Softball Regionals Announced Today

615dawg

Well-known member
Jun 4, 2007
5,338
780
113
Our one and done in the SEC Tournament probably sealed our fate as a traveling 2 seed, but as we discussed last week, this team plays well on the road and if we get a good draw, this is a team that can make OKC.

We are projected to head to Stanford (overall 6 seed), which is matched up with Texas A&M in the Super Regional round. That would not be terrible, except for the travel to the West Coast. Let's take a look at what the projected bracket looks like:

SEC Hosts

Obviously we will not be sent to any of the SEC hosts, so here is a look at them, projected seed in parenthesis.

(4) Florida
(7) LSU
(8) Tennessee
(9) Missouri
(11) Texas A&M
(12) Georgia
(13) Arkansas
(16) Alabama

8 SEC hosts. Although I think Alabama is certainly on the bubble as a host (I personally think Arizona gets the last host spot over them). Here's something cool. We played five of these teams and won a game from all of them, and won the series against Georgia and Arkansas.

So that leaves us 8 (possibly 9 if Alabama doesn't host) landing spots.

(1) Oklahoma
(2) Texas
(3) Duke
(5) UCLA
(6) Stanford
(10) Oklahoma State
(14) Florida State
(15) Louisiana

For winning a regional, Florida State and Louisiana are the best spots to land. We swept Louisiana in the regular season and FSU is certainly beatable. The problem with playing Louisiana is that you likely have a incredibly tough Super Regional against Oklahoma or Texas, which you want to avoid as regionals as well. You also want to avoid UCLA.

So the best possible landing spots are:

Duke
Stanford
Oklahoma State
Florida State

Duke has had a nice season at 40-6, but the ACC is not strong and they did not play a tough non-conference. They dropped a game against a terrible Louisville team and a series against Virginia, which we are better than. Even if Duke is a top 4 seed, this is not a terrible draw, especially if they are matched up against Georgia in a Super Regional.

Stanford, our projected home is 43-13 against the 11th toughest schedule in the nation. This is a tougher draw than the higher ranked Duke team, but not on the level of Texas/Oklahoma.

Oklahoma State is 44-10, and finished third behind OU and Texas in the Big 12. They are good, but the rest of the Big 12 is not. Other than Baylor, the rest of the Big 12 has RPIs outside the Top 40 and Iowa State is in the 90s. Iowa State won the series against OSU. This is my preferred spot because I think they could be matched up with Arkansas in a Super Regional.

Florida State is 43-14 and somewhat battle tested, but they were 7-9 in Quad 1 games. We were 19-15. We have won in Tallahassee before, but there's a chance FSU would not have a favorable Super Regional matchup.
 

615dawg

Well-known member
Jun 4, 2007
5,338
780
113
Projection was right. We are the 2 seed at Stanford playing Fullerton.
Stanford is the 8 overall. Winnable regional. Let’s get it.

matched up with LSU in a potential Super. Cal is the 2 seed in Baton Rouge.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Dawgg

The Cooterpoot

Well-known member
Sep 29, 2022
3,259
4,876
113
That's not a winnable region IMO. Stanford has the best pitching staff in college softball and the best pitcher in college softball and top 3 on the planet. We won't touch her, nobody has much in two years. She took them deep in the CWS last year.
 

Dawgg

Well-known member
Sep 9, 2012
6,731
4,872
113
There is something kind of poetic (and very baseball) about playing Cal State Fullerton in a Stanford Regional.

Matched up with LSU at #9 for a potential Super. Yep, this is a baseball bracket.
 

ETK99

Well-known member
Jul 30, 2019
3,990
5,127
112
Going to be tough. Canady is the best in the country. OM got a better draw than us going to ULL. We really got no respect at all from the committee.
AL who finished 3 spots behind us in the SEC is hosting again....
If women's athletics wants to be taken seriously, they can't do this stuff.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dawgg

Dawgg

Well-known member
Sep 9, 2012
6,731
4,872
113
That's not a winnable region IMO. Stanford has the best pitching staff in college softball and the best pitcher in college softball and top 3 on the planet. We won't touch her, nobody has much in two years. She took them deep in the CWS last year.
I think it’s winnable. We’ve taken 1 or 2 from a lot of really good teams this year and that’s all we have to do here. Not a slam dunk by any means, but I wouldn’t call it unwinnable.
 

615dawg

Well-known member
Jun 4, 2007
5,338
780
113
That's not a winnable region IMO. M
Going to be tough. Canady is the best in the country. OM got a better draw than us going to ULL. We really got no respect at all from the committee.
AL who finished 3 spots behind us in the SEC is hosting again....
If women's athletics wants to be taken seriously, they can't do this stuff.
Alabama being a higher seed than A&M is criminal. Texas A&M finished third in the conference. Alabama finished 9th. 5 games behind them.
 

