Please don't screw this movie up.
Just would thought Clint Eastwood's kid would been the right fit for Roland.
I think IT was the best one, tbhHow many of King's books really were done all that well for TV / Movies?
Fewer successes than disappointments I think - right?
I used to be a huge fan but then stopped reading him for almost 20 years
I DID get back to read the sequel to the Shining though ("Dr Sleep") -- couldn't pass that up
ref: Gunslinger -- I read up to Wizard and Glass --- liked it a lot, thought it was his most unique work (the series) but then never finished the series and lost interest in King
Casting is horrible - maybe Jake is okay, but Roland and The Dark Man were definitely miscast.I've never heard of the books but the the trailer looked terrible.
I'm going to attempt to watch it, when it comes out on Netflix anyway - but won't pay extra to go see it.IMO, King is making a mistake with this... Title is too close to some superhero Batman ******** flick and will turn a lot of movie goers (those with some level of standards) off before ever truly knowing what it is.
Besides, the trailer did it exactly zero favors. Would not rent.
I agree, kinda touching on Wyvern's point of do ALL of King's books need an accompanying movie, especially since they have a track record of being halfassed. My point was more along the lines of while he had the story, name and title first, the recent glut of poorly made and oversold superhero movies created an environment where a similary titled movie, albeit from a completely different genre, has a stigma attached to it, due directly to its title, right out of the box. You and other discerning fans will recognize what it is, but the casual watcher, who was done with the superhero pandemic 10 years ago, will glance over this title and not think twice about why they aren't going to see this movie.I'm going to attempt to watch it, when it comes out on Netflix anyway - but won't pay extra to go see it.
The Title is correct, as it's the name of the first book; these were written well before most of the big superhero movies came out (1982). The first big budget Batman movie, with Michael Keaton, didn't come out until 1989.
I really think his audience will be the fans of the series - and I'm afraid we'll be disappointed.
one of my favorite book series ever
I'm concerned
not liking the casting - and it looks like they've screwed up the sequence of events
How many of King's books really were done all that well for TV / Movies?
Fewer successes than disappointments I think - right?
I used to be a huge fan but then stopped reading him for almost 20 years
I DID get back to read the sequel to the Shining though ("Dr Sleep") -- couldn't pass that up
ref: Gunslinger -- I read up to Wizard and Glass --- liked it a lot, thought it was his most unique work (the series) but then never finished the series and lost interest in King
Loved The Talisman and it's sequel, Black HouseHe's probably my favorite author. My favorite book is his, The Talisman. I know that is an odd one to claim as his best with all his big titles out there but for me it is the best.
Can I ask why you lost interest in him? Did you find other authors you just enjoyed more? Like whom if that's the case? Always up for hearing about authors I might enjoy as well. Thanks in advance
While I've always liked King's work (especially as a kid), I can tell you why I've never loved it and why it has no longevity for me. He's too wordy. Mind-numbingly wordy. And this is coming from a very loquacious person. But, most folks don't need 6 pages describing the color gray. Descriptive writing runs and cowers from Stephen King's liberal abuse of the term. Even as a kid I had the sentiment that the guy needed to just GTF over himself already.He's probably my favorite author. My favorite book is his, The Talisman. I know that is an odd one to claim as his best with all his big titles out there but for me it is the best.
Can I ask why you lost interest in him? Did you find other authors you just enjoyed more? Like whom if that's the case? Always up for hearing about authors I might enjoy as well. Thanks in advance
He's probably my favorite author. My favorite book is his, The Talisman. I know that is an odd one to claim as his best with all his big titles out there but for me it is the best.
Can I ask why you lost interest in him? Did you find other authors you just enjoyed more? Like whom if that's the case? Always up for hearing about authors I might enjoy as well. Thanks in advance
He's probably my favorite author. My favorite book is his, The Talisman. I know that is an odd one to claim as his best with all his big titles out there but for me it is the best.
Can I ask why you lost interest in him? Did you find other authors you just enjoyed more? Like whom if that's the case? Always up for hearing about authors I might enjoy as well. Thanks in advance
Loved The Talisman and it's sequel, Black House
I can see why it's your favorite
The Stand is mine
While I've always liked King's work (especially as a kid), I can tell you why I've never loved it and why it has no longevity for me. He's too wordy. Mind-numbingly wordy. And this is coming from a very loquacious person. But, most folks don't need 6 pages describing the color gray. Descriptive writing runs and cowers from Stephen King's liberal abuse of the term. Even as a kid I had the sentiment that the guy needed to just GTF over himself already.
Edit: And this is probably why his stories rarely translate well to film.
I cannot argue that at all. I've actually said that about other authors to friends and they reply back, " But you love Stephen King."
Have you ever read Shantaram? Tremendous book written by Gregory David Roberts. I actually read it because Phil Jackson gave it to Kobe and MJ to read during playoff runs. I figured it was good enough for those guys it was good enough for me. I was blown away. Instantly went into my top five. Well the follow up to Shantaram came out in 2015, The Mountain Shadow. It is the most wordy book I have ever read. Its chapter's worth of describing the wind. I don't know if the guy caught lightning in a bottle with Shantaram and was just trying his best to have the same success but it was not very good because of how wordy it is.
Most of Kings books are related in some way. Be it a mention of a town name, a character or one of his villains. Some have a stronger connection than others
I wouldn't say it was mind-blowing, but it did kinda tick me off a bitIs this the series that the end literally made people psychotic? It was so mind-blowing or something that I guess some had to be admitted.
A lot of the story is psychological. It's hard to translate those thought sequences into a movie.Kings books rarely translate well to movies. Not sure why.
that's a very good pointA lot of the story is psychological. It's hard to translate those thought sequences into a movie.
I wouldn't say it was mind-blowing, but it did kinda tick me off a bit
that's a very good point
still though, should've started with better casting. I love Idris Elba in a lot of movies, he's a great actor - this one though...
yes he is, and he's one of my favorites. Heck, he even made Pacific Rim watchableIdris Elba is pretty damn fantastic. I think he's one of best "new" actors out there (comparatively speaking to guys like Di Nero and Hanks). If this movie tanks, I don't think it will be on his shoulders. He's been excellent in everything I've seen him in. He was one of the only brightspots in Prometheus and his character Stringer Bell on The Wire is one of the best in recent television.
Christine is great.