Gift turnovers, come on. You act like the Tooth Fairy gave them, them. The turnovers this year were by design not gifted. They're now attacking the ball which does lead to broken tackles. It's a risk/reward they were willing to take. Last year 10 turnovers in 12 games, this year 18 turnovers in 9 games. Had nothing to do with luck.
Sitkowski
- Thread starter redlinehw
- Start date
Yeah so the weather doesn’t impact other teams QB? Ok got it.
How many interceptions did Art have in 2020? Zero. How many did he have in 2019? Two. Numerous interceptions?? Oh, I see it now. You are referring to his 2018 stats as a green, true freshman when he was behind a line that couldnt block many FBS defensive lines. Yes, numerous in 2018 but very unfair to apply that to present day when trying to support your position.
Sit has the talent, but so far it only has shown on an inconstant bases.
Artur is a talented player that was rushed into the limelight before he was ready and that might have stunted his development, even if he red-shirted most of last year.
We seem to be forgetting that when Sit went to IMG for his senior HS year he lost the starting position.
The holes in Sit's game might not have be fixable now that he could be considered P-5 starting material.
The talent Artur is said to posses, is one that would make him good P-5 QB if developed right.
This year he only shown flashes of that and did not prove he could be counted on to play at the level his talent suggests he can play.
I believe Sit has two more yeas of eligibility, but not sure if he'll use it at RU .
But if he does, hope Gleason can get Sit's talent to show , in 2021, like we hoped he would be when he first arrive4d on the Banks in 2018.
Artur is a talented player that was rushed into the limelight before he was ready and that might have stunted his development, even if he red-shirted most of last year.
We seem to be forgetting that when Sit went to IMG for his senior HS year he lost the starting position.
The holes in Sit's game might not have be fixable now that he could be considered P-5 starting material.
The talent Artur is said to posses, is one that would make him good P-5 QB if developed right.
This year he only shown flashes of that and did not prove he could be counted on to play at the level his talent suggests he can play.
I believe Sit has two more yeas of eligibility, but not sure if he'll use it at RU .
But if he does, hope Gleason can get Sit's talent to show , in 2021, like we hoped he would be when he first arrive4d on the Banks in 2018.
Truth. The offense will go as the O line goes.
And the QBs are all playing their asses off, and have had good and bad moments. Not gonna beat up on any of them.
Some of these posts remind me of certain "news" outlets that still will not recognize or report certain stories or ask the P-elect certain questions. Sweep issued under the carpet that are plainly there.
Agree with your post and @rutgersal's. Sitkowski had a better season than Vedral, but when the line is getting dominated and there's no running attack, there's not much a QB can do. Without Art's clutch play we'd likely have finished 1-7 instead of 3-5, which would have been a totally different narrative going into the off-season. Winning 3 Big Ten games this year will do wonders for recruiting.
Maybe Rutgers should do the same thing with AS that they did with 2 big QBs who didn't have the talent to be an FBS QB: move him to TE.