Slippery Slope

WhiteTailEER

New member
Jun 17, 2005
11,534
170
0
That's sounds like a stupid law.

That could be the understatement of the year.

So, the article says that it could give "conservative Christians" blah blah blah .... but it doesn't specify Christianity (or maybe it does, I didn't read the link to the actual Bill), so change the headline to read "radical Muslims" and imagine the outcry.

People could start religions just to skirt certain laws.

This is unbelievably stupid. It essentially neuters the entire justice system.
 

mneilmont

New member
Jan 23, 2008
20,883
166
0
You are a liar. The proposal itself is bad, but to add a little color, you have to lie and restrict it to conservatives. The only way your statement becomes factual would be to exclude all liberals as atheists. I have seen too many WV Democrats who claim to be religious people.

Go to Southern part of the state and tell those folks that no one who believes in God can be a Democrat.

The Bill 11 does not specify any political affiliation. It pertains to all people who believe in God. Prohibited by the 1st Amendment? Of course.

Probably need to kill the bill and discussion or the president will make an Exec Order that forbids anyone from having religious convictions. Just think, it would take the SCOTUS a year to hear the case and all worshiping would cease until that date. It actually does become a bit scary when we think of what Obama precedence is setting.
 

mneilmont

New member
Jan 23, 2008
20,883
166
0
I'm just amazed he made no cock sucking references in this one. He really does have a fascination in that department.
Triple Prick did brag about sucking cock. I am just trying to aid in his advertising.

Why do you come to his aid in every entry? For me, If he likes it, I am just trying to assist in his solicitation.
 

mneilmont

New member
Jan 23, 2008
20,883
166
0
What exactly did he lie about? He linked an article to read.
I looked at the root bill and found no reference to conservative. You can detect deception when you compare the two. I attempt to verify the root for posters who tend to be dishonest.
 

RichardPeterJohnson

New member
Dec 7, 2010
12,636
108
0
Triple Prick did brag about sucking cock. I am just trying to aid in his advertising.

Why do you come to his aid in every entry? For me, If he likes it, I am just trying to assist in his solicitation.
Old racist man, I'm not sure where you think you heard me bragging about fellatio but it is readily apparent that you aren't right in the head. You sure do think a lot about penises though. More than a gay man, I'd imagine.
 

bamaEER

New member
May 29, 2001
32,435
60
0
Triple Prick did brag about sucking cock. I am just trying to aid in his advertising.

Why do you come to his aid in every entry? For me, If he likes it, I am just trying to assist in his solicitation.
I was responding to WhitetailEER, but yeah whatever you say.
 

WhiteTailEER

New member
Jun 17, 2005
11,534
170
0
I looked at the root bill and found no reference to conservative. You can detect deception when you compare the two. I attempt to verify the root for posters who tend to be dishonest.

You start on a rant against countryroads that begins with calling him a liar, and then continue on this rant as if he personally made every statement in the article. Then, your rant includes a bunch of **** that has absolutely nothing to do with the article in the first place.

Then you reply to bamaEER's comment made to me and it's all about RPJ. It would make sense, maybe, if he had responded to RPJ, but he responded to me. RPJ had nothing to do with it.

There may have been a time when you were a smart man (I'm sure Business English was a really challenging course), but it's clear that you are losing it.

And then of course there's the issue of you barely being able to post anything without referencing cock sucking ... that's OK, nobody is judging
 
Last edited:

mneilmont

New member
Jan 23, 2008
20,883
166
0
You start on a rant against countryroads that begins with calling him a liar, and then continue on this rant as if he personally made every statement in the article. Then, your rant includes a bunch of **** that has absolutely nothing to do with the article in the first place.

Then you reply to bamaEER's comment made to me and it's all about RPJ. It would make sense, maybe, if he had responded to RPJ, but he responded to me. RPJ had nothing to do with it.

There may have been a time when you were a smart man (I'm sure Business English was a really challenging course), but it's clear that you are losing it.

