Funny story about how they'll stop at nothing to make sure she wins.
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201...olluding-ap-announce-delegate-win-california/
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201...olluding-ap-announce-delegate-win-california/
The fix was in long ago...
- Thread starter Mntneer
- Start date
Sadly I am now believing that the media controls who gets elected more than any time in history.
Yet there will be some fvcktards on here claiming she is the best thing sliced bread while saying the only reason people don't like her is because you don't like Bill.
The superdelegate concept is not a fair one, for sure. And needs to be stopped. But the caucus deal is just as bad. What a farce.
This fuktard does not think "she is the best thing sliced bread ". I think she is the best candidate running. Period.
I disagree on the superdelegate issue. The presidential primary is not meant to be fully democratic in the selection. The parties are private organizations. If you want a pure democratic process for the presidency, then there wouldn't be a primary. You go to the General election with all candidates and the popular vote wins. That would be worst. The system in place with the parties and the electoral college in the general protects the country a little from a real bad person getting the top job. Lot of literature on this to study if one wishes.
It's the shear number of super delegates that I think is a tad absurd.
But, as you said, they're a private organization and they have the right to select their nominee however they see fit.