The earth is a flat, non spinning realm, not a planet in an infinite universe

Is the Earth Flat or a Globe


  • Total voters
    0
Status
Not open for further replies.

funKYcat75

Well-known member
Apr 10, 2008
32,258
14,822
112
until you prove the curve exists or that the earth is actually spinning. I have experimental data on my side, you have the word of dead and brainwashed scientists.
*You're

You don't have any experimental data at all. You have YouTube videos that for some reason we are supposed to take at face value despite the fact that it flies in the face of hundreds of years of actual scientists who are not trying to disprove anything, rather move society forward with their findings. Find me one (1) flat earth article from a respected scientific journal that even places the slightest doubt as to the spherical nature of the earth.

Also, it's strange that you've gone from "gee guys, I dunno but these videos are pretty interesting" in your first post to the point where you are claiming a worldwide conspiracy orchestrated by satan himself. Seems like you might be the brainwashed one.
 
Last edited:

Dig Dirkler

New member
Nov 20, 2015
2,963
825
0
Whether it was created by a deity or snapped into existence naturally on it's own, we can all agree there is a "thing" called the Earth that exists in some three (at least) dimensional "realm." We can surely also agree that the Earth -- as well as other "things" within this realm -- obeys certain physical laws/concepts which can be described mathematically. Just as 2+2 equals 4, one of these concepts is that, for a given volume, a sphere has the least surface area for any three-dimensional object (e.g. cube, cone, pyramid, PANCAKE, etc...).

Why does this matter? Because the only way for the Earth to be "flat" like a pancake (as you're implying) as opposed to "round" like a basketball, would have been for some deity to have suspended the physical laws that govern every other celestial body and made it flat. In other words, celestial bodies (and even earthly ones, like raindrops for instance) that develop "naturally" are spheroid because that's the shape which has the smallest surface area for their given volume.
 
Feb 24, 2009
3,807
555
0
Whether it was created by a deity or snapped into existence naturally on it's own, we can all agree there is a "thing" called the Earth that exists in some three (at least) dimensional "realm." We can surely also agree that the Earth -- as well as other "things" within this realm -- obeys certain physical laws/concepts which can be described mathematically. Just as 2+2 equals 4, one of these concepts is that, for a given volume, a sphere has the least surface area for any three-dimensional object (e.g. cube, cone, pyramid, PANCAKE, etc...).

Why does this matter? Because the only way for the Earth to be "flat" like a pancake (as you're implying) as opposed to "round" like a basketball, would have been for some deity to have suspended the physical laws that govern every other celestial body and made it flat. In other words, celestial bodies (and even earthly ones, like raindrops for instance) that develop "naturally" are spheroid because that's the shape which has the smallest surface area for their given volume.
You just proved the existence of God.

Because there is a flat earth------>God.

You hear that, Bill. We've done it!!! We didn't even have to buy fancy cameras/lasers/balloons.
 

GonzoCat90

New member
Mar 30, 2009
32,377
3,860
0
Kinda tough to prove something to you with empirical evidence when you think all empirical evidence is fake except for the kind on youtube discovered by guys with awful beards.
 

herodotus6

New member
Sep 11, 2008
12,411
8,925
0
Time to branch out. If out space existed it would be under a vacuum correct? You know what doesn't work in a vacuum, propulsion. If space existed no known method of propulsion works there.
Where TF have you heard that? This one is so damned easy to disprove. I've done it myself. Build a box out of plexi, connect a vacuum through a hole in the box, place a bottle rocket on a matchbox car and an electric starter to ignite the fuse, turn on the vacuum and ignite once you have a pure vacuum in the space. Matter of fact, I'll save you time, Mythbusters did it.

 

ky8335

New member
Oct 29, 2005
1,287
106
0
 

herodotus6

New member
Sep 11, 2008
12,411
8,925
0
Let me guess, Bushy Beaver, you're letting this video form your opinion.



Yes, technically a fan can create thrust, even if it is minute, especially a fan that small. However, air is the fuel to create that thrust. What does a vacuum not have to create said vacuum? AIR, DIPSTICK! Basically you have fan blades just spinning in an airless chamber, this proves nothing, except that when idiots who don't know jack about science try to science, they just look like idiots.
 

cricket3

Well-known member
May 29, 2001
18,971
1,859
113
So you're telling me space ships aren't just using a bunch of Big *** Fans to move around in space?
 