And then of course there's the issue of you barely being able to post anything without referencing cock sucking ... that's OK, nobody is judging
So, what is your *****? Is the whole world closing in on you? You want me to stick to the subject of the article. And I did. The subject was Senate Bill 11, and it did not reference Conservative. If I am required to give credit to all, the OP was repeating a lie that was offered in the article. Is this one of the rules you offer for the board since it was overlooked by V.? The "other ****" refers to the Bill that was lied about. How is that properly addressed in your rules for the board? I normally ignore lies offered by the cock sucking Triple Prick - that is not your problem. Your problem appears to be reading and comprehension. Go back and read post #5 and 7 and tell me I am not the subject.

And, I am only smart enough to tell you what I am talking about. I have never offered myself as a know all who gets involved in conversations that I don't know the origination. That is simple stupidity and if you don't like that, you can go *** yourself. Actually your are attempting to judge, and it ain't gonna work. We will handle it any way you choose - as long as you are entertaining.
 

RichardPeterJohnson

New member
Dec 7, 2010
12,636
108
0
So, what is your *****? Is the whole world closing in on you? You want me to stick to the subject of the article. And I did. The subject was Senate Bill 11, and it did not reference Conservative. If I am required to give credit to all, the OP was repeating a lie that was offered in the article. Is this one of the rules you offer for the board since it was overlooked by V.? The "other ****" refers to the Bill that was lied about. How is that properly addressed in your rules for the board? I normally ignore lies offered by the cock sucking Triple Prick - that is not your problem. Your problem appears to be reading and comprehension. Go back and read post #5 and 7 and tell me I am not the subject.

And, I am only smart enough to tell you what I am talking about. I have never offered myself as a know all who gets involved in conversations that I don't know the origination. That is simple stupidity and if you don't like that, you can go *** yourself. Actually your are attempting to judge, and it ain't gonna work. We will handle it any way you choose - as long as you are entertaining.
I bet your grandchildren would be proud of your performance in this forum. You remind me of this because you are obviously all three....
 

WhiteTailEER

New member
Jun 17, 2005
11,534
170
0
The subject was Senate Bill 11, and it did not reference Conservative

We will handle it any way you choose - as long as you are entertaining.

"West Virginia GOP Push Bill .... " - from the linked article
"A sweeping religious freedom bIll promoted by Republicans in West Virginia ..." - from the article linked from the original article

The actual Bill: http://www.legis.state.wv.us/Bill_S...illdoc=SB11 intr.htm&yr=2016&sesstype=RS&i=11 Introduced By Senators Karnes, Gaunch, Leonhardt, Trump, Takubo, Boso and Blair

Craig Blair Republican 15 Room 217W, Bldg. 1
1900 Kanawha Blvd. E.
Charleston, WV 25305 [email protected] (304) 357-7867
Greg Boso Republican 11 Room 214W, Bldg. 1
1900 Kanawha Blvd. E.
Charleston, WV 25305 [email protected] (304) 357-7973
Ed Gaunch Republican 08 Room 216W, Bldg. 1
1900 Kanawha Blvd. E.
Charleston, WV 25305 [email protected] (304) 357-7841
Robert L. Karnes Republican 11 Room 200W, Bldg. 1
1900 Kanawha Blvd. E.
Charleston, WV 25305 [email protected] (304) 357-7906
Kent Leonhardt Republican 02 Room 200W, Bldg. 1
1900 Kanawha Blvd. E.
Charleston, WV 25305 [email protected] (304) 357-7827
Tom Takubo Republican 17 Room 417M, Bldg. 1
1900 Kanawha Blvd. E.
Charleston, WV 25305 [email protected] (304) 357-7990
Charles S. Trump IV Republican 15 Room 210W, Bldg. 1
1900 Kanawha Blvd. E.
Charleston, WV 25305 [email protected] (304) 357-7980


You're absolutely right ... no reference to conservatives at all anywhere to be found in the articles or the bill. :eek:kay:

As for your last comment ... I have no idea what you would be suggesting. How about you just stop being such a dick all the time?

Again ... no need to call CountryRoads a liar, all he did was post a link to an article.
 

