Lol.Why are you buying that this was even on NBC News? Photoshop is an awesome thing and other than JD Vance saying it, I have not found any other web site that is discussing this slide.
Lol.Why are you buying that this was even on NBC News? Photoshop is an awesome thing and other than JD Vance saying it, I have not found any other web site that is discussing this slide.
You have pretty much all of that wrong. Mueller himself is a Republican but he is generally so nonpartisan that he had worked in both Dem and Rep administrations and the idea that he had a "long history of manufacturing evidence" is complete and utter ********. And he did not say that he did not know what was in the report. He said he would not repeat what was in the report, when asked questions. The report made clear that the behavior of the Trump campaign committee was simply abhorrent and demonstrated that Trump has no understanding of patriotism and is happy to act corruptly secure in the knowledge that the cowards in the Republican Party would always protect him.One the Mueller report was only staffed by Democrats who sole goal was to destroy the Trump administration.Two Mueller in his testimony before Congress constantly said he did not know what was in the report.He seemed to be more cognitively impaired than Biden.Three it was primarily led by a prosecutor who had a long history of manufacturing evidence.If he had been able to persuade people that Trump was guilty he would have.There is no way to take such a biased report seriously but they still could not make their case
That did not happen. Had it happened, you would be correct that it was against the law. she just did not do that.You're right. Destroying documents that were subpoenaed by the courts is not breaking the law. Again, it's outrage on one side, excuses for your side. Try again.
You are nothing but a partisan hack with the mind of a sheep. So forgive me for dismissing your opinion, not fact, that this didn't happen.That did not happen. Had it happened, you would be correct that it was against the law. she just did not do that.
Channeling Mac is not a good look. Choosing ignorance is even worseYou are nothing but a partisan hack with the mind of a sheep. So forgive me for dismissing your opinion, not fact, that this didn't happen.
I am talking to you person to person. I will not treat or talk to you any differently because of anything that you cannot control. Put your victim card away. Burn it actually, you've used it more times than it allows.Channeling Mac is not a good look. Choosing ignorance is even worse
That’s an interesting read and perspective. It’s well above my pay grade to have any clue on the validity of what he is saying there…having said that, I do really wonder why we have shortsighted ourselves with respect to the effectiveness of antiviral drug treatments. They’ve shown to be very effective in treating covid, especially in the early stages. I’d think, with that and developing a natural immunity would be more advantageous to a mass populous than a forced vaccination plan, and again, I’m vaccinated.
Ok. I'll bite. What law did she break?You are nothing but a partisan hack with the mind of a sheep. So forgive me for dismissing your opinion, not fact, that this didn't happen.
That’s an interesting read and perspective. It’s well above my pay grade to have any clue on the validity of what he is saying there…having said that, I do really wonder why we have shortsighted ourselves with respect to the effectiveness of antiviral drug treatments. They’ve shown to be very effective in treating covid, especially in the early stages. I’d think, with that and developing a natural immunity would be more advantageous to a mass populous than a forced vaccination plan, and again, I’m vaccinated.
Ummm... that was kind of the point, hence the dramatic exclamation points and the eyeroll. Slow clap for your being right on top of that, though..This kind of false equivalence is criminally stupid. Christ, dattier.
Ummm... that was kind of the point, hence the dramatic exclamation points and the eyeroll. Slow clap for your being right on top of that, though..
When you reject what others say out of hand, this is the kind of take you end up with.You libs are a pathetic bunch. Excuses, excuses, excuses. And nothing concrete to support the President we have now. Earlier I gave real negatives that have happened since mush brain and the cackling hen have taken over. You have not come back with anything positive that’s been done. Positive meaning better for our country.
Proving yet again all you libs are about is feelings over facts.
None. She's as clean as a toilet brush.Ok. I'll bite. What law did she break?
And like Deniro in his latter years with Dattier I no longer know what’s parody and when he’s playing it straightUmmm... that was kind of the point, hence the dramatic exclamation points and the eyeroll. Slow clap for your being right on top of that, though..
Again, the d-r-a-m-a-t-i-c... e-x-c-l-a-m-a-t-i-o-n... p-o-i-n-t-s and the e-y-e-r-o-l-l are pretty big clues.And like Deniro in his latter years with Dattier I no longer know what’s parody and when he’s playing it straight
Tell us what kind of point you were trying to make. It's difficult to decode stupid on the internet sometimes.Again, the d-r-a-m-a-t-i-c... e-x-c-l-a-m-a-t-i-o-n... p-o-i-n-t-s and the e-y-e-r-o-l-l are pretty big clues.
You tell me I am an idiot for my statement that HRC did not break any laws, I then ask you to provide facts to refute my belief and this is your response? How about giving me a straight answer!None. She's as clean as a toilet brush.
I told you that you were an idiot? There is no straight answer. Your head is in the dirt when it comes to democrats breaking laws. You know damned well that I have already named one thing she did that would land you, me and anyone named billy in jail. You won't accept it, because you excuse it. That's how partisan hacks roll.You tell me I am an idiot for my statement that HRC did not break any laws, I then ask you to provide facts to refute my belief and this is your response? How about giving me a straight answer!
It's pretty easy to call things you didn't understand stupid, though, especially when you don't hold yourself accountable for any effort to back it up.Tell us what kind of point you were trying to make. It's difficult to decode stupid on the internet sometimes.
So what was the point you failed to make with your pitiful attempt at sarcasm?It's pretty easy to call things you didn't understand stupid, though, especially when you don't hold yourself accountable for any effort to back it up.
Oh, I made it just fine. I have little faith that repeating it would make any difference with you or @topps coach . It's as if you're afraid that understanding or/and respecting a different point of view renders you incapable of continuing to disagree with it, so you're not open to hearing it and trying to get it even as you ask me to repeat it.So what was the point you failed to make with your pitiful attempt at sarcasm?
Fair enough. I mean, weird delivery, but I can agree with the overall point. I admit that when I responded to your initial post, I wasn't really paying attention to the conversation. I genuinely thought you were being serious. No offense, but it isn't outrageous to think that you were being serious. I respect the fact that you can admit to at least being on the fringe of the extreme left. So many people pretend to be moderate. I certainly am not a moderate, but I also don't waste too much time defending positions on the right because they are just as diabolical as the left.Oh, I made it just fine. I have little faith that repeating it would make any difference with you or @topps coach . It's as if you're afraid that understanding or/and respecting a different point of view renders you incapable of continuing to disagree with it, so you're not open to hearing it and trying to get it even as you ask me to repeat it.
But sure: topps made an absolutist and sweeping statement about ALL people who are here illegally. I mocked it. Generally speaking, absolutism lacks depth and awareness of complexity. (See how even there I qualified it as "generally"?)
There are absolutists on both the extreme left and extreme right, and I have problems with both, though most of my ideals align pretty closely w/ the extreme left. ("most... pretty closely..." -- more examples of avoiding absolutist language, but watch someone reply, naming a specific extreme left position in biased, slanted language, then attempting to make me own it 100% as they framed it.)
Absolutists see simple explanations and simple solutions to issues they can't or won't recognize as complex. Political discourse is dumber and more divisive because of it.
I actually don’t rememberI told you that you were an idiot? There is no straight answer. Your head is in the dirt when it comes to democrats breaking laws. You know damned well that I have already named one thing she did that would land you, me and anyone named billy in jail. You won't accept it, because you excuse it. That's how partisan hacks roll.
Do you know whether they are one use masks or cleaned or whateverGood to see the Duke coaching staff back to wearing masks at K academy. I’m making a pretty reasonable assumption that they’re all vaxed. I’m sure those cloth masks that they keep moving up and down their faces and wearing multiple times are saving lives though.
They’re your standard cloth masks. The same ones they used all season that did more harm than good.Do you know whether they are one use masks or cleaned or whatever
US left equipment?...or equipment given to the Afghanistan government from the US and NATO coalition that they allowed to be acquired?Billions of dollars in military equipment, including drones with highly sensitive technology left behind in Afghanistan has been seized by the Taliban. Joe is too busy taking naps in between bingo game to address it.
How do you know?...the protocols, whether they are single use...how do you know?They’re your standard cloth masks. The same ones they used all season that did more harm than good.
This really a question? Did you watch the games? They constantly are grabbing the masks, pulling them down and back up during the game. Not to mention the touching of players…How do you know?...the protocols, whether they are single use...how do you know?
Again you did not quote what I said.Do u deny that the staff who compiled the report was Trump hating Democrats or that the chief of staff has had major cases that were overturned because he falsified evidence?As for Mueller he repeatedly said that he did not know much of the information in his report.He appeared to resemble Biden in cognitive declineYou have pretty much all of that wrong. Mueller himself is a Republican but he is generally so nonpartisan that he had worked in both Dem and Rep administrations and the idea that he had a "long history of manufacturing evidence" is complete and utter ********. And he did not say that he did not know what was in the report. He said he would not repeat what was in the report, when asked questions. The report made clear that the behavior of the Trump campaign committee was simply abhorrent and demonstrated that Trump has no understanding of patriotism and is happy to act corruptly secure in the knowledge that the cowards in the Republican Party would always protect him.
to make it clear, every single thing in your post is incorrect for precisely the reasons I gave aboveAgain you did not quote what I said.Do u deny that the staff who compiled the report was Trump hating Democrats or that the chief of staff has had major cases that were overturned because he falsified evidence?As for Mueller he repeatedly said that he did not know much of the information in his report.He appeared to resemble Biden in cognitive decline
You’re wrong. As you almost always are.to make it clear, every single thing in your post is incorrect for precisely the reasons I gave above
Did you read the report?You’re wrong. As you almost always are.
What? You can literally watch them every single game haha. In practices, in DBP videos. They’re on their face, around their chin, touching them. Like this isn’t even debatable, we’ve got a seasons worth of footage.How do you know?...the protocols, whether they are single use...how do you know?
to make it clear, every single thing in your post is incorrect for precisely the reasons I gave aboveNothing in my post is false.13 of the seventeen members are registered Democrats.At least three of them worked for Hillary and nine of them made donations to the Democratic Party.The other four have no known party affiliation.You have never answered my question regarding the lead Democratic attorney who has a history of submitting false evidence.Ad to Rodstein he testified under oath before Congress that had he all the information that he knew later he would not have even authorized the probe.Evem with all this they could not prove that Trump did anything
You know as well as I do that I was referring to Andrew Weissman as the attorney who has had convictions overturned due to falsifying evidenceYou have pretty much all of that wrong. Mueller himself is a Republican but he is generally so nonpartisan that he had worked in both Dem and Rep administrations and the idea that he had a "long history of manufacturing evidence" is complete and utter ********. And he did not say that he did not know what was in the report. He said he would not repeat what was in the report, when asked questions. The report made clear that the behavior of the Trump campaign committee was simply abhorrent and demonstrated that Trump has no understanding of patriotism and is happy to act corruptly secure in the knowledge that the cowards in the Republican Party would always protect him.