Exactly!!!! You can't get the talent, create a system the enhances what you have!
And also create a system that attracts talent. Nobody wants to play in a system that is lucky to score three times a game and is unimaginative as eff.
Exactly!!!! You can't get the talent, create a system the enhances what you have!
Exactly. Slater was a first round pick at 305#, and is one of the best in the NFL at 315#. There is much more to it than just weight.
I’m not expecting 330 from 6’3 guys. Unless they’re built that way.
But why not 305, 310, 315? The only OL we have that “shouldn’t” be there is Skoronski because he relies on his athleticism. I’m fine with our LT being 6’3 295 with what he’s done. And Priebe gets a pass given he’s a second year player.
Gerak, Schmidt, and Wiederkehr should each be 15 pounds heavier by now. They are too lean. Where’s the beef?
Truth is our OL and offensive play has gone south ever since we lost Larry Lilja. Effing dumbass woke progressives drove him off. Fitz should do the right thing by bringing him back. He's been so much a part of our previous success over multiple regimes. It wasn't right the way he left and it should be fixed, not just to fix our size and strength issues.
Then hire another S&C coach like him who actually played OL in the Big Ten and knows what it takes.No woke progressives drove off Lilja. He did it to himself. And there’s zero chance he ever comes back.
Then hire another S&C coach like him who actually played OL in the Big Ten and knows what it takes.
Hooten and Spanos haven’t gotten the job done to effectively beef up our trenches. So find a coach who will.
Did anyone else see the before and after photos of OSU linemen in the first season that Urban Meyer took them over? It was jaw dropping.
Give me 24 hours to review the game tape. Then I’m going to unload.The bizarre thing about this thread title @CatManTrue is that there's really not much more the coaches could do in a game like this.
Michigan just had a much better team today. That's it. Their players executed, and ours didn't.
There was much to point out about the defensive situation against Nebraska, Michigan State, and the first half of Duke, but it's hard to point out those kinds of coaching flaws today.
Today, our players just didn't execute at the same level that Michigan's did. There wasn't some glaring defensive scheme issues with Michigan just ripping off 50+ yard plays at will and our players either being confused or out of position or taking bad angles on many plays.
I'm not even sure what more Bajakian can do with our offense right now; Hilinski has to more accurately throw some of these passes. That's not really something the coaches can control.
This looked like the same team that beat Rutgers last week but just faced a team that's top 10 instead of bottom 20.
This team is playing at a reasonable level for the personnel that we have available in the past 2 games.
Huh?Truth is our OL and offensive play has gone south ever since we lost Larry Lilja. Effing dumbass woke progressives drove him off. Fitz should do the right thing by bringing him back. He's been so much a part of our previous success over multiple regimes. It wasn't right the way he left and it should be fixed, not just to fix our size and strength issues.
I've seen this comment too much. THEY ARE NOT REBUILDING. there are a bunch of upperclassmen/transfers playing and a few already established underclassmen. For every Gallagher, there are two or three Clairs. I like our guys, but am only seeing a few poised to "breakout" next year.It is the coaches and the players. Fans don't want to blame the players at all because "they are just kids", but anyone who has ever played knows that players usually bear most of the credit or blame.
Northwestern was one of the most experienced teams in 2020. In 2021, the Wildcats are one of the most inexperienced teams. This being a rebuilding season makes a lot of sense.
Strength coaches can only work with the players they’re given. We haven’t given them good enough players, or at least ones with enough physical potential.
The bizarre thing about this thread title @CatManTrue is that there's really not much more the coaches could do in a game like this.
Michigan just had a much better team today. That's it. Their players executed, and ours didn't.
There was much to point out about the defensive situation against Nebraska, Michigan State, and the first half of Duke, but it's hard to point out those kinds of coaching flaws today.
Today, our players just didn't execute at the same level that Michigan's did. There wasn't some glaring defensive scheme issues with Michigan just ripping off 50+ yard plays at will and our players either being confused or out of position or taking bad angles on many plays.
I'm not even sure what more Bajakian can do with our offense right now; Hilinski has to more accurately throw some of these passes. That's not really something the coaches can control.
This looked like the same team that beat Rutgers last week but just faced a team that's top 10 instead of bottom 20.
This team is playing at a reasonable level for the personnel that we have available in the past 2 games.
Yeah, I said the same thing in the fan thread after the game. We have a lot of grads playing. This program will be in flux for at least a couple more seasons.I've seen this comment too much. THEY ARE NOT REBUILDING. there are a bunch of upperclassmen/transfers playing and a few already established underclassmen. For every Gallagher, there are two or three Clairs. I like our guys, but am only seeing a few poised to "breakout" next year.