RichardPeterJohnson

New member
Dec 7, 2010
12,636
108
0
"West Virginia GOP Push Bill .... " - from the linked article
"A sweeping religious freedom bIll promoted by Republicans in West Virginia ..." - from the article linked from the original article

The actual Bill: http://www.legis.state.wv.us/Bill_Status/bills_text.cfm?billdoc=SB11 intr.htm&yr=2016&sesstype=RS&i=11 Introduced By Senators Karnes, Gaunch, Leonhardt, Trump, Takubo, Boso and Blair

Craig Blair Republican 15 Room 217W, Bldg. 1
1900 Kanawha Blvd. E.
Charleston, WV 25305 [email protected] (304) 357-7867
Greg Boso Republican 11 Room 214W, Bldg. 1
1900 Kanawha Blvd. E.
Charleston, WV 25305 [email protected] (304) 357-7973
Ed Gaunch Republican 08 Room 216W, Bldg. 1
1900 Kanawha Blvd. E.
Charleston, WV 25305 [email protected] (304) 357-7841
Robert L. Karnes Republican 11 Room 200W, Bldg. 1
1900 Kanawha Blvd. E.
Charleston, WV 25305 [email protected] (304) 357-7906
Kent Leonhardt Republican 02 Room 200W, Bldg. 1
1900 Kanawha Blvd. E.
Charleston, WV 25305 [email protected] (304) 357-7827
Tom Takubo Republican 17 Room 417M, Bldg. 1
1900 Kanawha Blvd. E.
Charleston, WV 25305 [email protected] (304) 357-7990
Charles S. Trump IV Republican 15 Room 210W, Bldg. 1
1900 Kanawha Blvd. E.
Charleston, WV 25305 [email protected] (304) 357-7980


You're absolutely right ... no reference to conservatives at all anywhere to be found in the articles or the bill. :eek:kay:

As for your last comment ... I have no idea what you would be suggesting. How about you just stop being such a dick all the time?

Again ... no need to call CountryRoads a liar, all he did was post a link to an article.
Ouch! That left a mark on the old racist.
 

mneilmont

New member
Jan 23, 2008
20,883
166
0
Old racist man, I'm not sure where you think you heard me bragging about fellatio but it is readily apparent that you aren't right in the head. You sure do think a lot about penises though. More than a gay man, I'd imagine.
Damn, I just about skipped over this softball. Did you not tell me you were a better cock sucker than Knox? If you deny it, you are the most lying son of a beach on the board. You stay so removed from reality when you over use your mind altering meds. Maybe you were just so fuked up that day that there is a great possibility that you don't remember.

Don't you think it is odd that so many people on the board tell you of your lies? You normally act like you didn't hear, or you don't post for a few weeks while the board settles down. You are either a liar or the biggest addict on the board. I would suspect both. You say **** and within a couple days, you change position and argue the other way. It is so easy for you that perhaps your mind is altered. You say you are in the profession, may I suggest you consult with a cohort? Even if you are mentally sick, I will not back down until you seek help, I would like for others who feel the same way to nicely suggest you need help. This is a place we play and waste time. You have come on so strongly on others that they bow out because they can stand no more abuse from you - and of course your followers have no problem reinforcing your lies while knowing not the damage done to poor fellow for having a desire to follow WV athletics.
 

RichardPeterJohnson

New member
Dec 7, 2010
12,636
108
0
Damn, I just about skipped over this softball. Did you not tell me you were a better cock sucker than Knox? If you deny it, you are the most lying son of a beach on the board. You stay so removed from reality when you over use your mind altering meds. Maybe you were just so fuked up that day that there is a great possibility that you don't remember.

Don't you think it is odd that so many people on the board tell you of your lies? You normally act like you didn't hear, or you don't post for a few weeks while the board settles down. You are either a liar or the biggest addict on the board. I would suspect both. You say **** and within a couple days, you change position and argue the other way. It is so easy for you that perhaps your mind is altered. You say you are in the profession, may I suggest you consult with a cohort? Even if you are mentally sick, I will not back down until you seek help, I would like for others who feel the same way to nicely suggest you need help. This is a place we play and waste time. You have come on so strongly on others that they bow out because they can stand no more abuse from you - and of course your followers have no problem reinforcing your lies while knowing not the damage done to poor fellow for having a desire to follow WV athletics.

