The destabilization of America

CAJUNEER_rivals

New member
May 29, 2001
72,872
44
0
How could you convince the most powerful nation in the history of the world it's in its best interest to join a borderless world with Nordic-like ethics? You make it weak. Do you think the left cares about transgendered? It's not about transgendered or black lives matter or climate change. It's about destabilization and reducing America's ability to dictate terms to the world. It's about world centralization so a single controlling group can end wars, end poverty, end disease.
 

DvlDog4WVU

Well-known member
Feb 2, 2008
46,617
1,511
113
How could you convince the most powerful nation in the history of the world it's in its best interest to join a borderless world with Nordic-like ethics? You make it weak. Do you think the left cares about transgendered? It's not about transgendered or black lives matter or climate change. It's about destabilization and reducing America's ability to dictate terms to the world. It's about world centralization so a single controlling group can end wars, end poverty, end disease.
New World Order?
 

dave

Well-known member
May 29, 2001
275,703
733
113
Yes. That's why one would want to fundamentally change America.
This has been his plan all along. One faux crisis to the next. He and his organizers create a crisis and act as if anyone who isnt in lock step with his version of reality is crazy. I am not sure why people fear him because none of his threats have teeth.
 

mule_eer

Member
May 6, 2002
20,438
58
48
How could you convince the most powerful nation in the history of the world it's in its best interest to join a borderless world with Nordic-like ethics? You make it weak. Do you think the left cares about transgendered? It's not about transgendered or black lives matter or climate change. It's about destabilization and reducing America's ability to dictate terms to the world. It's about world centralization so a single controlling group can end wars, end poverty, end disease.
With respect to the transgendered issue, I suspect that men who look like women at first blush have been using the ladies room for a long time, and vice versa. I don't think we need specific laws either direction. People who are looking to assault people in public places won't be deterred by them anyway, and let's not act like men don't assault boys and women don't assault girls.

With respect to BLM, I think the root cause has value. Same as the Sierra Club or NRA, I think they take things a little too far. Not every unarmed black person who gets shot by a cop didn't pose a threat to the police or the public. To say that some people were shot without good justification, then the police protected their own from prosecution is absolutely true too. We are over 50 years removed from the civil rights legislation. This should not be happening in as unbalanced a way as it has been happening.

I don't think the US has reduced its ability to dictate terms to the world. Honestly, I think that is largely due to the US being the world's police.
 

CAJUNEER_rivals

New member
May 29, 2001
72,872
44
0
With respect to the transgendered issue, I suspect that men who look like women at first blush have been using the ladies room for a long time, and vice versa. I don't think we need specific laws either direction. People who are looking to assault people in public places won't be deterred by them anyway, and let's not act like men don't assault boys and women don't assault girls.

With respect to BLM, I think the root cause has value. Same as the Sierra Club or NRA, I think they take things a little too far. Not every unarmed black person who gets shot by a cop didn't pose a threat to the police or the public. To say that some people were shot without good justification, then the police protected their own from prosecution is absolutely true too. We are over 50 years removed from the civil rights legislation. This should not be happening in as unbalanced a way as it has been happening.

I don't think the US has reduced its ability to dictate terms to the world. Honestly, I think that is largely due to the US being the world's police.
Right now we still have the most power military...but not for long if things continue to trend as they are. Right now we control the world's finances...but not for long if things continue to trend as they are.
 

Airport

Well-known member
Dec 12, 2001
80,913
1,033
113
How could you convince the most powerful nation in the history of the world it's in its best interest to join a borderless world with Nordic-like ethics? You make it weak. Do you think the left cares about transgendered? It's not about transgendered or black lives matter or climate change. It's about destabilization and reducing America's ability to dictate terms to the world. It's about world centralization so a single controlling group can end wars, end poverty, end disease.
Yu got everything right but ending wars,poverty or disease. They are after one world order.
 

CAJUNEER_rivals

New member
May 29, 2001
72,872
44
0
Yu got everything right but ending wars,poverty or disease. They are after one world order.
I don't think the movers and shakers are devoid of any sense of altruism. I think they think they can manage a world society better than people can manager their own lives.
 

Airport

Well-known member
Dec 12, 2001
80,913
1,033
113
I don't think the movers and shakers are devoid of any sense of altruism. I think they think they can manage a world society better than people can manager their own lives.

As we have seen, govt can rarely do anything that it sets out to do.