Stay the course

needmorecowbell

Heisman
Oct 28, 2007
9,660
10,810
78
I have seen enough from recruiting, program building and offensive/defensive scheme to feel confident in Ash's plan. Yesterday was not good but it does not change my optimism for the program. RU needs players at every position. Unfortunately next year may look worse before it gets better due The lack of recruiting the past 3 years. Go ahead and panic if that's your M.O. but the second half of the season has plenty of opportunity and I expect a much different team than we saw yesterday.
 

Knight Shift

Heisman
May 19, 2011
88,883
86,892
113
I have seen enough from recruiting, program building and offensive/defensive scheme to feel confident in Ash's plan. Yesterday was not good but it does not change my optimism for the program. RU needs players at every position. Unfortunately next year may look worse before it gets better due The lack of recruiting the past 3 years. Go ahead and panic if that's your M.O. but the second half of the season has plenty of opportunity and I expect a much different team than we saw yesterday.
I admire your positive outlook in a sea of whining, but we don't know how recruiting will be until NSD. Defensive schemes and tackling look better. Offensive schemes, this board will debate endlessly whether it is the bad schemes or bad fit of personnel for the schemes Mehringer is running. Was listening to the pregame WCTC yesterday, and David Milewski made a couple of good points--perhaps RU should have slowed down the offense to give the defense time to breathe yesterday. Also, while Milewski did not say this, can he design more than 1 play in the last 2 games that involves a deep route? (Cue the Laviano can't throw posts). Laviano has shown an ability to throw and connect on deep balls. Yes, Carroo is gone and Grant is out, but we still have Harris. While it was not a deep ball (more like intermediate), he hit Patton right in stride, and he dropped the ball. The constant runs pounding it up the middle get tiresome to watch.

That said, my overall outlook is positive. I would not measure a beginning tennis player's ability by playing Nadal or Federer, and I will not judge the team and coaches by the Washington, Ohio State and Michigan games. Stanford looked worse than RU against Washington. So we have that going for us.

Still believe we have winnable games against Indiana (yeah they beat MSU, who looks down this year), Illinois, Minnesota, PSU, and Maryland (so what they are 4-0 against nobody), and throw MSU into the mix. How this team responds to the beat down will tell a lot about what kind of team this is.

Negatoids unite and start picking apart everything I said. [banana]
 

DocRU

Senior
Dec 28, 2002
3,600
626
113
I'm positive about Ash and his plan. The biggest head scratcher for me is QB.
Whatever is happening in practice has not carried over to the games.
When the B1G Network crew viewed RU practices in camp, their opinion was that Allen would win the job. Gio runs one into the end zone, and gets nailed to the bench. Rettig has looked competent in every game he has been allowed to play, all last year. His throws in pregame warmups still look (to me) sharper than anyone else.
I understand Oden is the guy. He may not be ready yet, but Ash made the decision to play him this year anyway, and leapfrog everyone else on the depth chart. So play him! Ash has already wasted games investing valuable playing time on Laviano. The result is the worst rated QB in the league, and the Iowa loss.
 

needmorecowbell

Heisman
Oct 28, 2007
9,660
10,810
78
I admire your positive outlook in a sea of whining, but we don't know how recruiting will be until NSD. Defensive schemes and tackling look better. Offensive schemes, this board will debate endlessly whether it is the bad schemes or bad fit of personnel for the schemes Mehringer is running. Was listening to the pregame WCTC yesterday, and David Milewski made a couple of good points--perhaps RU should have slowed down the offense to give the defense time to breathe yesterday. Also, while Milewski did not say this, can he design more than 1 play in the last 2 games that involves a deep route? (Cue the Laviano can't throw posts). Laviano has shown an ability to throw and connect on deep balls. Yes, Carroo is gone and Grant is out, but we still have Harris. While it was not a deep ball (more like intermediate), he hit Patton right in stride, and he dropped the ball. The constant runs pounding it up the middle get tiresome to watch.

That said, my overall outlook is positive. I would not measure a beginning tennis player's ability by playing Nadal or Federer, and I will not judge the team and coaches by the Washington, Ohio State and Michigan games. Stanford looked worse than RU against Washington. So we have that going for us.

Still believe we have winnable games against Indiana (yeah they beat MSU, who looks down this year), Illinois, Minnesota, PSU, and Maryland (so what they are 4-0 against nobody), and throw MSU into the mix. How this team responds to the beat down will tell a lot about what kind of team this is.

Negatoids unite and start picking apart everything I said. [banana]
KS,
I agree. When I say recruiting, I mean their effort and tactics. Results can vary but it's easy to see they have turned around the culture in just a few months. Regarding the schedule, OSU and Michigan are clear cut 1 and 2. After that anyone is beatable. Ash has his work cut out for him but I expect the rest of the season (after Michigan) to close like Iowa.
 

RutgersB1G

Freshman
Sep 10, 2016
191
61
0
Sorry, but saying "stay the course" after losing by more than 50 points in a conference game seems ridiculous. When we came into the Big Ten, we were a respectable team that qualified for a bowl that we also won. Two years later, it is Terry Shea football. This is not okay or acceptable.
 

needmorecowbell

Heisman
Oct 28, 2007
9,660
10,810
78
Sorry, but saying "stay the course" after losing by more than 50 points in a conference game seems ridiculous. When we came into the Big Ten, we were a respectable team that qualified for a bowl that we also won. Two years later, it is Terry Shea football. This is not okay or acceptable.
You would prefer panic? We were a respectable team before RU lost its recruiting edge. You can rebuild that over night.
 