You obviously are senile. I've never said I was a better c*c*sucker" than anyone. (not that there's anything wrong with that). I'm a hetero male. Remember when you called my son a ***? I'll give you the benefit of the doubt that you don't because you are an idiot. And senile. I bet your 3 grandchildren are very proud of their crazy papa. get back to your bowl of jello. what flavor today?
 

mneilmont

New member
Jan 23, 2008
20,883
166
0
You're absolutely right ... no reference to conservatives at all anywhere to be found in the articles or the bill.
Then, I respectfully ask, why are you going forward with this line of reasoning?

I am sure you have knowledge of Countryboy's history in addressing conservatives(that includes me). He has been rather rough in his vernacular. Would it be more acceptable if I simply remind him that he should not repeat this misleading article? Do you think that comment would get a response? I used liar as an attention getter and then addressed my complaint. I can handle it that way or ignore/pass the absolute falsehood. I chose to address the misleading offering he made and demanded his attention to the matter. That sounds like a reasonable response to me.

If this is what you are referring to me "being a dick", I ask for your help in overcoming the problem. You were very specific in the charge, will you be equally specific in what I need to do to overcome it? Don't give many opportunities for people to do this, but you want to offer yourself with the ability to identify and course of correction. Again, have a go at it.

Then maybe we can both set our parameters for discussions on this board.
 

DvlDog4WVU

Well-known member
Feb 2, 2008
46,613
1,503
113
You obviously are senile. I've never said I was a better c*c*sucker" than anyone. (not that there's anything wrong with that). I'm a hetero male. Remember when you called my son a ***? I'll give you the benefit of the doubt that you don't because you are an idiot. And senile. I bet your 3 grandchildren are very proud of their crazy papa. get back to your bowl of jello. what flavor today?
You know, you aren't a spring chicken man. It won't be much longer before you start pissing your pants randomly.
 
Sep 6, 2013
27,594
120
0
Then, I respectfully ask, why are you going forward with this line of reasoning?

I am sure you have knowledge of Countryboy's history in addressing conservatives(that includes me). He has been rather rough in his vernacular. Would it be more acceptable if I simply remind him that he should not repeat this misleading article? Do you think that comment would get a response? I used liar as an attention getter and then addressed my complaint. I can handle it that way or ignore/pass the absolute falsehood. I chose to address the misleading offering he made and demanded his attention to the matter. That sounds like a reasonable response to me.

If this is what you are referring to me "being a dick", I ask for your help in overcoming the problem. You were very specific in the charge, will you be equally specific in what I need to do to overcome it? Don't give many opportunities for people to do this, but you want to offer yourself with the ability to identify and course of correction. Again, have a go at it.

Then maybe we can both set our parameters for discussions on this board.

I ignore you most of the time because most of the time you have nothing meaningful to offer. You can take the way I address conservatives any way you like. I don't have much respect for them. If it offends you, that is entirely up to you. This article referenced a Bill that is so ridiculous that it needed no additional commentary from me. The WV and/or US Supreme Court will have a field day with this.
 

mneilmont

New member
Jan 23, 2008
20,883
166
0
Ouch! That left a mark on the old racist.
It should leave a mark on you as a wanna be who attempts to inflame. Is your overdose causing you to see the word "conservative" within that bill? You may want to see a competent eye Dr. to check your physical problem. If that provides no relief, you may want to visit a psych.
 

RichardPeterJohnson

New member
Dec 7, 2010
12,636
108
0
You know, you aren't a spring chicken man. It won't be much longer before you start pissing your pants randomly.
True. But 50 is the new 30. I just hope when I start losing my mental faculties, I don't get on a message board and make a fool of myself with racist rants and call people's children insulting names.
 

WhiteTailEER

New member
Jun 17, 2005
11,534
170
0
Then, I respectfully ask, why are you going forward with this line of reasoning?

