won't be a friend of the POTUS today. Doh! every man for himself. His opening statement is out. "everyone was in on it" or similar.
I thought bifftards moved the goal post to 'quid pro quo is not illegal'?Don't worry. The swallowers will still maintain this isn't a quid pro quo.
Nope. Some tried, but the infallible One made them stay with no quid pro quo.I thought bifftards moved the goal post to 'quid pro quo is not illegal'?
It will be funny when Sondland doesn't give the left what they want.
He has?LMAO! He already has.
hahahahhahaha!
You say this every day and you are always.....wait for it......wrong again. Poor little dummyLMAO! He already has.
hahahahhahaha!
Quid pro quo? We were told this is Bribery?He has?
Are you sure? A meeting at the White House is quid pro quo? What happened to the javelins? Wait, it's quid pro quo again?
What the AF is your claim?
He has?
Are you sure? A meeting at the White House is quid pro quo? What happened to the javelins? Wait, it's quid pro quo again?
What the AF is your claim?
You say this every day and you are always.....wait for it......wrong again. Poor little dummy
“Secretary Perry, Ambassador Volker, and I worked with Mr. Rudy Giuliani on Ukraine matters at the express direction of the president of the United States,” Sondland said. “We did not want to work with Mr. Giuliani. Simply put, we played the hand we were dealt. We all understood that if we refused to work with Mr. Giuliani, we would lose an important opportunity to cement relations between the United States and Ukraine. So we followed the president’s orders.”
https://www.thedailybeast.com/gordon-sondland-will-trash-rudy-giuliani-in-impeachment-hearing
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Great post, bama. Actual testimony under oath.
I am not exactly sure where that gets you. POTUS sets policy and he determines who is used to implement his policy.HAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Great post, bama. Actual testimony under oath.
I am not exactly sure where that gets you. POTUS sets policy and he determines who is used to implement his policy.
You mean the literal definition of the office of the Presidency? Aw mah gad! They got him now!! HahahahaI am not exactly sure where that gets you. POTUS sets policy and he determines who is used to implement his policy.
You’ve been asked numerous times as have your Dem reps in Congress. What law is he violating?POTUS doesn't set policy that violates the law.
F'ucking moron. It is incredible how f'ucking stupid you are.
Dis gon b good. Arrested for what? Please tell me the Logan Act.How long until Rudy is arrested?
No policy violated any law moron. Your anger doesnt make it true. There is a reason why everyone on this forum thinks it is you who are the idiot.POTUS doesn't set policy that violates the law.
F'ucking moron. It is incredible how f'ucking stupid you are.
POTUS does not have absolute authority on implementing policy or dictating policy. Are you suggesting Obama could have sold Florida to ISIS? Sold nukes to Iran? You simpletons are great. Congress passed the bills that control the purse strings. The President signed that bill. The President's executive branch approved the thresholds required for funds to be released. The President can't THEN pressure a foreign government to investigate an American citizen for POTUS's own political gain. Is that what you guys are arguing? L M A OYou mean the literal definition of the office of the Presidency? Aw mah gad! They got him now!! Hahahaha
When you dont have facts, just make them up. The money was delivered and there was nothing given in exchange by Ukraine for the money. Other than that...quality post TDSCoop.POTUS does not have absolute authority on implementing policy or dictating policy. Are you suggesting Obama could have sold Florida to ISIS? Sold nukes to Iran? You simpletons are great. Congress passed the bills that control the purse strings. The President signed that bill. The President's executive branch approved the thresholds required for funds to be released. The President can't THEN pressure a foreign government to investigate an American citizen for POTUS's own political gain. Is that what you guys are arguing? L M A O
Wait til one of them librul socialists gets to be President. They get to full autonomy to set policy, you guys!! :joy::joy::joy::joy:
POTUS does not have absolute authority on implementing policy or dictating policy. Are you suggesting Obama could have sold Florida to ISIS? Sold nukes to Iran? You simpletons are great. Congress passed the bills that control the purse strings. The President signed that bill. The President's executive branch approved the thresholds required for funds to be released. The President can't THEN pressure a foreign government to investigate an American citizen for POTUS's own political gain. Is that what you guys are arguing? L M A O
Wait til one of them librul socialists gets to be President. They get to full autonomy to set policy, you guys!! :joy::joy::joy::joy:
Sondland didnt testify to any of that.
When you dont have facts, just make them up. The money was delivered and there was nothing given in exchange by Ukraine for the money. Other than that...quality post TDSCoop.
Sondland didnt testify to any of that.
I mean if you need to take it to an extreme hyperbolic reactionary place to try and validate your position, I think it’s pretty easy to see how valid of an argument you have.POTUS does not have absolute authority on implementing policy or dictating policy. Are you suggesting Obama could have sold Florida to ISIS? Sold nukes to Iran? You simpletons are great. Congress passed the bills that control the purse strings. The President signed that bill. The President's executive branch approved the thresholds required for funds to be released. The President can't THEN pressure a foreign government to investigate an American citizen for POTUS's own political gain. Is that what you guys are arguing? L M A O
Wait til one of them librul socialists gets to be President. They get to full autonomy to set policy, you guys!! :joy::joy::joy::joy: