There was also the Rockies fan who was accused of screaming the N word at an opposing player. They tried to get him fired from his job and shamed him on his social media. The Rockies even initially banned him from ever attending another game. Turns out, the Rockies' mascot is named Dinger and the man was trying to get his attention so his grandson could get a photo with him. He wasn't even facing the batter when he was screaming Dinger, but they went with the old white man screaming the N word angle because they're desperate to keep racism rolling.
Part of the explanation exonerating this guy is that the mascot's name sounds similar when yelled in a stadium filled with elevens of Rockies fans. That's kinda an acknowledgement that it was a reasonable mistake on the part of the original accuser(s). Did it assume the worst? Absolutely, but y'all wouldn't think twice about a home owner answering their door with a gun (nor would I), so let's not get into judging who does and doesn't have a good reason to be on guard against potential threats.
So on the bold, I really don't think this is the best example of that. Notice I'm not arguing about every example. I'm referring to this one specifically. I think the process through which you've reached the conclusion in the bold is no different -- for better or worse -- than that of the person who thought this Rockies' fan was yelling something else.
Notice also I'm not asking for proof of this incident happening at all, or accusing you of making it up because you're desperate to keep "reverse racism" rolling. I'm taking you at your word, which is much more than any of y'all here
ever due when it's a BIPOC accusing a white person of racism.