You can, of course, look them up for yourself, if you were actually interested.
But just in reply to your comment regarding Women's soccer. Women's Soccer has won 2 Big Ten titles, and tied for another, under Barbour. Women's soccer remains, so far, one of Penn State Athletics' top performers. No doubt. But, in that same time frame before Barbour, they won 4 Big Ten titles, and tied for another. So what "methodology" would you employ to say the sport is rising under Barbour?
Football, before Barbour, had an average placement of just a hair better than 4th in the Conference. Since Barbour (and Franklin) between 6th and 7th in the conference (I see that doesn't yet include this year, 2021, so it would be a little worse than that now). Yes, there are two more teams, but Rutgers and Maryland are not exactly programs that would drive Penn State down in the rankings every year.

And National Championships? Before Barbour, 10 in Big Ten sponsored sports, along with 4 others in non-Big Ten sports (Fencing (3), and Men's Volleyball IIRC). Since Barbour, 6 in Big Ten sponsored sports (4 of them, IIRC, in Wrestling, and 1 in Women's Soccer and maybe 1 in Women's Volleyball), and 1 in Fencing. Is that "progress", or "decline"?
Last year, the average placement of all Penn State sports teams within the Big Ten standings - even after accounting for the additional members - was the worst ever. Period.
Penn State competed in 27 Big Ten sanctioned sports. On average, each of those sports had 11 1/2 competitors (not all schools compete in every sport), and Penn State's average placement was just a bit above 7th out of those 11 1/2. That is a stunning drop off from a program that led the entire conference in Titles during the same period of time before Barbour.
"Comprehensive Excellence"