It started in the early 70s when the schools integrated. In school I never heard anyone of either race complain about it; white fathers refused to allow their daughters to dance with nonwhite boys. Other than that reason given, I don’t remember it being discussed much
The New Lounge
- Thread starter hpnole
- Start date
Less farmlands...great idea.
How else will you curb population growth, I mean, save the planet from the climate crisis.
Through shell companies China is buying up a **** ton as well. Nothing to see here folks. If our compromised Pres is not worried, why should we?
I was told the wall was racist. Guess that was fact check true in 2016-2020.
Just watch the first 3 minutes. Those ladies on The View are one pathetic bunch.
Charlie Kirks lawyer sent em a cease and desist letter and given the Nicholas Sandmann settlement they immediately assumed the fetal position. Aside from that, pathetic is the right word. Moronic would work as well
Can't be proven... but oh, how you BELIEVE! lol
President Trump has never been outside the establishment in his life. Thinking someone born into riches whose greatest claim to fame was his self-proclaimed wealth would ever be a genuine champion of regular people is one of the greatest con jobs in American history.
You participate in spreading something you didn't factcheck, then claim having the conversation matters.
Quick google leads to one article stating it's fake -- which includes a follow-up tweet from the comedian implying the same -- and countless retweets and links promoting the claim posted on conservative social media. You're now one of them, @GhostOf301 .
Again: We're "having the conversation" because you helped create it.
The reporter was playing "gotcha." He wanted to hold President Biden to a campaign quotation about "not one more foot" in the most literal possible sense; why would KJP play?
lol I thought you were Mr. Independent, seeing through the spin and propaganda of both sides. Now you're clutching your pearls about the View based on the hysterics of a Fox News show.
Lol. It was total sarcasm, Dat. I had no intention of having the conversation. I was clearly mocking the left in their response to the countless fake hate crimes that they pounce on before ever considering the validity of the story that the 'reeeeeeeeeeee' over. And sorry, posting an obvious satirical tweet with a sarcastic disclaimer on a college basketball message board is not helping spread anything. Lol.You participate in spreading something you didn't factcheck, then claim having the conversation matters.
Quick google leads to one article stating it's fake -- which includes a follow-up tweet from the comedian implying the same -- and countless retweets and links promoting the claim posted on conservative social media. You're now one of them, @GhostOf301 .
Again: We're "having the conversation" because you helped create it.
Ah, touché. We on the left fancy ourselves the original satirists of our wrong-minded compatriots. Well played, sir, I say; well played.
You think President Biden really has the fanaticism around him that President Trump continues to have?
No. I think it's rich that your meme portrays Trump voters harassing Biden voters as if people who voted for Trump (other than his cult like followers) didn't have to answer for every mean Tweet or dumbass gaffe for four years. And how we continue to have to answer to Trump haters any time this pototo's disastrous administration does something incredibly detrimental to the country and we bring it up. It's not exclusively on one side that this happens. There were and still are plenty of 'muh, but what about Obama?' people on the other side. It's just rich when one side wants to be the victim of said ignorance.
I didn't post it or bring it up at any other place I encounter conservatives. Just here. I stand by it. Fair point on the world beyond.
TDS. Bless your twisted little heart.
Thanks for posting the tweet though. It’s accurate and funny as hell.
Last edited:
Can't help but think this is Dat after watching a few hours of MSNBC and remembering the message board.
Not a fan, actually. I’d enjoy many of them as dinner guests, but I prefer my news less compromised. That’s a huge difference between me and most of y’all here: .However much it might feel good to hear a certain delivery from eloquent & like-minded entertainment journalists, I don’t fall in headfirst, treating their takes like Gospel. Most of y’all do exactly that: there isn’t the first sign of vetting sources, introspection, or even a MLing pause; y’all just knee-jerk re-post absolute trash and have the audacity to call anyone else “sheeple.”
You turn a phrase better than Thomas Friedman and couldn’t be any more ignorant than Paul Krugman. You could write for The NY Times. So you’re saying now that the sources on Fox haven’t been vetted. Lol