On it's face that is good. But passing attempts matter.
Other B1G stats:
Thorson, NW-- 35 sack/489 attempts- 1 sack/14 attempts
Blough, Purdue 28 sacks/462 attempts=1 sack per 16.5 attempts.
McSorley, PSU 27 sacks/361 att=1 sack/13.4 attempts
Ramsey, IND- 27 sack/447 att=1 sack/16.5 attempts
Martinez, NEB- 23 sack/347 att=1 sack/15.1 attempts
Patterson, MI- 22 sack/325 att=1 sack/14.8 attempts
Lewerke, MSt= 19 sack/339 att= 1 sack/17.8 attempts
Annexstad, MINN- 16/187= 1 sack/11.8 attempts
Bush, ILL, 15/217- 1 sack/14.5 attempts
Hornibrook, WI- 14/205-- 1 sack/14.6 attempts
Sitkowski--12/273--1 sack/22.75 attempts.
On this stat alone, it seems that the Rutgers OL did a stellar job of protecting Artur, as he was sacked at a much lower rate per attempt than the other B1G QBs listed. However, perhaps other stats such as completion % and INTs, which we know are low for Artur. But it is better to throw the ball away for an incompletion than take a sack. INTs are another story
You (not you per se) cannot spin away 16 sacks. That's a really really low number. No amount of "throwing away" or whatever reason given can explain 16 sacks given up by a supposedly "bad OL".
Trying to come up with a reason or a reasonable explanation for the ineptitude of the offense last year reminds me of Occam's Razor. In the end, it's really very simple - we had terrible QB play. That's it. We had horrible QB play last year. It was like Gary Nova against Kent State - only it's for the entire year. It was bad at an epic level. Our QB play last year was as bad as our OL was in 2010 when we gave up 61 sacks. Epic bad.
Hopefully it doesn't take our coaches more than 1 season to figure out what IMG coaches figured out in only a few games. Otherwise it will be a loooong season again and BlockR will get his wish.