Rucci and parents on campus today…

ILLINOISLION

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
1,574
2,996
113
Yeah. The center that skipped nearly every snap off the turf in the Rose Bowl.

He’ll probably help UMich beat tOSU with his snaps next November too…..he always wanted to be a Michigan Man and just going about it in a new way.
 

wbcbus

All-Conference
Oct 8, 2021
1,337
2,760
113
I know Rucci didn’t have the results everyone expected as a 5 star recruit. However, he’s spent 3 seasons in a major college football weight room, film room, and practice field. I saw a few snaps he played in their bowl game after the starter got hurt and he looked pretty good. I think he may be the OT in the portal that would be the best fit and I think he might be ready for a much bigger role wherever he lands. I’d feel a lot better about him coming to PSU than the kid that briefly committed and then ended up at MD.

Obviously saying walk-on is absurd, but I also think folks need to temper their expectations. Lots of people citing the 5* status from years ago, but he's already proven he didn't live up to that status. He's certainly valuable depth though, and worth a scholarship, I just don't see him necessarily being an impact player.
 

Connorpozlee

All-American
Aug 29, 2013
2,687
5,143
113
The stars earned while playing against other high school kids and competing in summer football camps are useless once the kid steps foot on a college practice field. For all players, but in particular for lineman I think.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nitt1300

EricStratton-RushChairman

All-Conference
May 20, 2005
1,784
4,683
113
I think what is lost in all the banter here (Grim's nonsense notwithstanding), is that he and his dad think Nolan will get coached up better his last two years here, giving him a real chances to fully develop and possible follow Todds footsteps to NFL. Maybe it's a scheme issue/difference between the two HCs
 

Nits74

All-Conference
May 14, 2010
1,165
1,871
113
Ohio State has more issues than PSU right now. They’ve lost all confidence in their coach and had nearly 20 kids transfer out including the starting QB who left before the season even ended. Not a good look.
Despite this, we'll find a way to lose to them.
 

psykim

All-Conference
Jun 3, 2001
3,775
4,839
113
Spring practice at OL and WR-and a few other spots should be very exciting-to see how prospects and transfers first develop (and who does not).
 

PSUFTG2

All-Conference
Jul 1, 2023
700
1,569
93
The goal is to maximize your roster, not make arbitrary comparisons to others teams' units/transfers. You don't "lose ground" by improving your OL room, and Rucci does that. Playing time aside, he is a good player with some valuable college experience and a high ceiling.
Keep in mind:

PSU is around 10-12 over the 85 limit already - ie, 10-12 kids will need to be cut between now and this summer.
Every kid added through the portal means yet another kid needs to be cut.... it is not a game of "every add is a plus", since every add requires someone else to be cut.
Would this player add more to the roster than the guy who gets cut? Who knows?

You also have the less immediate impact of whether it helps or hurts a program to become known as the place where guys are cut loose if they don't provide enough value. That is a trickier question.

Of course, the NCAA and her member institutions could have avoided this problem - and many others - simply by having a single moment of collective common sense at any time over the last 20 years. (Seriously).
That would have required them to actually care about the whole "student-athlete" bit, of course. Something that, obviously, they never cared a lick about. (Also, seriously)
 

psuro

Heisman
Aug 24, 2001
8,716
18,922
113

This list shows 98/85, so 13 over the limit This does not include Rucci, so 99/85. Cephas (who committed to Minny) is not on it, nor is the recent Wisky LB - so 100/85 is where I think it is.

My take to portal out/processed based solely on throwing crap against the wall to see what sticks....

Meiga
Achumba
Traori
Townley (he did before)
Elsdon
Sahadayk
Smolik
Ivey
Johnson
Cross
Vilbert
Clifford
Artis

That leaves 2 more....
 

CbusLion

Junior
Oct 28, 2021
223
297
63
Keep in mind:

PSU is around 10-12 over the 85 limit already - ie, 10-12 kids will need to be cut between now and this summer.
Every kid added through the portal means yet another kid needs to be cut.... it is not a game of "every add is a plus", since every add requires someone else to be cut.
Would this player add more to the roster than the guy who gets cut? Who knows?

