BobMartin
Prospect
18 posts this site
Ignore this Member
Send Private Message
"John G. Blanchard, a former senior associate athletic director, says rumor and innuendo have unfairly tarnished the reputation of the Academic Support Program for Student-Athletes, whose counselors advise players on course selection, among other things. The counselors are paid by the athletics department but report to an associate dean.
"If a course is offered at the university and faculty are teaching it, it is not up to the person who works with student-athletes to see that the course is not fraudulent," Mr. Blanchard says. "That's not their job. The academic counselors have gotten a really bad rap, and it's been totally unfair."
Excuse me, John; but ASPSA has been the most shielded and coddled entity in this whole debacle. Tainted? Unfairly? Well, I guess that's something, because no one from that citadel of learning is being held accountable. It's everyone else's fault: teaching faculty, CAS deans, assistant, media, athletes (at least those that speak out negatively). Heck, even the athletic department has been allowed to take the hit for "lax recruiting." But those academic advisors? Nope. Clean as a whistle and unfairly maligned by Willingham, Smith and the N&O.
Yet, wasn't it you, John, and then-ASPSA boss Robert Mercer, who claimed you raised concerns about the classes to the FAC in the early part of the 2000s decade? Why? It wasn't yours or Mercer's job to question faculty's teaching. Yet you did. (Right?) What happened?
And explain to me why the revealed email exchanges between Nyang'oro/Crowder and the ASPSA people aren't taint-worthy evidence? President Ross said he'd look into them, and that was ages ago. Since then, not a peep. I trust the Wainstein report will cover that.
No, Mr. Blanchard. I disagree with you on the "unfairly" score. Bradley Bethel has led the campaign to defend ASPSA's jump circle, and at every turn, the official unc response has sought to assign responsibility for whatever failure is acknowledged to anyone but ASPSA. If the worst that ASPSA gets is a good tainting, then I'd say they were lucky indeed. What's unfair is the maligning of unc's entire academic integrity and the reputation hit its vast majority of students and teachers have taken because the university has chosen to conclude this is an "academic scandal, which is worse." Imagine this being deemed an athletic scandal, with championship titles vacated and penalties imposed, and tell me with a straight face that unc advocates would not find that to be worse.
"Unfairly tainted." What a crock.