With that logic life has to be easyYeah. That's why Jerry's career ended as soon as Montana retired. 12 years later.
With that logic life has to be easyYeah. That's why Jerry's career ended as soon as Montana retired. 12 years later.
Hopefully he can finally get some quality tail.Just glad to see things are finally going the right way for ol' Tom. He had a rough stretch there for a while.
well, that's true but it's also true that he's two of the biggest choke jobs in American sports history away from being 3-4. Then the narrative is completely different - lost his last 4 Super Bowls, basically John Elway in reverse.He's also two miracle plays from having seven Super Bowls.
Alright, lmfao.. a few things:
1. Lets not pretend that this still isn't Belichick as the mastermind.
2. For as unlucky as the two Giants superbowls may have been for the Pats, they just as much lucked out with Seattle not running the ball and Atlanta totally shitting their pants. It's equal, 2-2. Not to mention, cheating during the entire early run of their superbowls.
Very true. The Seahawks and Falcons basically handed Tom his last 2 SBs. If both of those teams just run the ball, Tom loses both.well, that's true but it's also true that he's two of the biggest choke jobs in American sports history away from being 3-4. Then the narrative is completely different - lost his last 4 Super Bowls, basically John Elway in reverse.
^The point was that the original poster said "If it weren't for lucky Giants catches.." or something or other. Patriots had plenty of luck go their way, if not more.
Also, if just one of the Jets/Bill/Miami could be a threat in the last 15 years, walking to the superbowl might seem impressive. 5-6 guaranteed wins, and the division every year.. which more often than not equates to the #1 seed, a Bye, Homefield, and playing the worst remaining team. I don't think it's as difficult as people think, to go to the superbowl, only needing to win two games at home.
The year the Pats had the 2nd seed? No HF and bounced by Denver.
That #1 seed (and even #2 seed) are huge.
J-E-T-S JETS JE.. Ah forget it.
Obviously I have some bias. But, I've also been around the Pats more than most. Watched most of their games. Nothing I said above is untrue, and I'm dogging my own team.
J-E-T-S JETS JE.. Ah forget it.
Obviously I have some bias. But, I've also been around the Pats more than most. Watched most of their games. Nothing I said above is untrue, and I'm dogging my own team.
If you don't think he is the GOAT, you have an unhealthy bias/hate. He just won the Super Bowl with a receiving corp that included: a former college QB, a lacrosse player who played one season of FCS football, a rookie, and a backup tight end. That is just ridiculous.
And for the person who said he could easily be 3-4 in Super Bowls ... he could be 7-0 too. But he isn't. He is 5-2 which is damn impressive.
And the fact he taped a post Super Bowl commercial that aired in Boston, referencing his "new fifth ring" just makes him that much more of a boss (http://www.mediaite.com/online/tom-...wing-fifth-super-bowl-ring-before-sundays-win). He backs it up.
Pretty stupid argument, putting Brady on GB instead of NE. If there's one thing that separates Brady from his peers is his drive, he's relentless in his pursuit of greatness. I love ARod, but maybe dude should put away the TV scripts and work a little more on his game if he wants to be compared to TB.
You should watch The Brady 6 show. On there, BB comments that theyonly thing stopping them from naming TB the starter over Bledsoe was experience, that Brady had the better PS. Bledoe's injury just made the decision easier for them.
Tom Brady is the GOAT to play QB in the NFL.