Sherrone Moore fired

Jun 26, 2025
876
769
93
True. This is page 5 and nothing yet said about the suffering his wife and 3 girls must endure. He has destroyed innocent lives. Also, consider the coaches and their families who will now be uprooted at Christmas. I hope he finds conviction, repentance and salvation.

And whose fault is that??? Maybe if the scUM administration cared more about winning the right way instead of winning regardless of means or cost, there wouldn't be so many paying the price.
 

1995PSUGrad

All-Conference
Nov 16, 2019
768
1,130
93
I just said the very same thing to my wife. That has to be exactly what went through his head these last two nights he spent in jail..... The gal broke it off with him and he went nuts... He will regret it the rest of his life.
There is the personal part but there is also the career part. This is what he spent his life working toward and he reached the top of his profession, so to speak. Now his coaching career is most likely (at least should be) over. Once all the dust settles, what is his first job interview going to be like? What is he going to do the rest of his life?
 

razpsu

Heisman
Jan 13, 2004
13,882
13,853
113
To many conflicting stories with with Michigan, Moore and girl. Michigan will have to collaborate to get one story out there.
 

PAgeologist

All-Conference
Oct 19, 2021
1,300
2,589
113
Ann Arbor has a culture problem

Anne Arbor has a coutoure problem.
infomercial GIF
Anne Arbor apparently isn't the only ***** in Ann Arbor.
 

Montcolion

Redshirt
May 2, 2005
11
22
3
Her extremely high profile supervisor used his influence over her to sleep with her. She is a victim and will be suing the sh*t out of the university. I can assure you she will be pointing out all of the institutional failures that led to this result, including the substantial, abnormal pay raise she received. She has been Lewinskied and her life is (at least temporarily) ruined. It is a sad situation for all involved and it should be left at that.

That being said, how can PSU take advantage? :)
That’s basically the status of things now but it’s a bad progression of the law. A 31 year old woman knows what she doing. Can always say no and if targeted, that’s what the law was meant to address. Not someone that goes along with it then regrets it. She should not be rewarded.
 

Montcolion

Redshirt
May 2, 2005
11
22
3
Unless she was a minor, her age has no relevance. What is relevant is that her high profile supervisor used his influence to sleep with her. She was inherently vulnerable regardless of age.
We don’t even know that she didn’t initiate it. Frankly, that’s more likely that a single thirty something girl latched on to a (then) very successful man. Then regretted it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bison13 and FK3JM

FK3JM

Junior
Oct 31, 2021
147
320
63
Her extremely high profile supervisor used his influence over her to sleep with her. She is a victim and will be suing the sh*t out of the university. I can assure you she will be pointing out all of the institutional failures that led to this result, including the substantial, abnormal pay raise she received. She has been Lewinskied and her life is (at least temporarily) ruined. It is a sad situation for all involved and it should be left at that.

That being said, how can PSU take advantage? :)

No, no, no. You have no information that warrants labeling the mistress a victim. She almost certainly knew he was married, 100% knew he was wealthy, and almost certainly engaged in this activity of her own volition as a grown adult. Stop perpetuating sexist stereotypes and excusing a complicit party in an immoral affair due to gender based prejudices you hold. They should both be ashamed based on what we know at present.
 

KingLando

All-Conference
Nov 29, 2021
5,438
3,184
113
No, no, no. You have no information that warrants labeling the mistress a victim. She almost certainly knew he was married, 100% knew he was wealthy, and almost certainly engaged in this activity of her own volition as a grown adult. Stop perpetuating sexist stereotypes and excusing a complicit party in an immoral affair due to gender based prejudices you hold. They should both be ashamed based on what we know at present.
You blaming the woman for a married man cheating is a gender based prejudice. She had no obligation to anyone here.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: mh-larch

PSUHarry

All-Conference
Jul 15, 2003
1,954
2,297
113
There is the personal part but there is also the career part. This is what he spent his life working toward and he reached the top of his profession, so to speak. Now his coaching career is most likely (at least should be) over. Once all the dust settles, what is his first job interview going to be like? What is he going to do the rest of his life?
He’s gonna be a UPS driver at best. Nothing wrong with that but compared to a D1 football coach at one of the winningest programs ever it’s not a great look.
 

mh-larch

Senior
Nov 20, 2019
232
473
63

I see one of our schills has said the quiet part out loud. Very much out loud.
Thanks! Great article and spot on. The Michigan Athletic Department is rotten to the core, and not just with this latest incident.....this goes way back!