Dawgg

Well-known member
Sep 9, 2012
6,731
4,872
113
Ole Miss somehow gets in and Alabama hosts. Oof.
 

ETK99

Well-known member
Jul 30, 2019
3,990
5,127
112
I think it’s winnable. We’ve taken 1 or 2 from a lot of really good teams this year and that’s all we have to do here. Not a slam dunk by any means, but I wouldn’t call it unwinnable.
We haven't faced a pitcher as good as Canady. They aren't a great defensive team though. You never want to draw a top pitcher or play on the west coast. We got screwed. OM gets Baylor and ULL. We could win that. AL got nobody. AU got in and a better draw. It's a damn shame what women's athletics is. We could face the best pitcher and win and then face the second best pitcher in the country. AL got a 14 seed, so they avoid Texas and OK in supers and go to TN. It's about money 100% with women sites. We got given a 25th seed basically. We're a top 20 team and 6th in the SEC. AL is outside the top 20 and 9th in the SEC.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Dawgg

Dawgg

Well-known member
Sep 9, 2012
6,731
4,872
113
We haven't faced a pitcher as good as Canady. They aren't a great defensive team though. You never want to draw a top pitcher or play on the west coast. We got screwed.
Oh I think we got screwed too, but she’s not unbeatable. If we can manufacture a couple of runs, they still have to score too. If Kentucky can do it once, so can we… and that’s assuming she’s who we end up facing. If one of us ends up in the loser’s bracket, she may not even pitch against us.
 

ETK99

Well-known member
Jul 30, 2019
3,990
5,127
112
Oh I think we got screwed too, but she’s not unbeatable. If we can manufacture a couple of runs, they still have to score too. If Kentucky can do it once, so can we… and that’s assuming she’s who we end up facing. If one of us ends up in the loser’s bracket, she may not even pitch against us.
She was coming off an injury to start the season. Her ERA is .5. KY had no earned runs. We have to face her to advance no matter what. Likely twice at a minimum.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dawgg

MStateDawg

Active member
Aug 3, 2021
296
377
63
So, all 13 SEC teams are in the tourney.

Amazing. And Oklahoma seems to be the Big Dog.

Not only going to the tournament, but there are 8 SEC hosts plus Texas & OU hosting (10 total). Starting next year over half the hosts will be SEC schools. Also, 5 of the top 8 hosts for Super Regionals with OU & Texas.
 

The Cooterpoot

Well-known member
Sep 29, 2022
3,259
4,876
113
8 SEC hosts and we were 6th in the SEC and get shipped to Cali. OM gets in with the same record we got excluded with last year. We got royally screwed. LSU and AL who finished behind us are hosting and we'll have to go to LSU if we both win our regional. LSU was .500 (14-14) after starting the season 24-0. The last month plus they've struggled. AL hasn't been good all season.
 

615dawg

Well-known member
Jun 4, 2007
5,338
780
113
It does appear that we didn't do quite enough to host, but we should have been sent somewhere closer.

I have a friend that coaches softball at Belhaven - they have been top 10 all season and got shipped to St. Louis to an unranked host. Belhaven built a brand new stadium this year that is one of the best in the nation, especially at the D3 level. The NCAA just doesn't care about women's sports at any level.

Mississippi College hosted and advanced out of their regional. They are traveling for the Super to No. 15 despite being No. 4 in the nation.

Softball seems to care more about "regionalization" and getting teams from diverse areas of the country than getting the best teams on the field.
 

ETK99

Well-known member
Jul 30, 2019
3,990
5,127
112
It's about name recognition and money with women's athletics. Alabama getting a regional, and a really easy one at that, makes the committee look incompetent. They want the larger following teams to advance, so they rig it that way.
 

615dawg

Well-known member
Jun 4, 2007
5,338
780
113
It's about name recognition and money with women's athletics. Alabama getting a regional, and a really easy one at that, makes the committee look incompetent. They want the larger following teams to advance, so they rig it that way.
Yep. But in the case of Alabama, the next three teams up were Texas State, Arizona and Virginia Tech.

Arizona is a blue blood in the sport and no one would have blinked. The problem is making Alabama #14 and A&M #16. A&M should have been a top eight seed. Instead they are #16 matched up with #1 Texas.
 

The Cooterpoot

Well-known member
Sep 29, 2022
3,259
4,876
113
Yep. But in the case of Alabama, the next three teams up were Texas State, Arizona and Virginia Tech.

Arizona is a blue blood in the sport and no one would have blinked. The problem is making Alabama #14 and A&M #16. A&M should have been a top eight seed. Instead they are #16 matched up with #1 Texas.
Your last sentence is exactly what he's saying. They want that money maker matchup over doing what's right. Just like TN/AL are matched up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IBleedMaroonDawg