W will.ksr All-American Nov 18, 2008 5,358 7,422 0 May 29, 2023 #1 Reactions: kygrandpa, JasonRDunn and gobigbluebell
JRowland Hall of Famer Staff member May 29, 2001 35,533 255,022 113 May 29, 2023 #2 YaketySax said: Click to expand... Incorrect. Dellenger says that would be a one year solution until a possible 9 game schedule in 2025. Reactions: kygrandpa, JasonRDunn, JDHoss and 3 others
YaketySax said: Click to expand... Incorrect. Dellenger says that would be a one year solution until a possible 9 game schedule in 2025.
RACdad All-American Mar 8, 2005 8,985 8,555 113 May 30, 2023 #3 I'll take that over MSU Reactions: satcheluk
S satcheluk All-Conference Oct 4, 2009 3,092 4,312 113 May 30, 2023 #4 Maybe I'm in the minority, but I really don't care who the permanent opponent is other than to hope it someone we can beat more than 50% of the time. I'd be fine with no permanent opponents if you could play every team once every two years. Last edited: Jun 3, 2023 Reactions: Anon1660081258 and kygrandpa
Maybe I'm in the minority, but I really don't care who the permanent opponent is other than to hope it someone we can beat more than 50% of the time. I'd be fine with no permanent opponents if you could play every team once every two years.
K Kats meow Senior Nov 16, 2021 733 873 53 May 30, 2023 #5 JRowland said: Incorrect. Dellenger says that would be a one year solution until a possible 9 game schedule in 2025. Click to expand... Not to be a smart aleck, but our “permanent” opponent will be in place for one year? Reactions: kygrandpa and vhcat70
JRowland said: Incorrect. Dellenger says that would be a one year solution until a possible 9 game schedule in 2025. Click to expand... Not to be a smart aleck, but our “permanent” opponent will be in place for one year?