Defending Christian values and the Republican way since well since never
Last edited:
The moral compass
- Thread starter sammyk
- Start date
Defending Christian values and the Republican way since well since never
All that's been debunked. All you have to do is stop pretending you haven't read that on the board already. The new Republican's moral compass is pointed at stepping on you Anti-American Commies throat. **** your feelings are where the majority of us are.
He is in a being questioned about the rape today, so not debunked sorry. keep on hating when donny is found guilty your tears will be tasty. And the sooner we get the ignorant people like you educated the better.
You're not educating anyone moron. Everyone has seen this game before. Nobody is going to fall for it. You also need to stop trying to go all Saul Alinsky on the Christians or don't coming crying to me when they get fed up with it and go all Old Testament on your ***.
Yawn. God was an alien and the Old Testament was a nice collection of stories. And the last thing we need is more religion and hand waiving fools like you
Pull your head out off your *** and take a look at the world going on around you. Your leader is making things worse by the day. I don't see you surviving very long in what could come next at the rate your party is going.
you can't even defend liberal values, like aborting black babies.
your moral compass is one man's penis in the anus of another man. true north I guess.
Interesting. The professed Christian is the one who used epithets and profanity in his posts.
True to the spirit of modern Christianity.
Oh well, one of these days you’ll be Satan’s problem, not our’s.
True to the spirit of modern Christianity.
Oh well, one of these days you’ll be Satan’s problem, not our’s.
What are Christian values? Can you name them? How did you learn them? What are they based on?
I'm listening.
You realize the Old Testament is simply a collection of prophesies that explain in detail the coming of Christ, his crucifixion and ultimate ressurrection?
You may or may not realize it is 100% accurate both in its historical revelations and predictive prophesies?
Calling it simply a "collection of stories" is like calling the Constitution a "collection of ideas". Its (Bible's) power is in the Truth of its authenticity across the human experience. Similar to the Constitution's proven stability across the life of America.
Is it any wonder why Leftists such as yourself summarily dismiss and/or reject both?
Not to me! So exactly what are "Christian values" you spoke of? How would you know them if you saw them? If you cannot answer that, what exactly are you complaining about when it comes to how Christians view Trump?
Explain please?
Last edited:
Same question to you. What is a "professed Christian?" What do they say which lets you know they are what you are calling them? What about them says to you they can not use profanity?
Can you elaborate?
Christ is the recognized figure Christians declare their allegiance to. What "Religion" was he?
I've asked you in this thread to explain this. It's not a "gotcha" question, I'm genuinely curious to understand what you're upset about or complaining about? What is it Christians in your mind aren't doing that's the source of your complaint here (if there is one) or just what are you saying about Christians?
If you can't explain it, then why are you posting? What is the point you're trying to make?
@sammyk it's irrelevant if you answer me...I suspect I know why you won't or can't. However I want to state for the record your assertion about the Bible is 100% false. I'm posting the following for you to read and educate yourself should you choose, but also for others who may not be aware of the Bible's accuracy and reliability.
As I mentioned earlier, the Old Testament is simply predictive prophecy of the coming of Christ. The Bible's entire veracity rests on Christ...his arrival, his Life, and his death. All were foretold in the Old Testament, and history confirms his existence. Amazingly, his death and resurrection (also 100% reliable) proves the Bible's story conclusively! It's simple...if there is no Christ, there is no resurrection. If there was no resurrection, the Bible is false. Both are 100% true however, and this link explains why quite thoroughly.
excerpt:
Of course, the central issue of Biblical reliability is whether Jesus Christ is the supernatural, risen Son of God, as the Gospels and the rest of the New Testament proclaim. If he is, then Christianity is true and the Bible’s most important and astounding claim is true. On the other hand, if Jesus did not rise from the dead, or if we simply have no reason to think that he did, then a giant question mark hangs over the Bible and the Christian faith. That Jesus was crucified is historically as certain as anything can be from that era. That Jesus’ followers were convinced a few days later that he had risen from the grave is a hard fact acknowledged by the vast majority of scholars. A year or so later, a Pharisee named Saul (Paul) who opposed the Christian movement himself testified that Jesus had appeared to him and appointed him to preach the Christian message to Gentiles—people that Paul had regarded as unclean. The best explanation for these facts is that Jesus did indeed rise from the dead.12
Read...learn.
As I mentioned earlier, the Old Testament is simply predictive prophecy of the coming of Christ. The Bible's entire veracity rests on Christ...his arrival, his Life, and his death. All were foretold in the Old Testament, and history confirms his existence. Amazingly, his death and resurrection (also 100% reliable) proves the Bible's story conclusively! It's simple...if there is no Christ, there is no resurrection. If there was no resurrection, the Bible is false. Both are 100% true however, and this link explains why quite thoroughly.
excerpt:
Of course, the central issue of Biblical reliability is whether Jesus Christ is the supernatural, risen Son of God, as the Gospels and the rest of the New Testament proclaim. If he is, then Christianity is true and the Bible’s most important and astounding claim is true. On the other hand, if Jesus did not rise from the dead, or if we simply have no reason to think that he did, then a giant question mark hangs over the Bible and the Christian faith. That Jesus was crucified is historically as certain as anything can be from that era. That Jesus’ followers were convinced a few days later that he had risen from the grave is a hard fact acknowledged by the vast majority of scholars. A year or so later, a Pharisee named Saul (Paul) who opposed the Christian movement himself testified that Jesus had appeared to him and appointed him to preach the Christian message to Gentiles—people that Paul had regarded as unclean. The best explanation for these facts is that Jesus did indeed rise from the dead.12
Read...learn.