BTW, this article doesn't even mention all the miscreants affiliated with the department who have misbehaved.
Link: Alex Yood tried to meet up with a 13 yo
 
Last edited:

PSUHarry

All-Conference
Jul 15, 2003
1,954
2,297
113
That’s basically the status of things now but it’s a bad progression of the law. A 31 year old woman knows what she doing. Can always say no and if targeted, that’s what the law was meant to address. Not someone that goes along with it then regrets it. She should not be rewarded.
Though she knows what she’s doing he may have made her employment contingent upon her being in a relationship with him. These situations are not just about an affair. They are a power play by male managers over a direct subordinate. It’s often control. The employment piece is huge here. It’s a power dynamic. It’s the reason organizations have rules about relationships with subordinates. It’s a liability for them as it can result in sexual harassment.
 

mh-larch

Senior
Nov 20, 2019
232
473
63
Though she knows what she’s doing he may have made her employment contingent upon her being in a relationship with him. These situations are not just about an affair. They are a power play by male managers over a direct subordinate. It’s often control. The employment piece is huge here. It’s a power dynamic. It’s the reason organizations have rules about relationships with subordinates. It’s a liability for them as it can result in sexual harassment.
While I agree....she could have said NO. Sometimes in life you have to stand by what's right and your core values even if that means losing your job. She didn't seem to mind the gigantic and unwarranted raise she received.
 

PSUHarry

All-Conference
Jul 15, 2003
1,954
2,297
113
No, no, no. You have no information that warrants labeling the mistress a victim. She almost certainly knew he was married, 100% knew he was wealthy, and almost certainly engaged in this activity of her own volition as a grown adult. Stop perpetuating sexist stereotypes and excusing a complicit party in an immoral affair due to gender based prejudices you hold. They should both be ashamed based on what we know at present.
We don’t know how much of a victim she is yet. His controlling nature going to her house is not a good indicator her. The manager subordinate relationship here is a huge HR problem for UM. If he made her salary and employment dependent on her staying a relationship with him that is sexual harrassment and really bad. It’s a significant power play by a manager over a subordinate. Organizations get sued for a lot of money for this. When a female sues she also knows even if she wins her career is damaged forever. She’s barely employable after this. Thats the terrible double standard that exists. This is serious stuff for Michigan.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mh-larch

PSUHarry

All-Conference
Jul 15, 2003
1,954
2,297
113
While I agree....she could have said NO. Sometimes in life you have to stand by what's right and your core values even if that means losing your job. She didn't seem to mind the gigantic and unwarranted raise she received.
Pretty easy to say that from the outside. He could have threatened her job if she didn’t comply to the relationship. Having a relationship with a subordinate inherently creates an employment power play.

it’s his responsibility to report the relationship. Once an organization knows they can take steps to transfer her to another department and then they can continue the relationship. He didn’t do this because he was cheating on his wife.

This isn’t about her saying yes to the relationship and being an equal responsible partner. These types of relationships are power centric for the superior. There’s a reason there are rules about this.

People seem to be missing the point here.
 

KingLando

All-Conference
Nov 29, 2021
5,438
3,184
113
Pretty easy to say that from the outside. He could have threatened her job if she didn’t comply to the relationship. Having a relationship with a subordinate inherently creates an employment power play.

it’s his responsibility to report the relationship. Once an organization knows they can take steps to transfer her to another department and then they can continue the relationship. He didn’t do this because he was cheating on his wife.

This isn’t about her saying yes to the relationship and being an equal responsible partner. These types of relationships are power centric for the superior. There’s a reason there are rules about this.

