The hatefest in both directions is just part of the show.
http://www.economist.com/news/busin...aditional-media-firms-are-enjoying-trump-bump
http://www.economist.com/news/busin...aditional-media-firms-are-enjoying-trump-bump
The hatefest in both directions is just part of the show.
http://www.economist.com/news/busin...aditional-media-firms-are-enjoying-trump-bump
With all due respect Op2, in my opinion I don't think that's it at all. They actually and genuinely hate him, and their constant bashing of him over every breath he draws is evident of that ongoing hatred.
So why do they and most of the Leftist ideology they promote hate Trump and his supporters with such maniacal ferocity?
Because he represents the biggest threat to dismantle the edifice they have errected, worship, and idolize. The very process and theology they have pledged their allegiance to...what their Faith and purpose is in.
Leviathan. Statism. Globalism. Secular Humanism. Atheism. Anti-Christ.
The common thread stringing Trump hatred and the Left together is hatred of all things Christian or God centered.
Anyone and everyone on the Left shares this hatred not only of Trump, but of the entire concept of our individual & Religious freedoms based on our allegiance to a Creator specified in our founding documents, not an all encompassing Government run by all powerful Men!
The media, the Left, and secular humanists hate this, Trump, America, and anything or anyone else who thinks or believes alternative to a supreme Leviathan.
They ALL must be destroyed.
Wow, you're something. So despite the fact that Trump brings in big money, they hate him? Okay.
And religion? With Trump? Seriously? I think it's even more likely that Trump is an atheist than it was that Obama was an atheist.
I think the fact that someone like Trump got such strong support from evangelicals is evidence that the Religious Right has given up on getting one of their own in and they're shifting to surrogates like Trump that the left hates instead.
Op2 you really think the Left hates Trump only because he has money?
You really think Trump's Pro Life position is inferior to Obama's and Hillary's tax payer supported Abortion on demand support when the two are compared by Evengelicals?
You really think the Right believes Trump is anti second amendment, anti Religious Freedom and anti school choice like virtually 100% of the radical Left is?
You really are delusional my friend. As I said, the more you post, the more you leave me confused over what you really believe?
hate = $.The hatefest in both directions is just part of the show.
http://www.economist.com/news/busin...aditional-media-firms-are-enjoying-trump-bump
The hatefest in both directions is just part of the show.
http://www.economist.com/news/busin...aditional-media-firms-are-enjoying-trump-bump
So despite the fact that Trump brings in big money, they hate him? Okay.
OP, let me pose a far different and Imo, more accurate storyline. The media adored Trump doing the primary season. He brought ratings and he took the best the GOP had to offer down. In doing so, he made it much easier for Hillary. He brought ratings and destroyed Hillary's likely GOP opponents (Kasich, Rubio, etc.). A huge win-win for the media.
Then the general election came around and the media coverage changed dramatically. Naturally, the liberal media wanted a Hillary victory. And Trump's coverage turned decidedly negative. He didn't do anything different, but his opponent was different,
This survey shows that 88% of Trump's media coverage is negative:
http://www.dailywire.com/news/14035/report-how-biased-media-against-trump-88-coverage-james-barrett
This exhaustive by the highly respected Tenor, is published in the Wash Post.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...e-even-on-fox-news/?dg&utm_term=.0fba41cc06f0
To claim that the media secretly loves Trump because of the ratings is simply silly. They can still cover Trump. Still highlight his statements. Still be 50-60% negative and get ratings. But 88%? And so much fake news that even highly respected John Dickerson says the media is essentially destroying itself.
That's not adoration. Trump has always been "the bad guy" but he's been on that gets great ratings.
So OK Op2, let's say you're right? Why do they want to destroy him now if he's bringing them such great ratings? You'd think they'd want to keep his carnival show up and running to buck up their audience cums?
Instead they hate his guts, ratings be damned. They're turning off half of their audience with their incessant Trump bashing, but that sure as Hell doesn't stop them.
Why?
Because of what I've already told you about why they hate him so much.
Either address what I write or else I'm just not going to bother engaging anymore.
The media adored Trump during primary season? The media has never adored Trump, period, even before he ran for POTUS. His MO has always been to play the over the top rich guy and the media has always played that angle because that gets eyeballs but the media has never fawned over Trump and I doubt Trump would ever want them to because Trump prefers to conquer.
The whole time Trump was running for the GOP nomination the general gestalt was "Look at this crazy guy running, no way he can win, but the whole thing is so crazy that everybody wants to watch so great, let's keep putting him on TV because it's good for ratings." That's not adoration. Trump has always been "the bad guy" but he's been one that gets great ratings.
Did you read the first post in this thread? Ratings are way up. Trying to destroy someone, whether you're really trying to destroy them or just pretending, gets great ratings.
You were not paying one bit of attention to the primary. Zucker said Trump was great for ratings. He put him on every chance he got. He called into every news show around and they put him on. He sucked the air out of the media coverage for the GOP during the primary.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/life...35afb41797f_story.html?utm_term=.f68555ab335d
And you're giving the media far too little credit. They knew exactly what they were doing with Trump during the primary. He was great for ratings and he destroyed his fellow GOPers. A win-win.
Why all the negative coverage now? How do you reconcile their loving him during the general and now hating him?
Did you read the first post in this thread? Ratings are way up. Trying to destroy someone, whether you're really trying to destroy them or just pretending, gets great ratings.
My God, OP, it's ideology. 91% negative? That's just not possible with a balanced media. Conservatives give him about an 85 - 90% positive rating. How could the media essentially give him just the opposite? Can they not report on the positive things he has done that Republicans and Independents agree with? Yes, they could, but they won't. Corruption.
THEY DON'T HATE HIM NOW, HE GETS GREAT RATINGS!!!!!! I don't understand why people don't see something so simple as this.
Have you guys ever seen professional wresting? That's what this is. Sometimes someone is a "bad guy" but that doesn't mean he's inherently bad or that the pro wresting federation is against him. It's a role. Trump likes it and the media like it because it benefits them both, as the fact that it got Trump elected POTUS and the fact that the media ratings are high attest.
Op2, you said the media hates Trump, because he brings them ratings. They are trying to keep their ratings up by bashing him. That's your argument right?
There is no other reason they hate him so much...other than to keep their ratings high right?
So explain why they still oppose him on issues that don't bring them ratings? Like limiting the size of Government. Regulatory reforms. Immigration reforms. Abortion. School choice.
No one is clamoring for more media stories on these issues, yet the Media virtually is 100 opposed to Trump on every one of them. So explain to me how protecting their ratings by opposing Trump on these issues is even smart business, let alone wrong?
91% negative? OMG. Have you seen his press conferences? The hate is palpable.
Let me give you a lesson OP. The media's job is to report facts, right? Why are they shunning that responsibility and their journalistic ethics? For financial gain for their companies? Would you violate your professional ethics so that your company can make a little more money? Would you sacrifice your credibility for your company? Or would you take a principled stance and decline for the sake of your professionalism?
You're essentially saying the MSM are all whores worshipping at the altar of ratings. I think the media can get ratings and still cover Trump in a fair and balanced fashion.
How do you know that any media oppose anyone on anything? They're media, their job is to get you to watch.
THEY DON'T HATE HIM NOW, HE GETS GREAT RATINGS!!!!!! I don't understand why people don't see something so simple as this.
No, the hard news media's job first and foremost is to report facts. Not opinion, facts. Analysts report opinion. Ratings are of course necessary but not if you have to sacrifice your professional integrity and possibly career.
How do you know that any media oppose anyone on anything? They're media, their job is to get you to watch.
THEY DON'T HATE HIM NOW, HE GETS GREAT RATINGS!!!!!! I don't understand why people don't see something so simple as this.
Have you guys ever seen professional wresting? That's what this is. Sometimes someone is a "bad guy" but that doesn't mean he's inherently bad or that the pro wresting federation is against him. It's a role. Trump likes it and the media like it because it benefits them both, as the fact that it got Trump elected POTUS and the fact that the media ratings are high attest.
If you start a media entity you do whatever you want. I can't dictate to you what you should do.
OP, professional wrestling is a HOAX. Are you saying the hard news media is a HOAX? Only interested in ratings. Lie, distort, slant, ignore all for ratings? If you're right, the media is much more corrupt than I thought.
BTW, the media's non stop negative coverage of Trump is not good for Trump. Have you seen his ratings?
OP, the media and the journalism schools they attend have standards, professional standards. They hold themselves up as ethical, neutral reporters. You're saying they are shunning those professional ethics for dollars. WOW.
OP, professional wrestling is a HOAX. Are you saying the hard news media is a HOAX? Only interested in ratings. Lie, distort, slant, ignore all for ratings? If you're right, the media is much more corrupt than I thought.
BTW, the media's non stop negative coverage of Trump is not good for Trump. Have you seen his ratings?
So because I equate playing up a "bad guy" to increase ratings like they do in wrestling I'm suddenly implying that everything is a hoax? Oh, okay.
If not for the medias non-stop coverage of Trump HE WOULD NOT BE PRESIDENT so yes, on the whole it's good for him. That doesn't mean every single thing the media does is good for Trump. The media looks after themselves somewhat too ya know. Geez, you guys are a chore.
So because I equate playing up a "bad guy" to increase ratings like they do in wrestling I'm suddenly implying that everything is a hoax?
OP, professional wrestling is a HOAX. Are you saying the hard news media is a HOAX?
Op2, if the Media was more concerned about it's ratings under Obama using your theory can you cite some examples for me where they opposed him (or made him out to be the "bad guy" under your scenario) to keep their ratings up?
When was their coverage of Obama nearly 100% negative or at least as universally negative (91%) against him like it is against Trump now?
Honest to goodness, this is such a waste of time. Why do you guys spend so much time on this nonsense? Pointless
Because your argument doesn't make any sense Op2. You said the last 1.5 years the Media was "all over" Obama as a good guy foil just to prop up their ratings?
So then why did they pimp Trump as PAX suggested during the Republican primaries? Wouldn't they have been "all over" Hillary to keep their ratings up by her being in effect an extension of Obama's 3rd term?
Hilary is boring. Obama and Trump are not. If Hilary wasn't boring she'd be POTUS today. It's too bad people judge based on that stuff, but they do.
Well then I'd be very distrustful of virtually anything or anyone they report on who is "boring".
So tell me Op2, since you think the Media does not find Trump "boring", do you think they still fairly and accurately report on him?
Did they fairly and accurately report on Obama who also was not "boring"?
Do they tell the Truth, or is everything they report on based on lies and "ratings"?
I do agree with OP about one thing. He claims the media is ALL ABOUT RATINGS. This means the media cannot be trusted to report facts but rather report things that get ratings, even if those things are outright lies. He has proved my point that I have been making for months. The main stream media is corrupt. OP and I simply have different theories as to why they are corrupt.
THEY DON'T HATE HIM NOW, HE GETS GREAT RATINGS!!!!!! I don't understand why people don't see something so simple as this.
Have you guys ever seen professional wresting? That's what this is. Sometimes someone is a "bad guy" but that doesn't mean he's inherently bad or that the pro wresting federation is against him. It's a role. Trump likes it and the media like it because it benefits them both, as the fact that it got Trump elected POTUS and the fact that the media ratings are high attest.