike biological women with your accusations of criminal acts and denying corroborating testimonies from the women all while refusing to say whether you think male genitalia should be in a woman’s locker room.
I used that as a generic statement about statutes because I live in KY. Idk what they are called in Alaska or any other states. You again nitpick to one word just like I said you do. You proved me right.
The rest of your post is complete and utter nonsense not worthy of any sort of response.
Sure bud. Let me interpret for those who don’t speak Dodgese, you don’t really know what the crap you’re talking about, so when challenged, you deflect and play victim. Gotcha, boss. You keep going, King Rabbit Hole.
You know dodgese because that’s all you know how to do is deflect and dodge. The rest is utter nonsense. You know no better with your head so far up your ***.
Let’s see what other thing you try to nitpick on to feed your sociopathic ego.
You are right. You got nothing. I’m glad you finally realized it.
It’s so sad that you are so bad at this since you try so hard. It is obviously not your thing. Sorry sport.
Ah look. Aren’t smart enough to come up with stuff on your own so you steal mine. Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. I’m glad you recognize that you are a follower and not a leader. You leading would do no one any good. Nice try though pumpkin.
I think something like 53% of women under 50 are on some form of mental drug or counseling.... that's nuts/
How do you feel about males going to female prisons if they identify as women? Lets say they've actually been pretending to be female before they were convicted.
Don’t expect him to actually discuss the topics of this thread. King Rabbit Hole came in with a non sequitur to blame and attack a woman victim when he has few facts and doesn’t trust law enforcement to do their job. He says that the woman should have gone and told management or the police what was going on, rather than photograph or video the man undressing in a women’s locker room, calling her a criminal. Then, he said he does not believe women who say Lia Thomas displayed his junk unless they have video proof or some proof other than their words, because he knows women lie. LOL! The disconnect is patent to everyone but the Rabbit Hole King.
He spins incessantly and does not know what his own words mean, but will blame you for taking him at his statements, as he wrote them. We should all know when he doesn’t really mean what he posts!!! How dare us actually respond to what he says!! We should know what he meant, which only miraculously appears after we show the ridiculousness and falseness of his posts.
I’ve asked one particular question that has never been answered. Like I’ve said multiple times, when you all start answering my questions I’ll start answering yours. I haven’t made up a law so it’s you who doesn’t know anything. You could replace your screen name with 5 or 6 others and not know which different ******* it is.
Thanks for your continued posts Captain spin job. There is no one on this board who spins more than you. What is the next word you are going to focus on and dissect. Let me know when you get your head out of your ***. Since you are ok with it, let me know the next time your family is in a locker room. I’ll send a female acquaintance in to video them since there is nothing wrong with it. I’ll do it for bigbluenation as well since it’s ok to him as well.
You asked if people thought the person videoing a man in a women’s locker room should be prosecuted.
Everyone asked what law was broken.
You can’t give an answer.
So if you can’t point to any actual law that was broken, why would anyone think someone should be prosecuted?
Explain what specific law you think was broken, and why, and maybe people will tell you if they agree with you that the law was broken.
Sorry for pointing out your blatant inconsistencies and false statements. You are an incoherent mess.
Blah blah blah. There are no inconsistencies. You just lack the basic comprehension to do anything more than focus on a single word to feed your ego. You’re either a sociopath or a psychopath. Just let me know when they go to a locker room so I can let my friend know so she can go video them since that’s ok in your eyes.
I never cease to be amazed just how depraved liberalism can truly be. Some call themselves " progressives", when what they really are in fact are regressive . They're destroying the moral fabric of the nation, all in the name of the lunatic fringe. There is no upside in allowing biological men to infringe upon biological women, except for the biological male.
And of course liberals are, once again, simply throwing women, and THEIR rights, down the drain. And yes, anyone who has gender dysphoria is a mentally ill person, it's just common sense; something that, once again they flush away .