WhiteBus

Heisman
Oct 4, 2011
39,520
21,922
113
Do we really need a thread like this? Its just his 4th game. With Flood's players.
 

Knight Shift

Heisman
May 19, 2011
88,883
86,892
113
KS,
I agree. When I say recruiting, I mean their effort and tactics. Results can vary but it's easy to see they have turned around the culture in just a few months. Regarding the schedule, OSU and Michigan are clear cut 1 and 2. After that anyone is beatable. Ash has his work cut out for him but I expect the rest of the season (after Michigan) to close like Iowa.
We are in complete agreement. [cheers]
On recruiting, however, SOME recruits may see the blowouts and consider going elsewhere. That is why it is important that RU at least competes and wins SOME of the aforementioned games. Also, we can't have any other scandals or nonsense like we had with Julie outside the football program. Flood was already recruiting with a huge handicap because he inherently was not a great recruiter, but he also got his legs cut out from underneath by all of the Julie drama and the faux abuse scandal. Make no bones about it, blowout losses played into too. That is why the games remaining after Michigan are extremely important. I'm going to lie low on these boards for the next couple of weeks because I can't stand the gloom and doom nonsense and drama that is permeating the boards.
 

Blitz Pakage

Junior
May 16, 2008
436
219
0
Sorry, but saying "stay the course" after losing by more than 50 points in a conference game seems ridiculous. When we came into the Big Ten, we were a respectable team that qualified for a bowl that we also won. Two years later, it is Terry Shea football. This is not okay or acceptable.

Yes we were respectable in year 1. The Schiano recruits were still fresh then and Flood road the coattails of those recruits and accepted the credit for it. He did nothing to reload that type of talent. Look at the talent level he has left you now. Hence the blowouts. Which most knew were coming.
 
May 11, 2010
72,487
56,951
0
Sorry, but saying "stay the course" after losing by more than 50 points in a conference game seems ridiculous. When we came into the Big Ten, we were a respectable team that qualified for a bowl that we also won. Two years later, it is Terry Shea football. This is not okay or acceptable.

Blame Flood
 

17Q66

All-Conference
Mar 17, 2015
1,571
1,224
0
Sorry, but saying "stay the course" after losing by more than 50 points in a conference game seems ridiculous. When we came into the Big Ten, we were a respectable team that qualified for a bowl that we also won. Two years later, it is Terry Shea football. This is not okay or acceptable.
I think it's best if we make it clear that Ash lacks the support of Rutgers fans. I mean, look at what that did for Kyle Flood's 2014 recruiting class.
 

FELONIOUSMONK

All-American
Apr 1, 2012
11,909
5,090
0
Go the distance. Ease his pain.if you build it.Is this heaven? No its Iowa.Who we should have beaten and may have beeen the last chance we have for a W.But after 50 years I will stay the course for another 50 I guess.
 

Duff366

All-Conference
Jan 6, 2006
7,927
1,559
0
Did anyone really think we were going to be competive with OSU??? Best case scenario would have been 45-10 in my opinion. Why are people acting like they are shocked that we weren't competitive.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AshSaturday

sct1111

All-American
Nov 30, 2014
6,115
8,402
113
We got blown out by two what probably will be playoff teams at their places. Relax.
 

devoted2ru

All-Conference
Nov 27, 2006
5,432
2,796
0
In terms of talent, in many ways Ash inherited what equates to a gutted building and unfortunately, you can't fix that kind of thing overnight. The man is a college HC, after all, not a magician.

The previous regime's recruiting left the new coaching staff with a huge repair job on its hands, and that kind of thing can only be overcome by bringing the kind of players into the program who can actually compete effectively in the B1G. And so far, this staff has shown it's more than willing to put in the relentless recruiting effort needed to do it. But even so, it's going to take time to get things going in the direction we all want.

That reality undoubtedly isn't something we'd choose if we had our preference, but that's simply the way it is.
 

JonathanAlan

Heisman
Jan 14, 2002
6,497
10,276
113
What's killing Rutgers , and it showed on saturday, is lack of quality receivers and no quarterback. Amazing how much better the team would be if they had any sense of a passing attack . Not only would the offense be better but so would the defense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sct1111

RUsince52

All-Conference
Apr 3, 2016
6,821
2,046
0
There is absolutely zero chance of beating anybody unless CL can at least generate some passing yards like he had in the 2 W' s. I say CL because that's all we know. Oden isn't allowed to throw as part of the game plan yet, so that doesn't help the cause. If we can fix the offense just enough than it will be on the defense to give us a chance to win.
Every team we face the rest of the season already have enough offense to win games so nothing will come easy.
Some offense = some hope !
 

AshSaturday

Junior
Apr 9, 2016
1,646
344
0
Though I liked him didn't Bob Wenzel used to say that? After years 1 (read that also Jordan and Van Gundy) and perhaps 2 not so sure that helped him.

Has anyone mentioned Grant and Lambert in this thread yet?