I am sure you have knowledge of Countryboy's history in addressing conservatives(that includes me). He has been rather rough in his vernacular. Would it be more acceptable if I simply remind him that he should not repeat this misleading article? Do you think that comment would get a response? I used liar as an attention getter and then addressed my complaint. I can handle it that way or ignore/pass the absolute falsehood. I chose to address the misleading offering he made and demanded his attention to the matter. That sounds like a reasonable response to me.

If this is what you are referring to me "being a dick", I ask for your help in overcoming the problem. You were very specific in the charge, will you be equally specific in what I need to do to overcome it? Don't give many opportunities for people to do this, but you want to offer yourself with the ability to identify and course of correction. Again, have a go at it.

Then maybe we can both set our parameters for discussions on this board.

Clearly you don't understand sarcasm ... or much of anything else.

If you actually read the bill ... there isn't anything in either article that's a lie. So, even if you are condemning the article and not CountryRoads, there was still no need to call anybody a liar. The article(s) said it was being pushed by the GOP, and I showed that EVERY person introducing the bill is a Republican. For you to call him a liar because conservatives weren't referenced anywhere is ridiculous.

Perhaps you'd like to point out exactly what is an "absolute falsehood?"

CountryRoads does address the conservatives on this board harshly at times ... but you certainly can't feign innocence in this regard and neither can the majority of the conservatives he addresses that way. It's the way the board is ... for you to attempt to single him out for it is HUGELY disingenuous.

The guy posted a link to an article ... that's done probably a dozen times a day and everybody else on the board usually comments on the article and things go from there. Again, he said NOTHING, and you immediately proclaim him a liar ... if it has to be pointed out to you that you're being a dick by doing that, then there's nothing me or anybody else can do to help you.
 

RichardPeterJohnson

New member
Dec 7, 2010
12,636
108
0
It should leave a mark on you as a wanna be who attempts to inflame. Is your overdose causing you to see the word "conservative" within that bill? You may want to see a competent eye Dr. to check your physical problem. If that provides no relief, you may want to visit a psych.
You don't even know who you're responding to now. Crazy, senile racist. Confused much?[roll]
 

mneilmont

New member
Jan 23, 2008
20,883
166
0
You obviously are senile. I've never said I was a better c*c*sucker" than anyone. (not that there's anything wrong with that). I'm a hetero male. Remember when you called my son a ***? I'll give you the benefit of the doubt that you don't because you are an idiot. And senile. I bet your 3 grandchildren are very proud of their crazy papa. get back to your bowl of jello. what flavor today?
Next, you will try to deny making fun of Sarah Palin's mentally handicapped son and and the suggestion/statement that it was actually the granddaughter. I had just had a niece die of the affliction, and you found great levity that it happened in Palin family.

That discussion was carried on for a week and it finally led to your acknowledgement that you had Black Cousins when you were chastising me for using the word black in a sentence that was in no way intended to be racist. But you had to put me down and told me you had cousins who were black and also to show support for the gay community. You openly said you did suck cock. You were rather boastful about it to show that you had no prejudices. I could give a ****, but you would not let it die. Thereafter, I called you a cock sucker and you have boasted about it until your post to which I am now responding.

You didn't even deny it when Knox picked up on it and he propose a dinner date. You did not say no, and you then reported that he showed up in your office. It was losing its funny part, but you still did not deny what you had so proudly proclaimed a couple years previously.

The *** thing, someone else told you where that started, and I was not even posting on OT at the time. But, in your drunkenness, you still insisted it was me. I state again that Fagg ot was/is not a part of my vocabulary. But, you insisted still and if you are going to insist it was me, I complied with calling him *** when you were going to kick the dog **** out of me. For some reason you changed your mind about that.

And that is the story of the cock sucker and ***, so help me God.
 

mneilmont

New member
Jan 23, 2008
20,883
166
0
So the GOP is not the conservatives anymore? Did this change this morning?