You also have the less immediate impact of whether it helps or hurts a program to become known as the place where guys are cut loose if they don't provide enough value. That is a trickier question.
The fact that Penn State is bringing him in tells you he is expected to add more value than a kid who gets cut. Penn State was not forced to take him, and they're aware of scholarship limitations.

Are you assuming that he's being "cut loose" at Wisconsin for not performing? Looks to me like he was the backup left tackle as a RS soph. Starter was Jack Nelson, 3-yr starter, 5star by 247, 6'7" 311lb RS Junior, projects as a 3rd round pick.
 

GrimReaper

All-American
Oct 12, 2021
6,419
8,873
113

This list shows 98/85, so 13 over the limit This does not include Rucci, so 99/85. Cephas (who committed to Minny) is not on it, nor is the recent Wisky LB - so 100/85 is where I think it is.

My take to portal out/processed based solely on throwing crap against the wall to see what sticks....

Meiga
Achumba
Traori
Townley (he did before)
Elsdon
Sahadayk
Smolik
Ivey
Johnson
Cross
Vilbert
Clifford
Artis

That leaves 2 more....
The "Wisky LB" is coming in as a walk on.
 

GrimReaper

All-American
Oct 12, 2021
6,419
8,873
113
The fact that Penn State is bringing him in tells you he is expected to add more value than a kid who gets cut. Penn State was not forced to take him, and they're aware of scholarship limitations.

Are you assuming that he's being "cut loose" at Wisconsin for not performing? Looks to me like he was the backup left tackle as a RS soph. Starter was Jack Nelson, 3-yr starter, 5star by 247, 6'7" 311lb RS Junior, projects as a 3rd round pick.
Tyler Beach was the Badgers LT in 2021. Nelson was shifted to LT in 2022 after being the starter at RG in 2021.
 

blion72

All-Conference
Oct 30, 2021
1,579
1,199
113

This list shows 98/85, so 13 over the limit This does not include Rucci, so 99/85. Cephas (who committed to Minny) is not on it, nor is the recent Wisky LB - so 100/85 is where I think it is.

My take to portal out/processed based solely on throwing crap against the wall to see what sticks....

Meiga
Achumba
Traori
Townley (he did before)
Elsdon
Sahadayk
Smolik
Ivey
Johnson
Cross
Vilbert
Clifford
Artis

That leaves 2 more....
why didn't more of these people hit the portal so they could transfer in the spring to get a new start?

clearly this cut will be bigger than normal.
 

PSUJam

Heisman
Oct 7, 2021
12,038
21,941
113
why didn't more of these people hit the portal so they could transfer in the spring to get a new start?

clearly this cut will be bigger than normal.
The answer to this is taxing. Carry on.
 

Madsol

Senior
Dec 6, 2002
404
808
93
"Valuable college experience" = 70 snaps in three years.
As for "maximizing your (sic) roster" Rucci is taking away a scholarship from someone already at PSU, and potentially a 2025 prospect.
Why would you put (sic) after your in his quoted post? Your is correct. And who the heck uses (sic) on a freaking football message board?
 

GrimReaper

All-American
Oct 12, 2021
6,419
8,873
113
Why would you put (sic) after your in his quoted post? Your is correct. And who the heck uses (sic) on a freaking football message board?
"Sic" is used to denote that a word is quoted exactly as written. Probably should have put another one after "maximizing," too. Happier now?
 

Madsol

Senior
Dec 6, 2002
404
808
93
"Sic" is used to denote that a word is quoted exactly as written. Probably should have put another one after "maximizing," too. Happier now?
"Sic" is used when there is an error in what you're quoting and you want to point out the error is in the original and not in your quote. There was no error in what you quoted.
 

GrimReaper

All-American
Oct 12, 2021
6,419
8,873
113
"Sic" is used when there is an error in what you're quoting and you want to point out the error is in the original and not in your quote. There was no error in what you quoted.
Odd or erroneous. To whom does "your" refer?