Last edited:
@sammyk just FYI
Now you can dismiss what I'm offering here as direct rebuttal to your charge of the Bible being just a "collection of stories". However doing so, you simply make yourself out to be not only uninformed about the Bible's vast array of documented historical and scientifically verified proof, but also lacking any serious credibility suggesting any inauthenticity on the part of Christians who both read the Bible and believe in its supernatural inerrancy of Christ whom it reveals as Lord and Savior.
Now you can dismiss what I'm offering here as direct rebuttal to your charge of the Bible being just a "collection of stories". However doing so, you simply make yourself out to be not only uninformed about the Bible's vast array of documented historical and scientifically verified proof, but also lacking any serious credibility suggesting any inauthenticity on the part of Christians who both read the Bible and believe in its supernatural inerrancy of Christ whom it reveals as Lord and Savior.
I'm just personally disappointed (though not surprised) @sammyk and @Soaring Eagle 74 cannot either explain their posts in this thread nor answer my very reasonable questions to each asking them to do so. It's disappointing because I sincerely wanted to engage them about their misperceptions of Christians. I couldn't do that however without understanding what those perceptions are?
It's not surprising because bigots and non believers typically don't understand anything about Christianity primarily because they do not believe in the claims of its central figure...Jesus Christ. Amazingly, the Bible (which they also reject) promises every ear shall hear, and every person will have a chance to either accept or reject Christ. Surely they've heard his claims, and obviously reject them. However they then go one step further, and cast aspersions on those who have heard Christ's message and accept his claims! So it's not surprising they cannot explain or defend what bothers them about believers who simply have chosen to accept Christ's claims?
Ironically, Christ himself said he was first hated, and anyone who subsequently accepts & Loves him will also be similarly hated.
John 15:18-27
“If the world hates you, remember that it hated me first. The world would love you as one of its own if you belonged to it, but you are no longer part of the world. I chose you to come out of the world, so it hates you. Do you remember what I told you? ‘A slave is not greater than the master.’ Since they persecuted me, naturally they will persecute you. And if they had listened to me, they would listen to you. They will do all this to you because of me, for they have rejected the one who sent me.
Says it all in that passage.
It's not surprising because bigots and non believers typically don't understand anything about Christianity primarily because they do not believe in the claims of its central figure...Jesus Christ. Amazingly, the Bible (which they also reject) promises every ear shall hear, and every person will have a chance to either accept or reject Christ. Surely they've heard his claims, and obviously reject them. However they then go one step further, and cast aspersions on those who have heard Christ's message and accept his claims! So it's not surprising they cannot explain or defend what bothers them about believers who simply have chosen to accept Christ's claims?
Ironically, Christ himself said he was first hated, and anyone who subsequently accepts & Loves him will also be similarly hated.
John 15:18-27
“If the world hates you, remember that it hated me first. The world would love you as one of its own if you belonged to it, but you are no longer part of the world. I chose you to come out of the world, so it hates you. Do you remember what I told you? ‘A slave is not greater than the master.’ Since they persecuted me, naturally they will persecute you. And if they had listened to me, they would listen to you. They will do all this to you because of me, for they have rejected the one who sent me.
Says it all in that passage.
Last edited:
So you opened this thread suggesting the articles you linked us to were indicative of "Christian values". Yet when asked to explain what possible relation there was/is between what you linked to and what you suggested, particularly when it comes to Republicans, you have been either unwilling or unable to do so?
So what was the point of this post? Do you think you really were making a point? If you can't explain the point you thought you were making, why did you even bother posting this? Taking the time you did to first think about what you wanted to say, sift through dozens of pages of online material to select and post what you think backs up what you wanted to say, then remaining 100% silent when asked to simply explain what you obviously intended for others to understand what you were saying tells me one thing:
Well apparently neither does @sammyk DJT, so don't worry about it.
Last edited:
Because they cannot defeat him. or his MAGA ideas. So all they have left to try and stop him is to smear him. They're not even any good at that.
@sammyk wants everyone to read his drivel but he can't defend a word written in any of it. go ahead, ask him a question if you're stupid enough to click on one of his aimless posts. 100% guarantee he'll go stone cold silent.
@sammyk wants everyone to read his drivel but he can't defend a word written in any of it. go ahead, ask him a question if you're stupid enough to click on one of his aimless posts. 100% guarantee he'll go stone cold silent.
He's repeating the same 3 or 4 articles everytime, right? I gave up trying to understand him a week ago.
I tried to engage him on his postings against Christians. Didn't even have the courage of his own convictions.
Yet again you're still worried about a man who has not been president for 2 years. Biden is the president and he blows at it.
Well having someone who is king maker and getting that ideology in place is a danger and is a problem. For a lack of a better example just look at Germany 1930's . Thing is there is not much of me defending Biden on here. Has he at least tried to govern ? Sure. Can things get better ? Sure. I am worried that a want to be dictator will run for President again and that is worrisome. Because our democracy is not just these 4 years
Ok how is he a puppet master???? You guys accuse him of being senile and feeble. How can he be the conductor of all of this???? Trump did a lot of things that Hitler did again read the post Dic move and it's there