Care to elaborate or just saying a jackass commentGone.
When did he leave? Didn't see it mentioned on the board.
Who is leaving early?We need to start recruiting rb's big time. Snowreah gone now or moved to D and Peoples and Goodwin are gone after this year, with the outside possibility of a stud junior leaving early. I like Snead but better start getting more in the pipeline.
Care to elaborate or just saying a jackass comment
this would be a big loss whether injured or transferring, I remember some on here proclaiming him to be a much better recruit when he committed after Saquon Barkley decommitted...this is the kind of athlete that might have flourished in the spread or at least made contributions in the depleted secondary
NOBODY claimed that he was better than Barkley, some said that he had better straight line speed (and no, we don't believe Barkley's 4.38 time in Crappy Valley).
Reppin_Jerz showing why he is really Reppin PEDOPHILIA.
Peoples is very likely done with football, it's been pretty widely reported. Concussions...We need to start recruiting rb's big time. Snowreah gone now or moved to D and Peoples and Goodwin are gone after this year, with the outside possibility of a stud junior leaving early. I like Snead but better start getting more in the pipeline.
Snorweah absolutely was faster, and his track times confirmed that. His best times were faster than Barkley's best times, and he placed higher than Barkley in states.
But football speed is different than track speed, and whether Barkley was faster in pads is definitely up for debate.
He also squatted nearly 400 lbs, but the point remains, Snorweah was viewed by many here as a big time recruit and it is a big hit to the program to lose an athlete with that much potentialPretty sure it was reported that Barkley ran a 4.38 this spring. That's a damn nice 40 time for a RB.
He also squatted nearly 400 lbs, but the point remains, Snorweah was viewed by many here as a big time recruit and it is a big hit to the program to lose an athlete with that much potential
It hasn't, of course...people just like to speculate...But where has it been said, other than this thread, that we've lost him?
That's true, I should qualify my comments to say "IF he is gone..."But where has it been said, other than this thread, that we've lost him?
Would you take Barkley over Hicks and Martin?It hasn't, of course...people just like to speculate...
And no offense, but everyone on this board would take Barkley over Snorweah or almost any other back in the country - he's just that good.
Pretty sure it was reported that Barkley ran a 4.38 this spring. That's a damn nice 40 time for a RB.
Unofficial, and hand timed, not laser.
No way a kid that runs a no better than 4.50 (which is still Caroo speed) in high school improves to a 4.38 one year later.
Just shows how little faith to put in that 4.38.
Every day and twice on Sunday and I like Hicks and Martin a lot.Would you take Barkley over Hicks and Martin?
So you are making a RutgersAl statement that hicks and Martin are better than almost every other back in the country?Every day and twice on Sunday and I like Hicks and Martin a lot.
Re-read my post. I said I'd clearly take Barkley over Hicks and Martin. That says nothing about how good I think Hicks and Martin are.So you are making a RutgersAl statement that hicks and Martin are better than almost every other back in the country?
Not trying to give you a hard time but first you said nearly every poster here would take Barkley over most any other back in the country, you then said you'd take both hicks and Martin over Barkley everyday of the week...so what that means is your are implying you'd take hicks and Martin over almost every other back in the country...if you would take them doesn't that mean you think they are better?Re-read my post. I said I'd clearly take Barkley over Hicks and Martin. That says nothing about how good I think Hicks and Martin are.
If Barkley has a year like last year he's one kid that should go to the NFL early. I rarely say that and think a lot of times it's a mistake but this kid is that good. He has 1st rounder written all over him and will have a lot of miles left in the tank. Plus the Giants could use a RB.[winking]Re-read my post. I said I'd clearly take Barkley over Hicks and Martin. That says nothing about how good I think Hicks and Martin are.
Think you misread his post. I don't read it the way you do.Not trying to give you a hard time but first you said nearly every poster here would take Barkley over most any other back in the country, you then said you'd take both hicks and Martin over Barkley everyday of the week...so what that means is your are implying you'd take hicks and Martin over almost every other back in the country...if you would take them doesn't that mean you think they are better?
No I think he term is called something like logical inference, when you make two statements comparing similar circumstance you can infer on the third relationshipThink you misread his post. I don't read it the way you do.
Go back and read his original post.Not trying to give you a hard time but first you said nearly every poster here would take Barkley over most any other back in the country, you then said you'd take both hicks and Martin over Barkley everyday of the week...so what that means is your are implying you'd take hicks and Martin over almost every other back in the country...if you would take them doesn't that mean you think they are better?
Not trying to give you a hard time but first you said nearly every poster here would take Barkley over most any other back in the country, you then said you'd take both hicks and Martin over Barkley everyday of the week...so what that means is your are implying you'd take hicks and Martin over almost every other back in the country...if you would take them doesn't that mean you think they are better?
Every day and twice on Sunday and I like Hicks and Martin a lot.
Would you take Barkley over Hicks and Martin?
It hasn't, of course...people just like to speculate...
And no offense, but everyone on this board would take Barkley over Snorweah or almost any other back in the country - he's just that good.[/QUOTE
My observation based on the above statements by RU#####:
Hicks/Martin > Barkley > Snorweah/almost any other back in the country
I'm not trolling, I'm simply clarifying statements of opinion....calling it how I read it...
Theres not enough facepalms in the world.My observation based on the above statements by RU#####:
Hicks/Martin > Barkley > Snorweah/almost any other back in the country
I'm not trolling, I'm simply clarifying statements of opinion....calling it how I read it...