Behind all of those, easily. Way behind actually.where would you rank this team compared to other UK teams?
I think the contenders are:
1993
1997
1998
1999
2002
2006
2007
2008
2009
Behind all of those, easily. Way behind actually.
It was but it also had Tim Couch at QB and beat Bama.It's interesting, isn't it?
The 1997 team was so porous defensively, that I think I might drop it below this squad.
That Bama team finished a stellar 4-7It was but it also had Tim Couch at QB and beat Bama.
Yep, that one. Also, UK had a 1st year coach. Who managed to beat Bama and U of L. 1ST YEAR COACH.That Bama team finished a stellar 4-7
Yep, that one. Also, UK had a 1st year coach. Who managed to beat Bama and U of L. 1ST YEAR COACH.
And uofl was an even better 1-10. We bash stoops for his wins against bad teams ( who all our sec wins beside mizzu has beat someone they shouldn't have and aren't nearly as bad as they are made out to be on this board). those teams who went to bowls and a lot of brooks and joker teams had a built in win in uofl at that time. All they had to do was beat two sec teams. (Miss state wasn't nearly what they are with Mullins and vandy was pre Franklin. This team is as good as most of those. 07 was the best last 30 years.Yep, that one. Also, UK had a 1st year coach. Who managed to beat Bama and U of L. 1ST YEAR COACH.
UofL was a built in win ? Brooks was 3-3 vs UofL and Joker was 1-2 vs UofL. Looking back I guess the Kragthorpe Years could be considered a built in win.And uofl was an even better 1-10. We bash stoops for his wins against bad teams ( who all our sec wins beside mizzu has beat someone they shouldn't have and aren't nearly as bad as they are made out to be on this board). those teams who went to bowls and a lot of brooks and joker teams had a built in win in uofl at that time. All they had to do was beat two sec teams. (Miss state wasn't nearly what they are with Mullins and vandy was pre Franklin. This team is as good as most of those. 07 was the best last 30 years.
Actually no, you take out the Petrino years and the modern series would be 8-8.Take out the the petrino years and we pretty much dominated that series. And the years we went bowling with. Brooks was exactly the kragtharp years. Jokers first year bowling was strings first year.
Like I said this was Mumme's 1st year. Stoops is year 4. Huge difference. '97 team would light up this defense.And uofl was an even better 1-10. We bash stoops for his wins against bad teams ( who all our sec wins beside mizzu has beat someone they shouldn't have and aren't nearly as bad as they are made out to be on this board). those teams who went to bowls and a lot of brooks and joker teams had a built in win in uofl at that time. All they had to do was beat two sec teams. (Miss state wasn't nearly what they are with Mullins and vandy was pre Franklin. This team is as good as most of those. 07 was the best last 30 years.
That mumme team didn't even qualify for a bowl. It beat Louisville (1-10), Indiana (2-9) some division 1a team NE Louisiana (5-7) Alabama (4-7 and (2-6 in sec with wins over vandy and ole miss) and vandy (3/8 and 0-8 in sec). That team was really not that good. There losses were not even competive. An 8 pt loss to state, Ten to Georgia, then 27, 28 and 35 of losses. To brag about that team, but ***** about this team only beating bad teams is quite laughable. This team wins this game like the mizzu game.Like I said this was Mumme's 1st year. Stoops is year 4. Huge difference. '97 team would light up this defense.
Great post !!That mumme team didn't even qualify for a bowl. It beat Louisville (1-10), Indiana (2-9) some division 1a team NE Louisiana (5-7) Alabama (4-7 and (2-6 in sec with wins over vandy and ole miss) and vandy (3/8 and 0-8 in sec). That team was really not that good. There losses were not even competive. An 8 pt loss to state, Ten to Georgia, then 27, 28 and 35 of losses. To brag about that team, but ***** about this team only beating bad teams is quite laughable. This team wins this game like the mizzu game.
Actually this years mizzu team is very comparable to 97. Puts up big numbers against terrible teams, but can't compete with anyone else.
You're missing the point. That was year 1 for Mumme. YEAR 1. You're talking about a coach that took over for Curry. Good grief. They were atrocious. They lost to UT who had some guy named Manning as their QB, BTW.That mumme team didn't even qualify for a bowl. It beat Louisville (1-10), Indiana (2-9) some division 1a team NE Louisiana (5-7) Alabama (4-7 and (2-6 in sec with wins over vandy and ole miss) and vandy (3/8 and 0-8 in sec). That team was really not that good. There losses were not even competive. An 8 pt loss to state, Ten to Georgia, then 27, 28 and 35 of losses. To brag about that team, but ***** about this team only beating bad teams is quite laughable. This team wins this game like the mizzu game.
Actually this years mizzu team is very comparable to 97. Puts up big numbers against terrible teams, but can't compete with anyone else.
1993 was easily the weakest squad !It was but it also had Tim Couch at QB and beat Bama.
That's a fair statement.1993 was easily the weakest squad !
Yep.UofL was a built in win ? Brooks was 3-3 vs UofL and Joker was 1-2 vs UofL. Looking back I guess the Kragthorpe Years could be considered a built in win.