I never get these memos.
I thought I was making some progress with you, but you are still a stupid son of a ***** when you want to carry this forward even when you state that Conservative is not a part of the law. Again, stick your nose up Triple Prick *** and *** you you worthless POS of government ****.
 

mneilmont

New member
Jan 23, 2008
20,883
166
0
I ignore you most of the time because most of the time you have nothing meaningful to offer. You can take the way I address conservatives any way you like. I don't have much respect for them. If it offends you, that is entirely up to you. This article referenced a Bill that is so ridiculous that it needed no additional commentary from me. The WV and/or US Supreme Court will have a field day with this.
And *** you too. I will still tell you are a liar each time I see your lies. I guess we can all hide behind screen names and show our asses. I will be glad to join in.
 

RichardPeterJohnson

New member
Dec 7, 2010
12,636
108
0
Next, you will try to deny making fun of Sarah Palin's mentally handicapped son and and the suggestion/statement that it was actually the granddaughter. I had just had a niece die of the affliction, and you found great levity that it happened in Palin family.

That discussion was carried on for a week and it finally led to your acknowledgement that you had Black Cousins when you were chastising me for using the word black in a sentence that was in no way intended to be racist. But you had to put me down and told me you had cousins who were black and also to show support for the gay community. You openly said you did suck cock. You were rather boastful about it to show that you had no prejudices. I could give a ****, but you would not let it die. Thereafter, I called you a cock sucker and you have boasted about it until your post to which I am now responding.

You didn't even deny it when Knox picked up on it and he propose a dinner date. You did not say no, and you then reported that he showed up in your office. It was losing its funny part, but you still did not deny what you had so proudly proclaimed a couple years previously.

The *** thing, someone else told you where that started, and I was not even posting on OT at the time. But, in your drunkenness, you still insisted it was me. I state again that Fagg ot was/is not a part of my vocabulary. But, you insisted still and if you are going to insist it was me, I complied with calling him *** when you were going to kick the dog **** out of me. For some reason you changed your mind about that.

And that is the story of the cock sucker and ***, so help me God.
You truly are a demented old man. You have a twisted sense of reality. You memory is poor. You have anger issues. And you're a racist. For the record, I never made fun of any mentally ill child. Period. Even my conservative cohorts on this forum will not come to your aid on that one. I did repeat a rumor that the kid was Sarah's and not her daughter's. But that was the extent of that. And I never said I was a homo. Not sure how you've convinced yourself that I did. But you are incorrect. So, you got all that wrong and still think your didn't slur my son. Whatever papa. You are an insignificant peon to me. But I enjoy yanking your racists chain. I have a long memory. Unlike you. Dumbass. by the way, not only are you fat and senile, you're ugly too.
 

WhiteTailEER

New member
Jun 17, 2005
11,534
170
0
I thought I was making some progress with you, but you are still a stupid son of a ***** when you want to carry this forward even when you state that Conservative is not a part of the law. Again, stick your nose up Triple Prick *** and *** you you worthless POS of government ****.

Weren't you a cop? Cops are representatives of what? And paid how?

The entire law is being introduced by Republican legislators, which of course would indicate that's it's being introduced by conservatives. That statement was sarcasm after I used several different sources to counter your claim that conservatives weren't involved or mentioned in the article.

(for the record, I work for a private IT company ... some work is done for the government and some isn't ... so for you to continue to call me a "worthless POS government, blah blah blah" is not accurate. Obviously you don't now, nor did you ever, care about accuracy, but I just wanted to throw that out there)

Such a potty mouth ... my goodness.
 

mneilmont

New member
Jan 23, 2008
20,883
166
0
You truly are a demented old man. You have a twisted sense of reality. You memory is poor. You have anger issues. And you're a racist. For the record, I never made fun of any mentally ill child. Period. Even my conservative cohorts on this forum will not come to your aid on that one. I did repeat a rumor that the kid was Sarah's and not her daughter's. But that was the extent of that. And I never said I was a homo. Not sure how you've convinced yourself that I did. But you are incorrect. So, you got all that wrong and still think your didn't slur my son. Whatever papa. You are an insignificant peon to me. But I enjoy yanking your racists chain. I have a long memory. Unlike you. Dumbass. by the way, not only are you fat and senile, you're ugly too.
It does appear that you live in another world when you are under the influence of narcotics. You have the abllity to have a civil exchange. And then - and then you turn off like a lightbulb. Narcotics seem to have that effect on some, and you are one at the top.