And of course liberals are, once again, simply throwing women, and THEIR rights, down the drain. And yes, anyone who has gender dysphoria is a mentally ill person, it's just common sense; something that, once again they flush away .
Why of course it's "utter nonsense" to you, but for those of us who value morality, it's normal thought.
Like a broken record. Ok. Let me know when your family is in a locker room and I’ll have my friend record them as well
Since you are ok with it. Anyone using the screen name Bill Cosby has zero credibility when it comes to what is right or wrong let alone against the law.
You aren’t the morality police. I would venture to guess my moral compass is much higher than yours.
This like the fourth or fifth time I have stated this, and most of those you despise on this thread have said the same, if she broke a law, we are fine with her being prosecuted. How does even your little brain not get that?
My question wasn’t did she break the law. You always preface it with if. My question was directed to you and what your specific opinion is. Do you think she should be prosecuted (or even just held accountable for filming someone in a locker room)? It’s a simple yes or no which you refuse to actually say. This is the first time you have said that you are fine with her being prosecuted but that still doesn’t say whether or not you think she should be which is what the actual question was. How does your little brain get that?
Well, I'm on the side of women who have a reasonable expectation of privacy , not some dude who pretends to be a woman.
And no, that woman should not be prosecuted for filming evidence of a man in her locker room. Good God, I honestly can't believe this is even a debatable issue.
So it’s only an issue if they can tell someone is trans.
Congrats to you for being the first person to answer the actual question as asked. Where does that stop? What happens when a masculine looking woman is accused of being a man? What about her privacy?
Let’s point out some more inconsistencies in your ridiculous posting. You say she broke a law, but cannot state the law so we can read it to actually apply the few facts we know to the law to see IF she even broke the law. Next, YOU admitted more than once, that there exist undefined “circumstances” where you believe the law you cannot cite would permit her to video another (suggesting videoing a rape in the locker room would be permissible, but not saying what other factors YOU would accept, let alone the unknown law).
If you had any legal training at all, you would know that first you need to know IF there is a law. Then, you need to know the elements of the law. And, then, you need to know all of the facts to apply the facts to the elements to even see if a law was violated. Finally, there is prosecutor discretion, which you seem to agree with when you admit there are justifiable “circumstances” where even you would let a woman video in the locker room, if that is a violation of an Alaska statute.
So, the fact that people cannot say whether they would prosecute is TOTALLY justified. You are the one evading the issues in this thread over an issue that is not relevant for the purpose of having false outrage against those with whom you disagree.
Let’s point out some more inconsistencies in your ridiculous posting. You say she broke a law, but cannot state the law so we can read it to actually apply the few facts we know to the law to see IF she even broke the law. Next, YOU admitted more than once, that there exist undefined “circumstances” where you believe the law you cannot cite would permit her to video another (suggesting videoing a rape in the locker room would be permissible, but not saying what other factors YOU would accept, let alone the unknown law).
If you had any legal training at all, you would know that first you need to know IF there is a law. Then, you need to know the elements of the law. And, then, you need to know all of the facts to apply the facts to the elements to even see if a law was violated. Finally, there is prosecutor discretion, which you seem to agree with when you admit there are justifiable “circumstances” where even you would let a woman video in the locker room, if that is a violation of an Alaska statute.
So, the fact that people cannot say whether they would prosecute is TOTALLY justified. You are the one evading the issues in this thread over an issue that is not relevant for the purpose of having false outrage against those with whom you disagree.
Live look at caveman as usual since he wants to dissect everything.
No, it's actually only an issue if it's a man, period. Doesn't matter if he walks in wearing a tutu or a business suit, a man, a biological male, should never enter a woman's locker room.
And, by the way liar, I have said many times, if she broke the law, prosecute her. You’re such a doof, you responded that I was suggesting YOU prosecute. Which is irrelevant, because the foundation is the same. This is not the deep end of the pool and, yet, you are still drowning.
Live look at caveman as usual since he wants to dissect everything.
Once again, when you cannot respond, you offer nothing. You are not very smart.