More idiocy. You can't say anything that shows where she was not a DEI. Which is why I ask the question if it is racist or good. Because if it is good, then what is wrong with pointing it out? If you can point out her accomplishments that makes her a good choice, then do so and say it is this as well as the fact that she was a DEI hire. But when Biden specifically said he was choosing based on gender as well as ethnicity, then what do you call that?
I personally think it is racist and it puts negative light on minorities who are in similar positions. It automatically raises the question of whether they are qualified or if they're just here because they checked a box. It's insulting as hell and you think it is the people who are against DEI who are the bigots.
And I didn't bring up Trump's VP because it has nothing to do with the conversation. You only want it to be so you can say that I am a hypocrite. Which is stupid as hell.
You can't prove the nonexistence of things. The burden of proof is on you to prove that she is a DEI hire. Unless you're arguing that every woman or/and BIPOC is a DEI hire for any job, stating her factual accomplishments and qualifications is all I have to do to discredit your claim, and I've done so. You rejected them because they don't fit your narrative. More intellectual dishonesty and cowardice from you.
If then candidate Biden had chosen someone solely for those reasons, you would have a point. As she was already qualified and her race and gender together was a tie-breaker, at worst, it's no different from picking a 39-year-old fake hillbilly from a swing state in hopes of appealing to young people, carrying that state, and passing the torch to the most zealous acolyte. Or choosing the Black Senator from SC to chip into the Democratic stranglehold on the Black vote. Or the moderate female gov from SC in an appeal to moderates.
There's strategy behind EVERY VP consideration. Making a big to-do about Harris is rooted in her gender and race. Turning a blind eye to strategy as it applies to Vance and every other white man is bigotry.
What's racist is how BIPOC could never be considered for a variety of positions for over 200 years. Making sure they are considered now and that they are represented now is neither racist nor a bad thing. In context, it's absolutely a good thing.
You are a bigot and I lay out exactly why every time I call you on it. I'm not playing a card. It's not kneejerk. I explain it thoroughly. You're even admitting that you automatically doubt whether minorities are actually qualified. That's because you're a bigot, like I said.