People seem to be missing the point here.
I agree with you here but to be fair the poster you replied to wasn't necessarily disagreeing with you. Just stated they believe someone should put their moral beliefs over everything else. Which is fair as its only their opinion on how they believe they'd have handled it. Truthfully no one knows what they'd do until in that situation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mh-larch

PSUHarry

All-Conference
Jul 15, 2003
1,954
2,297
113
I agree with you here but to be fair the poster you replied to wasn't necessarily disagreeing with you. Just stated they believe someone should put their moral beliefs over everything else. Which is fair as it’s only their opinion on how they believe they'd have handled it. Truthfully no one knows what they'd do until in that situation.
This is as much about moral decisions as it is about HR Employment rules. People make bad moral decisions all the time but when you do it in the workplace there are big ramifications different from just cheating on your wife in general.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Binder74

OUIrPSU

All-Conference
Oct 6, 2021
1,309
1,662
113
While I agree....she could have said NO. Sometimes in life you have to stand by what's right and your core values even if that means losing your job. She didn't seem to mind the gigantic and unwarranted raise she received.
How do you know that? You have no idea what she could and could not do. I am not defending her, but maybe stop making accusations until you know what really happened (which I assume is never).
 

KingLando

All-Conference
Nov 29, 2021
5,438
3,184
113
This is as much about moral decisions as it is about HR Employment rules. People make bad moral decisions all the time but when you do it in the workplace there are big ramifications different from just cheating on your wife in general.
Trust me, I get the legal side of it and agree with you
The other poster was simply saying they believe she should have turned down the advances even if that would have cost her the job. He wasn't saying she couldn't take them to court over it.
 

LMTLION

All-Conference
Mar 20, 2008
1,297
2,784
112
With SCUM in turmoil, suddenly our schedule looks even easier for next year. They’re not getting a Freeman or Deboer and they have a lot of cleanup to do inside their program and athletic department overall. They also ruined trust by likely sitting on the whole thing until after signing day. They’re going to be in a much larger rebuild than we are in my opinion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SkiSkiSki

SleepyLion

All-Conference
Sep 1, 2022
2,491
3,730
113
Thanks! Great article and spot on. The Michigan Athletic Department is rotten to the core, and not just with this latest incident.....this goes way back!

BTW, this article doesn't even mention all the miscreants affiliated with the department who have misbehaved.
Link: Alex Yood tried to meet up with a 13 yo
don't forget this one too...
 

PSUFTG

All-Conference
Nov 1, 2021
2,216
3,431
113
With SCUM in turmoil, suddenly our schedule looks even easier for next year. They’re not getting a Freeman or Deboer and they have a lot of cleanup to do inside their program and athletic department overall. They also ruined trust by likely sitting on the whole thing until after signing day. They’re going to be in a much larger rebuild than we are in my opinion.
With such a ridiculously large "conference", with so much flotsam and mediocrity within it, somebody (or several somebodies) are going to get pussycat schedules each year.

Last year (2025) it was Maryland (and Locksley still managed to lose EIGHT IN A ROW! How does that guy still have a job?), Nebraska, Michigan, and OSU (though at least OSU and Michigan scheduled a quality OOC game) Indiana's was also rather light - but, as with OSU, difficulty dropped significantly due to PSU ending up being so much less than what was expected.

Next year's PSU schedule has the potential to make all of those schedules look difficult in comparison - IF Michigan ends up being a train wreck.
I am sure there will be a few other soft schedules among Big Ten teams as well, but PSU's will likely take the (cup)cake.

All three Big Ten playoff teams? Indiana, OSU, Oregon... not on schedule.
Three OOC payday games.
In conference? USC, Washington, Michigan, and 6 bottom feeders.... which could become 7 bottom feeders if Michigan implodes. A "normal" PSU team would be an odds on favorite to win at least 11 (and any loss would be a significant upset - if 2026 was/is a standard PSU level team)
Whether this will be anywhere near a normal PSU level squad? Who knows - but one has to see there is still some reasonable level of talent on the roster (as of this moment anyway) and hopefully more to add via the portal.

Gonna' be an interesting season, I think.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bison13 and LMTLION

Nits1989

All-Conference
Oct 29, 2021
1,228
1,791
113
Pretty easy to say that from the outside. He could have threatened her job if she didn’t comply to the relationship. Having a relationship with a subordinate inherently creates an employment power play.

it’s his responsibility to report the relationship. Once an organization knows they can take steps to transfer her to another department and then they can continue the relationship. He didn’t do this because he was cheating on his wife.

