There are 1.3M active military personnel right now.Maybe, but just don't see it ever happening. Too many people would be against the idea.
No. Waste of money.
National Guard or some sort of reserve duty maybe for a couple of years but, you would still have a large portion of Americans who would find a way not to serve so, the 10 million would be cut a lot.There are 1.3M active military personnel right now.
There are more than 10M males between the ages of 20-24 in this country.
People would be against this idea because it's dumb.
Now, some sort of "national service" obligation? Maybe. Serving on active duty? No way.
Then, I need to run for office. I am sure I would get Deee's vote afterall, all I would have to do is lie at every turn.I think to hold political office and especially the presidency, you should have actually served in the military.
(those children of promise but without the necessary means for a...necessary means for a higher education).
No, but I do believe that serving at least 2 years should be a requirement on the path to citizenship for immigrants.
Sounds like the perfect candidate for disarming land mines.Seriously? You think putting a 60 year old woman from Vietnam into two years of military service is a good idea?
Then, I need to run for office. Iam sure I would get Deee's vote afterall, all I would have to do is lie at every turn.
Honestly, how would you know? You have been duped for a long time now and don't know it. And, if you do know it, that makes you one of the worst kind of Americans. Self serving and deviant.You're pretty good at that already.
Maybe, but have you seen it lately? It is in pretty bad shape now. Between the PC police, extended wars, and dwindling man power, it is in pretty bad shape.The military would suffer it's worst demise if it was required to find a place for each of the lazy offspring from each of our social classes, from the wealthiest to the poorest, from the sprawling estates to the project slums where the primary purpose is to eat, sleep and reproduce and to teach more generations to do the same, but even worse yet is that the military would suffer the most unfair consequence of all - to be required to find a purpose for the offspring of persons who had achieved more than 25 thousand posts on an internet message board.cheers to the 173d and the 503.
That's right. Give the government a chance to brainwash/condition/indoctrinate every male in this country. Two thumbs up.
Agree. Our commander in chief should have military experienceI think to hold political office and especially the presidency, you should have actually served in the military.
If they thought Iraq was a good idea then they need to think a little harder. Same goes for pretty much all of our military involvement post WWII.Only if you let them. They actually try to get you to think and LEAD. If your take is to be brainwashed.....you already are... Be Good
Agree. Our commander in chief should have military experience