I am not sure there is any weighted argument.
First two albums are so fine.
Live they were fire.
I wish there were more like them.
First two albums are so fine.
Live they were fire.
I wish there were more like them.
They played a great song at Louisville Gardens. A song. One song.I am not sure there is any weighted argument.
First two albums are so fine.
Live they were fire.
I wish there were more like them.
They were the first band my niece ever saw as a Christmas present from me.Kings of Leon
It pains me to say this but Eric Clapton up in Indy about 15 years ago. If he didn't want to be there (which he clearly didn't) then cancel. He played maybe an hour with barely more energy than a corpse, ended with Somewhere Over the Rainbow with no encore, and got into an argument with someone as mad as me when he walked off. If he didn't want to be there than he just should have canceled. That would have pissed me off less.I like the Black Crows music. That said , I saw them at the Louisville Palace about 10-12 years ago and it was the worst concert that I have had the displeasure to attend. Chris Robinson just mumbled lyrics and did a stupid bare foot hippie dance on a prayer rug all night. The band purposely cranked their amps to drown him out. It was a complete crap show. I heard that they broke up again shortly thereafter.
Guns and Roses were popular about the same time as the Black Crows. They were bigger, better and more impactful than the Crows.
I am not sure there is any weighted argument.
First two albums are so fine.
Live they were fire.
I wish there were more like them.
Very true but all bands could be described like that. There is always an influence that is borrowed. Music, especially pop music, doesn't happen in a vacuum. A 'new' band has absorbed many different influences before they ever release the first song.I like the Crowe's, good band, but they did not move the needle, innovate, or change any direction. It's a sound we've heard before. To call them great is an overstatement.
I' After he introduced us, she asked if I'd like to go on the bus and meet the band. I looked at her and said "I'm here to hang out with Ken, not to meet a band that sucks. But I wouldn't mind meeting Gary Clark Jr." He was opening for them on that tour but wasn't available right then.
I saw Gary Clark Jr at forecastle once and he tore it up something fierce.
Agree but they did nothing new with what they were influenced by. Still a good band.Very true but all bands could be described like that. There is always an influence that is borrowed. Music, especially pop music, doesn't happen in a vacuum. A 'new' band has absorbed many different influences before they ever release the first song.
I mean, they're good, but never got the major hype from a lot of people on this board. Just going for bands contemporary with them or more recent:
Black Keys >>> Black Crowes. Give me any of Foo Fighters, RHCP, REM, Rage Against the Machine, Soundgarden, The White Stripes, The Flaming Lips...
I love Beck and was still shocked at how great his show at Forecastle was.Yeah if you're including solo artists he's way up there and I'd throw in Beck as well. If Alabama Shakes will get their asses back together and make a couple more albums they'll move up.
Same, I was at that show and he was damn goodI love Beck and was still shocked at how great his show at Forecastle was.
This is objectively false. Foo Fighters, The Black Keys, and The White Stripes are all very large bands that are great and more enjoyable than The Black Crows.I am not sure there is any weighted argument.
First two albums are so fine.
Live they were fire.
I wish there were more like them.
GotSA and Foo Fighters are hands down better than the Black Rowes, IMO. Though there are a lot of bands I enjoy more than the BCs.-qotsa is the best working american rock-'n'-roll band of the last decade.
-love the strokes...qotsa is a better "rock" band.