Damn Best Virginia, you sure have a hard on for Trump!
You sure you don't really just want to jump his bones? Go ahead admit it Dude, you think he's cute don't you? You like his little cowlick combover don't 'ya?
So Sessions will recuse himself...
- Thread starter WVex-pat in GA
- Start date
Damn Best Virginia, you sure have a hard on for Trump!
You sure you don't really just want to jump his bones? Go ahead admit it Dude, you think he's cute don't you? You like his little cowlick combover don't 'ya?
Damn Best Virginia, you sure have a hard on for Trump!
You sure you don't really just want to jump his bones? Go ahead admit it Dude, you think he's cute don't you? You like his little cowlick combover don't 'ya?
The Russians are right. It's McCarthyism all over again.
Damn, you morons are dumb. It is normal business and a good thing to talk to foreign leaders and diplomats while in an official position in order to work together on a world issue. It is against the law to assist a foreign government to spy on American citizens or interfere with the current Administration in an unofficial capacity with a foreign government or assist a foreign government in our election process. That is what we need answers to. I hope the investigation comes up with nothing but with so many under the Trump umbrella lying, something is being covered up. We need answers.
It is amazing you nuts can't understand this basic difference.
It is amazing you nuts can't understand this basic difference.
I just think the Left's hyperventilating over Russians is all they really have right now to try and discredit Trump. What they really are trying to do is stop him from dismantling Leviathan.
They could care less about the damn Russians....why were they so honky dory with Hillary selling them all that Uranium if they're so worried about helping Russia or what they may do to us?
Why were they so compliant as Obama sat and watched them annex Crimea (Korea according to Maxine Walters) Ukraine, and virtually run us out of Syria?
They're not even believable in their sudden outrage over Russia's flexing of its geopolitical muscle. 40 years ago, they worshiped Lenin and the Soviet Socialist experiment.
Still do. Who are they kidding?
Hey ********. Those have already been investigated and you are still wetting your pants over the findings since you are too dumb to understand them.
No you just go to hell, willya?
OK, so he says "I had no contact with the Russians" ... and that doesn't conflict with communicating with the Russians?
I'm finding out that a lot of words don't mean what I've thought they meant all these years ... this time "conflict".
" I had no contact with the Russians" is not the same as "I had contact with the Russians in an official capacity as a senator"
Besides all of that ... it has been said multiple times that he answered the question that was asked and he answered it honestly. He did neither of those things. The question was "what would you do if you found out .... " and he answered that he wasn't aware of any of that happening and that he had no contact with Russians.
I don't even understand how this is a gray area. He said what he said in response to a question asked ... it's on video, there's no denying what he said.
The only gray area is whether it's a big deal or how big of a deal it is.
It's not a big deal...the Media is hyping it to try and discredit Trump and anyone else associated with him.
lmfao, Obamas gone and Sessions didn't have a choice, the faulty analogies are hilarious. You guys have all three branches of Government and can't get out of the starting gate because the clown in charge doesn't have a clue and is scared to death the truth is gonna come out.
True countryroads89, but what is the crime? What was Sessions trying to hide when he "perjured" himself? Is he/was he under suspicion of committing a crime when he was asked if he'd ever had contact with any Russians?
Is he under indictment now for any criminal wrongdoing? Or is the entire Trump organization criminal because they helped the Russians help them steal the election?
We all know Hillary was supposed to win right?
I guess its like when the ***** lied to the FBI but Comey said there was no attempt to deceive.
The crime is perjury. It doesn't matter why or what anyone is trying to hide. Lying to Congress (under oath) is perjury.
Yes you're correct countryroads89. So why isn't Sessions being indicted? What was the crime he lied about under oath?
Was he under "oath" when he appeared before his Senate confirmation hearing countryroads89?
(I honestly don't know...can you tell me since that is your argument for "perjury"?)
Never mind countryroads89...I think this explains it and answers my question
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...perjury-confirmation-hearing-russia/98643620/
Hang his ***. Or better yet...send him North Korea and line him up before the anti-aircraft guns.
The entire section quotation is "I have been called a surrogate at a time or two in that campaign, and I did not have communications with the Russians"
As a surrogate, I never had communications. Had the ", and" not been there, you might have a point.
Yes, some things that got a hell of a lot of coverage, and they remain open. Stonewall, 5th, and lies are not appropriate methods recognized as resolution.
Also, the leaks surrounding the current issue needs further investigation. I don't care who is involved or how many. Career employs or political position should not get a bye. Nothing can be discussed in confidence in DC without the Times or Post having it as headlines in the next issue. Remember Osama in cave. He was being traced via use of his portable phone. This was discovered/discussed before 8 member bi-partisan congressional panel. The next day, media - Post and Times- were revealing tracking method and even put the model number of the phone in headlines.
Uh no ... But if he had said what you said "As a surrogate I never had communications" it wouldn't be a lie ... you're reading that into what he said, but that's not what he said. I have no doubt that's what he meant, and as I stated before I don't see how it's worth all of this hubbub. But at the same time, he's being questioned to be the AG, he should know how to correctly answer questions under oath so as to remove any ambiguity in interpretation.
Even at that ... he didn't come close to answering the question that was asked ... which had nothing to do with whether or not he spoke with the Russians, so it's odd that he would throw that out there anyway. "What would you do if you learned that the accusations were true and surrogates spoke with Russia?" .... "I didn't communicate with Russia"