Mar 25, 2004
357,002
12,009
0
if the earth is round how come my beer don't slide off the tv tray spilling all the precious beer all over the carpet huh? sounds flat to me lol go f*** yourself "science" imo
 

Bushy Bill

New member
Mar 14, 2017
280
0
0
That is only half of the video, in the other half he tries to light solid fuel with an oxidizer in the vacuum, no dice.

 

Bushy Bill

New member
Mar 14, 2017
280
0
0
There's something very unsettling to me about being able to see the curvature of the earth. Maybe I just haven't slept enough lately.

Gravity man. Crazy ****.

Except, you've never seen the curvature or experienced gravity.

mindblown.gif
 

Bushy Bill

New member
Mar 14, 2017
280
0
0
Is there a flaw in his calculations or reasoning?





If you find one mark the time and which video so we can discuss it.
 

herodotus6

New member
Sep 11, 2008
12,411
8,925
0
That is only half of the video, in the other half he tries to light solid fuel with an oxidizer in the vacuum, no dice.


Because there is no oxygen in a vacuum, dipish! You do know that is what a vacuum is, right? Of course he can't like an oxidizer in an environment where none exists, you have to ignite internally so the fuel will burn, or in Earth's atmosphere where the reaction will continue in space. That's why you have to use an electric arc in the vacuum experiment I mentioned earlier, a flame can't exist in a vacuum.
 

Bill Cosby

New member
May 1, 2008
29,258
4,225
0
So does Kyrie Irving actually believe all this Youtube ****? I saw the headlines where he said something about a flat earth, and just dismissed it as him being an ignorant moron.

It's about 100 times worse if someone educated themself with Youtube videos, and isn't just an ignorant athlete who knew he'd always get by on his athletic abilities.
 

WildcatFan1982

Active member
Dec 4, 2011
21,116
422
51
So does Kyrie Irving actually believe all this Youtube ****? I saw the headlines where he said something about a flat earth, and just dismissed it as him being an ignorant moron.

It's about 100 times worse if someone educated themself with Youtube videos, and isn't just an ignorant athlete who knew he'd always get by on his athletic abilities.

He has said in follow ups that he does.
 

Bushy Bill

New member
Mar 14, 2017
280
0
0
So does Kyrie Irving actually believe all this Youtube ****? I saw the headlines where he said something about a flat earth, and just dismissed it as him being an ignorant moron.

It's about 100 times worse if someone educated themself with Youtube videos, and isn't just an ignorant athlete who knew he'd always get by on his athletic abilities.

And yet you've NEVER witnessed the curve for yourself, EVER.
 

Anon1711055878

Active member
Jul 20, 2007
5,674
501
60
Bushy Bill's jersey is in the rafters as greatest Paddock troll of all time. No flat-earther has ever been able to write as well and incite like this guy. I'm glad you guys kept it going for 7 pages, but I'm also a little disappointed. C'mon Paddock...
 

Bushy Bill

New member
Mar 14, 2017
280
0
0
I always find it amusing when people think I'm trolling. It's the cognitive dissonance taking hold.
 

Tinker Dan

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2006
3,540
540
113
So please tell me why the VHF radio band is extremely limited in ship to ship communications but does not face the same limitation when communicating with an airplane or a satellite.

Also, why then can the HF frequency band go for thousands upon thousands of miles given the right conditions and VHF cannot?

It is okay, you can go back to the formulas I linked earlier if you need help.
 

RacerX.ksr

New member
Sep 17, 2004
132,592
26,415
0
Is there a flaw in his calculations or reasoning?





If you find one mark the time and which video so we can discuss it.

There is a flaw at around 3:15 in the second video when he is about to suck the air out of a bottle. He mistakenly states that you are pulling on the inside wall. That is not true and proves he has no idea what he is talking about. That's the only one I've clicked on so far and probably the only one I will. Did you know there are videos on YouTube of a chick with big tits who plays a guitar?
 

UK_Dallas

Active member
Sep 17, 2015
14,261
3,835
76
OP - the only thing I can prove to you is that you don't have to be a real estate agent to sell a house:

 

Bushy Bill

New member
Mar 14, 2017
280
0
0
There is a flaw at around 3:15 in the second video when he is about to suck the air out of a bottle. He mistakenly states that you are pulling on the inside wall. That is not true and proves he has no idea what he is talking about. That's the only one I've clicked on so far and probably the only one I will. Did you know there are videos on YouTube of a chick with big tits who plays a guitar?

LOL wut
 

RacerX.ksr

New member
Sep 17, 2004
132,592
26,415
0
I thought you said we were going to discuss it? I have no need to watch any more of that kook than I did earlier.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.