This isn’t about her saying yes to the relationship and being an equal responsible partner. These types of relationships are power centric for the superior. There’s a reason there are rules about this.

People seem to be missing the point here.
Looks more like the job was hush money to keep her quiet. Her salary doubled within the last year. Hmmm….
 

Connorpozlee

All-American
Aug 29, 2013
3,213
6,301
113
You blaming the woman for a married man cheating is a gender based prejudice. She had no obligation to anyone here.
Anybody that knowingly sleeps with a married person is a scumbag. Unless that marriage happens to be an open relationship, I suppose. It’s his marriage and he chose to ruin it of course. But she also made a choice that would ruin a family.
 

KingLando

All-Conference
Nov 29, 2021
5,438
3,184
113
Anybody that knowingly sleeps with a married person is a scumbag. Unless that marriage happens to be an open relationship, I suppose. It’s his marriage and he chose to ruin it of course. But she also made a choice that would ruin a family.
He could have told her he had an open marriage--he could have told her anything but she has no obligation to have any respect for their marriage
He made the choice to ruin his family--not her. Again, she owed them nothing.
 

KingLando

All-Conference
Nov 29, 2021
5,438
3,184
113
Let me be blunt, would you marry her? I sure wouldn’t. Tons of moral issues and red flags.
I couldn't care less about what she did--she was single.
It's weird that people want to blame the single woman for any role in this--he's the one that was married. She's free to do anything she wants.
I have no negative opinion of her at all other than she might be an idiot if she believed he'd leave his wife.
 

PSU4U

All-American
Aug 6, 2019
7,063
7,434
113
I think Michigan could potentially be in a lot of trouble over this and hope they get what they deserve. Absolute trash, cheating and unethical program under Manuel’s leadership.
Culture that they have been displaying for all to see at least ever since the Sleep Over. Now BO and his butt buddies were on a different level at least Moore likes woman.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SkiSkiSki

FK3JM

Junior
Oct 31, 2021
147
320
63
We don’t know how much of a victim she is yet. His controlling nature going to her house is not a good indicator her. The manager subordinate relationship here is a huge HR problem for UM. If he made her salary and employment dependent on her staying a relationship with him that is sexual harrassment and really bad. It’s a significant power play by a manager over a subordinate. Organizations get sued for a lot of money for this. When a female sues she also knows even if she wins her career is damaged forever. She’s barely employable after this. Thats the terrible double standard that exists. This is serious stuff for Michigan.
Your entire argument hinges on “if”. If she came onto him to get her job or tried to screw her way to the top - she should be a pariah as much as him. Neither of us has any clue though- so let’s stop making up assumption based narratives.
 

FK3JM

Junior
Oct 31, 2021
147
320
63
Pretty easy to say that from the outside. He could have threatened her job if she didn’t comply to the relationship. Having a relationship with a subordinate inherently creates an employment power play.

it’s his responsibility to report the relationship. Once an organization knows they can take steps to transfer her to another department and then they can continue the relationship. He didn’t do this because he was cheating on his wife.

This isn’t about her saying yes to the relationship and being an equal responsible partner. These types of relationships are power centric for the superior. There’s a reason there are rules about this.

People seem to be missing the point here.
I think you’re missing the point because you are making things up like you go on weekend trips with these two and understand the relationship dynamics. If it comes out that he initiated this or was coercive - then I’ll agree with everything you said. You don’t know, so stop saying he lorded his power over her
 

PSUHarry

All-Conference
Jul 15, 2003
1,954
2,297
113
With SCUM in turmoil, suddenly our schedule looks even easier for next year. They’re not getting a Freeman or Deboer and they have a lot of cleanup to do inside their program and athletic department overall. They also ruined trust by likely sitting on the whole thing until after signing day. They’re going to be in a much larger rebuild than we are in my opinion.
They will have a rebuild but ours is worse. We basically have nonsense line at all. Strong rumor the whole group will opt out of the bowl game. That will provide a bit of an indication.

sure there is the portal but how many quality Olineman do you find there.