But Carmody didn’t. And Collins did. You can play your hypothetical games all day long. The facts don’t lie.
Did I mention Collins led NU to a victory over Vanderbilt in the NCAA tournament? That’s another fact.
Seem to recall people talking up injuries in order to give CC a pass on the recent struggles (not to say that it doesn't factor in, but to a certain point).
And the Fact remains that CC has yet to do so entirely with his own recruits will eventually do so, but as of yet, hasn't even made any postseason).
But as I had stated before, Phillips should have made the change earlier, and while BC would have kept a higher floor, there are limits to the PO system, and another coach (whether it be CC or someone else) would have a higher ceiling.
Thought the notion that BC would never have broken thru was silly (came as close as the program had ever done at that juncture), but didn't see anything beyond the Sweet 16.
A diff system with at least avg. B1G talent (upperclass-laden) could make a deeper run.
Why would the Lakers running the PO impact their defensive rebounding?
I know nothing about the Lakers running the PO but I'll venture why the rebounding sucked (a stat of which I am also unaware). The key is in your questions..."for a short while."
"For a short while" tells me it didn't work. In the NBA, that means the players rejected it. Which means they were unenthused about the system and coaching. Which is why the coach was fired before T'Giving.
Whether or not they were enthused by the PO didn't mean they stopped trying to pad their own stats for their own benefit.
They didn't seem to fall short when it came to scoring; for the 2012-13 season, the Lakers averaged more than 100 ppg whereas the season prior, they averaged in the 90s.