Seeding Committe

[RUTrack94]

Finish at .500 or above. Lock For tourney.

2-2 gets the team to 19-12 (11-9) and worse they finish is 19-13

 

[RU-ROCS]

There’s 0 percent chance that happens

0%? Let me guess. You never took statistics?

 

[fluoxetine]

You know how I know you’re a troll besides the brand new account and annoying handle? You don’t say “us” or “we” - you say “Rutgers” and “they”. You ain’t a fan, a real fan - you’re a lame troll, and not particularly clever or good at it.

Lol this guy is so bad at trolling it’s amazing. He comes back, makes a new handle, and immediately starts reacting to and/or disagreeing with AreYouNuts posts. He always has his full profile blocked. He’s been doing this **** forever and has possibly been banned 100+ times. It’s insane in a quite literal sense.

 

[motorb54]

It’s simple guys, beat good team, don’t lose to bad ones, and finish with a good record.
That’s pretty much it.

Biazza is right.
Hmmm! Beat good teams. Like at Purdue. Like at Northwestern. Like Indiana.
Seems having wins over the current top three teams in our conference is beating good teams.
Don't know why the OP doesn't see that. Posts like he thinks he is an expert.

 

[Colbert17!]

According to Brad Wachtel the seeding Committe put a big emphasis on bad losses, KPI rating and SOS while putting less emphasis on predictive metrics. Not great news.

Link???