No, I do not have a following sect who would blindly support what I say. Do not think I personally know anyone on here. I do not know if there are posters who would give credence to what I posted about you and what you proudly said about the handicapped child. Also that I never initiated the cock-sucker nor faggo t stories. You told them and proudly repeated them for duration until this thread. For some reason, you don't find the stories as funny as you did a couple years ago.

As an ex cop I will act as though I am before a judge and make an oath. My words regarding the objects being discussed, "are true, so help me God". You will not take that oath even though you claim to be atheist. If anyone knows the history, now is the time to come forward and shed light on the one committing perjury.
 

mneilmont

New member
Jan 23, 2008
20,883
166
0
Weren't you a cop? Cops are representatives of what? And paid how?

The entire law is being introduced by Republican legislators, which of course would indicate that's it's being introduced by conservatives. That statement was sarcasm after I used several different sources to counter your claim that conservatives weren't involved or mentioned in the article.

(for the record, I work for a private IT company ... some work is done for the government and some isn't ... so for you to continue to call me a "worthless POS government, blah blah blah" is not accurate. Obviously you don't now, nor did you ever, care about accuracy, but I just wanted to throw that out there)

Such a potty mouth ... my goodness.
My objection was, and continues to be, "Gives Conservative Christians........". Do as I ask, and show where the Bill itself "Gives Conservative Christians". Like Obamacare, it cannot select a particular group that is covered and excludes another group. Maybe the Bill was offered by Repubs, but it cannot restrict coverage to "Conservative Christians'.

Obamacare was totally offered by Dems, but the Bill does not restrict coverage to one political group. You conceded that "conservative Christians" was not uttered in the Bill nor in the Article when referring to the Bill. You know damned good and well that Bills cannot select one group at the exclusion of all others. Haven't you had enough fun with this one?
 
Sep 6, 2013
27,594
120
0
You have the abllity to have a civil exchange. And then - and then you turn off like a lightbulb.

About 5% of the time on here, you are tolerable. The other 95% you are either incoherent or blabbering some racist, name calling or jibberish about male body parts. And without a doubt, you are the one that is able to flip from one to the other at the drop of a hat. What causes this; does Edith burn your dinner? Did Meathead hog the bathroom?
 

mneilmont

New member
Jan 23, 2008
20,883
166
0
About 5% of the time on here, you are tolerable. The other 95% you are either incoherent or blabbering some racist, name calling or jibberish about male body parts. And without a doubt, you are the one that is able to flip from one to the other at the drop of a hat. What causes this; does Edith burn your dinner? Did Meathead hog the bathroom?
Cuntre boy, you were not around the site when this began, so what is your interest now? Are you that *** son of Triple Prick? If not, just exactly is your interest? Are you a bit envious because of your lack of exposure outside the hollow? Get some life exposure and come back when you grow up. Go play in the sand with your blow-up friends.
 

RichardPeterJohnson

New member
Dec 7, 2010
12,636
108
0
It does appear that you live in another world when you are under the influence of narcotics. You have the abllity to have a civil exchange. And then - and then you turn off like a lightbulb. Narcotics seem to have that effect on some, and you are one at the top.

No, I do not have a following sect who would blindly support what I say. Do not think I personally know anyone on hereYou are either a complete idiot or a liar. I do not know if there are posters who would give credence to what I posted about you and what you proudly said about the handicapped child. Also that I never initiated the cock-sucker nor faggo t stories. You told them and proudly repeated them for duration until this thread. For some reason, you don't find the stories as funny as you did a couple years ago.

As an ex cop I will act as though I am before a judge and make an oath. My words regarding the objects being discussed, "are true, so help me God". You will not take that oath even though you claim to be atheist. If anyone knows the history, now is the time to come forward and shed light on the one committing perjury.
Roy, you are a liar and an idiot.