Solid analysis

CAJUNEER_rivals

Redshirt
May 29, 2001
72,872
44
0
I really miss him on the Daily Show. It's just not the same anymore. Almost like his assessment of Hilary, Trevor Noah is just playing a role, whereas Stewart was authentic in it.
Yeah, Noah and Wilmore are no Stewart and Colbert. They're neither clever nor funny. Boring.
 

Fingon

Junior
Dec 15, 2003
11,304
387
83
It's hard to even begin to list the things that make Hillary unlikable. It would be a massive list. Chief among them for me (and ironically, something I agree with Trump on) is that her facade of feminist warrior for justice flies in the face of her own history, with the way she helped to distance her husband from his sexual harrassment scandals (and in at least one case in the 70's, a likely rape) by disparaging victims and helping to lead the character assassinations of Bill's accusers. It flies in the face of everything a feminist would stand for. Yes, I understand that ideological obligations can fly in the face of marital realities. I get that a spouse needs to stick by their spouse above all others. But she could have done so in a way that wasn't so patently offensive. She could have 'stuck by' her man without defending his behavior. And she assuredly could have stood by Bill without attacking the character of his victims.

She is still miles better than Trump as a potential President, but as Stewart points out, being preferable to Trump would be equally true for any number of very awful and unqualified people.
 

WhiteTailEER

Sophomore
Jun 17, 2005
11,534
170
0
Yeah, Noah and Wilmore are no Stewart and Colbert. They're neither clever nor funny. Boring.

I tried Wilmore's show twice, I think. Couldn't do it. I've given Noah quite a chance, but the intelligence behind all of the humor just isn't there anymore.
 

mneilmont

Sophomore
Jan 23, 2008
20,883
166
0
It's hard to even begin to list the things that make Hillary unlikable. It would be a massive list. Chief among them for me (and ironically, something I agree with Trump on) is that her facade of feminist warrior for justice flies in the face of her own history, with the way she helped to distance her husband from his sexual harrassment scandals (and in at least one case in the 70's, a likely rape) by disparaging victims and helping to lead the character assassinations of Bill's accusers. It flies in the face of everything a feminist would stand for. Yes, I understand that ideological obligations can fly in the face of marital realities. I get that a spouse needs to stick by their spouse above all others. But she could have done so in a way that wasn't so patently offensive. She could have 'stuck by' her man without defending his behavior. And she assuredly could have stood by Bill without attacking the character of his victims.

She is still miles better than Trump as a potential President, but as Stewart points out, being preferable to Trump would be equally true for any number of very awful and unqualified people.
What, in your opinion, makes Hillary "miles better than Trump as a potential President"? Is it something moral? Something she has accomplished? Her foresight of where the country should be headed? Her leadership?

Or is it just a personal preference and satisfies your biases more closely? Not really miles in what she has to offer? Am I showing a blindness in not understanding her greatness? But, you didn't say she was great.