We just don't have the personnel right now.The die was cast before the season began. Coaches recruit, develop and game plan. If they don’t have the horses, it’s their own fault. If you want to blame the institution, then that’s a permanent problem so stop wasting money on P5 coaches salaries.
Yeah, I said the same thing in the fan thread after the game. We have a lot of grads playing. This program will be in flux for at least a couple more seasons.
It looks fairly obvious that we are a very soft program.We have no push. At all. Especially on the right side of the line where we’re often over powered.
Do you recall the days when we had two 350 pounders at RG and RT in Ndukwe and Strief? And how well they got the job done against OSU in 2004 and others?
Again, where’s the beef? I don’t think we need 350 pounders unless they’re freaks. But what’s wrong with having a few 310+ OL in the Big Ten?
Skoronski and Priebe look like they have 23 inch arms.It looks fairly obvious that we are a very soft program.
I doubt we practice full go as much as we should. The result is that we are pretty soft in september.
We also have a soft developmental program. Our OL have 16 inch arms. Michigan 23 inch. We do win on the mid section though.
I do not know what game you were watching but it apparently was not this one. The D was so much better in this game than the games prior to the bye. They were in position to make the plays but unfortunately they were unable to get off the field on 3rd down and that eventually wore them down.We must have watched two different games today. Michigan ran the ball at will against us. 294 yards on the ground at a 5.4 ypc clip. I guess that’s better than what MSU and UNL did but not by much. We’re entering 2002 territory on defense. If not for Azema’s forced fumble near the goalline, the score would have been uglier.
Our offense hasn’t really clicked in a game yet. Injuries play a big part but so does not hitting the transfer portal hard in the offseason for more OL.
And there’s simply nothing special about our special teams. Adams had a nice punt in the first quarter, which was that unit’s highlight of the day.
And half of them having to retire from FB before they see the field doesn't help eitherI’m not arguing with you. Lack of size in OL recruiting has been an issue for a while (along with recruiting way too many nice suburban soft kids, IMO). But some extra pounds wouldn’t suddenly make Charlie Schmidt able to pass block or move people off the ball.
This year MIch went back to their roots and has focused on running the ball. They have been pretty successful at it all year The scheme was good and guys in position to make plays unlike the first half of the season, They were actually playing pretty well till they got run down by being on the field too long. I look at this loss more on the lack of O than the DWe must have watched two different games today. Michigan ran the ball at will against us. 294 yards on the ground at a 5.4 ypc clip. I guess that’s better than what MSU and UNL did but not by much. We’re entering 2002 territory on defense. If not for Azema’s forced fumble near the goalline, the score would have been uglier.
Our offense hasn’t really clicked in a game yet. Injuries play a big part but so does not hitting the transfer portal hard in the offseason for more OL.
And there’s simply nothing special about our special teams. Adams had a nice punt in the first quarter, which was that unit’s highlight of the day.
We are missing half our weapons this year.And also create a system that attracts talent. Nobody wants to play in a system that is lucky to score three times a game and is unimaginative as eff.
Might as well toss in a LB or two as well. This group is really going to miss Bergin. Oh, and as long as we're making a list, a dependable PK would be nice.
This Michigan team is way overrated and they still dominated us.This year MIch went back to their roots and has focused on running the ball. They have been pretty successful at it all year The scheme was good and guys in position to make plays unlike the first half of the season, They were actually playing pretty well till they got run down by being on the field too long. I look at this loss more on the lack of O than the D
Bigtime overrated.This Michigan team is way overrated and they still dominated us.
Who have they beaten? A 3-4 Washington team? A mediocre Wisconsin team? They beat what will ultimately be a losing Nebraska team by 3. Sure; that Nebraska team destroyed us but has looked bad otherwise (by getting blown out, we probably saved Frost’s job for another season though!).
That Michigan team will battle another overrated MSU team and the media will fawn over it. But they’re going to get wrecked again by OSU. And then again in the bowl game by whomever they face from the SEC.
Meanwhile I have a bad feeling about this Minnesota game. Hopefully Marty can ride in again and save the day.
I watched a TCU team with OL of 265-275 destroy a good Wisconsin team in a bowl game a few years ago. NU has to recognize that a change in scheme is necessary. Last year Ramsey bailed out NU despite terrible OL play. If your OL is inadequate, don't rely on a power running game. The first few plays against UM seemingly were designed to avoid this problem but execution was poorAn extra 5 or 10 or 15 pounds isn’t gonna suddenly make those guys appreciably better players.
Yes better. Good enough to beat Duke, good enough to lose but not have gotten humiliated by Neb. Not sure good enough yet to hold the remaining opponents in check, but all of those teams are up and down, so... maybeI do not know what game you were watching but it apparently was not this one. The D was so much better in this game than the games prior to the bye. They were in position to make the plays but unfortunately they were unable to get off the field on 3rd down and that eventually wore them down.
If you want to challenge the O, I do not have a problem but the D was in good position which they were not in the first few games
I think Michigan has always been a run-first team under Harbaugh. Gattis at OC has mixed things up more and made them a bit more balanced with a combination of quick stretch passes to the perimeter and deep shots mixed in, but philosophically they've always wanted to run the ball like this. It's just that this year they have the proper personnel to do it effectively - at least against the opponents they've played thus far. Will be interesting to see how that approach holds up against MSU, PSU, and OSU in the coming weeks.This year MIch went back to their roots and has focused on running the ball. They have been pretty successful at it all year The scheme was good and guys in position to make plays unlike the first half of the season, They were actually playing pretty well till they got run down by being on the field too long. I look at this loss more on the lack of O than the D
You’re talking about the 2011 Rose Bowl. TCU did not destroy Wisconsin by any means.I watched a TCU team with OL of 265-275 destroy a good Wisconsin team in a bowl game a few years ago. NU has to recognize that a change in scheme is necessary. Last year Ramsey bailed out NU despite terrible OL play. If your OL is inadequate, don't rely on a power running game. The first few plays against UM seemingly were designed to avoid this problem but execution was poor
Agree. This is the most factual statement in the entire post. Don't think they are not already working on it!I think we can accelerate if we take 3-5 transfer OL this cycle to bring that position group up to snuff.
I suggested we should have done this after last season on the Rock and was told off.Agree. This is the most factual statement in the entire post. Don't think they are not already working on it!
Because the OL Coach told everyone that he was good and would stand pat with his guys. It looked like like we would snare an incredible incoming class, but frankly we did not. He miscalculated.I suggested we should have done this after last season on the Rock and was told off.
So why didn’t we do this starting in January?
Because the OL Coach told everyone that he was good and would stand pat with his guys. It looked like like we would snare an incredible incoming class, but frankly we did not. He miscalculated.
This was another thread. I wanted to say that it would be even better if the guys paid $100k+ or better could do so. Sad that the unpaid folks around here do about the same level of accuracy in identifying talent. But you can’t fire the fans..until you hire and pay them. Now those guys that are pay handsomely to accomplish this same task…why can’t people tell the difference between bad coaching and bad players?
You need to spend more time with us regular folks on the free board perhaps.I suggested we should have done this after last season on the Rock and was told off.
So why didn’t we do this starting in January?
Who has OSU beaten this year?This Michigan team is way overrated and they still dominated us.
Who have they beaten? A 3-4 Washington team? A mediocre Wisconsin team? They beat what will ultimately be a losing Nebraska team by 3. Sure; that Nebraska team destroyed us but has looked bad otherwise (by getting blown out, we probably saved Frost’s job for another season though!).
That Michigan team will battle another overrated MSU team and the media will fawn over it. But they’re going to get wrecked again by OSU. And then again in the bowl game by whomever they face from the SEC.
Meanwhile I have a bad feeling about this Minnesota game. Hopefully Marty can ride in again and save the day.
No one of note, except Oregon is pretty good. It’s just the fact that OSU has owned Harbaugh.Who has OSU beaten this year?
Ohio State didn't beat Oregon.No one of note, except Oregon is pretty good. It’s just the fact that OSU has owned Harbaugh.
1. Our coaches must find etc. players who pass the Fitz fit test. Good luck with that. It’s a very strict test. You need some players on the prick side of that line too. Then it’s up to the coaches to make it work. Happens with success everywhere.Our coaches are paid small fortunes to find, recruit, develop, and retain talented football players.
If we were to do an honest assessment of our coaching staff, we would find that it is lacking in several ways. And it’s showing this year with Saint Hankwitz retired. We’ve been embarrassed by two quality B1G teams and demolished by one mediocre one (Nebraska). And don’t get me started about the debacle in Durham.
Hopefully our coaching staff can get it together, Marty returns, and we can eke three more wins for a bowl game. But there’s a real possibility that we’ll go 3-9 again. I thought Illannoy would be a guaranteed win but they had one of their best wins in years today.
And another 3-9 (or 4-8) season should mean that everyone on the coaching at staff gets a real review. At least the 2019 team had a competitive defense (except against dOSU).
If the players have to constantly compete for their jobs… then why don’t the coaches?