The sunshine pumpers were almost

shutzhund

All-Conference
Nov 19, 2005
29,202
2,619
0
right in predicting 7 to 8 wins this season.

Wiping out the strange loss in the first game and an almost as strange loss to U.Ga we would be standing at 7 wins and facing Austin Peay.

I know, I know you can't turn losses into wins but so darned close. I, for one, was thinking 5 to 6 wins and laughing about the insane predictions of winning 7 much less 8.

From now on I'm going to give you the respect you deserve. For sure you will be more fun to hang out with than the PODs of which I was almost a charter member.I'm trading in my sack cloth and ashes for a smile.
 

olblue

All-Conference
Aug 17, 2011
3,132
1,384
113
right in predicting 7 to 8 wins this season.

Wiping out the strange loss in the first game and an almost as strange loss to U.Ga we would be standing at 7 wins and facing Austin Peay.

I know, I know you can't turn losses into wins but so darned close. I, for one, was thinking 5 to 6 wins and laughing about the insane predictions of winning 7 much less 8.

From now on I'm going to give you the respect you deserve. For sure you will be more fun to hang out with than the PODs of which I was almost a charter member.I'm trading in my sack cloth and ashes for a smile.

UK also won a game on a hail mary field goal and saw Vandy drop a pass in the end zone that would have sent that one in to OT. These things even out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ky8335

The-Hack

Heisman
Oct 1, 2016
24,463
42,984
0
Well, I'll pump a little more sunshine . . . . we ain't lost to the Cards, yet.

And shutz . . . . if preseason, you were laughing at any prediction of more than 6 wins, haven't you been sated by the actual result? You nailed it, and it was a reasonable expectation.

And if we handle Peay, we can at a minimum pump some more sunshine for a beatdown of a decent MAC team, or somebody (and practice, practice, practice!)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Shydog

shutzhund

All-Conference
Nov 19, 2005
29,202
2,619
0
Well, I'll pump a little more sunshine . . . . we ain't lost to the Cards, yet.

And shutz . . . . if preseason, you were laughing at any prediction of more than 6 wins, haven't you been sated by the actual result? You nailed it, and it was a reasonable expectation.

And if we handle Peay, we can at a minimum pump some more sunshine for a beatdown of a decent MAC team, or somebody (and practice, practice, practice!)


Originally I would probably gotten lost in blaming coaches, qb, defensive line and ticket takers because we didn't beat the two mentioned. I still want to win badly and defeat is barely tolerable but I know there's a better day a'coming and the blame game is destructive.

Extra practices, bowl experience is not to be ignored and I don't care which bowl.
Well, I'll pump a little more sunshine . . . . we ain't lost to the Cards, yet.

And shutz . . . . if preseason, you were laughing at any prediction of more than 6 wins, haven't you been sated by the actual result? You nailed it, and it was a reasonable expectation.

And if we handle Peay, we can at a minimum pump some more sunshine for a beatdown of a decent MAC team, or somebody (and practice, practice, practice!)


I was definitely wrong on my preseason and post two game opinion. What happened is that rookie coaches and young, but good, recruits are finding their way. Next year, with continued good recruiting, we'll begin making lots of noise in the SEC.

The question will be can we keep Stoops and the staff.
 

floboi03

Senior
Apr 8, 2009
951
638
93
To put it in perspective, had we beat USM whom we were up on by 25 at one point, we would be getting our 7th win on Saturday. No one really thought we were going to lose that game. But we did and here we are setting on 6 wins. That is the loss that haunts me to this day. No idea how we were that bad in the 2nd half of the game.

Difference between this team and Brooks' 06 team, they went 3-1 in non conference only losing to UofL. We're looking to go 2-2 in non conference. (I see no way of beating UofL). But had we beat USM this season has went exactly how Brooks' 06 team went.
 

UKFootball78

All-Conference
Sep 1, 2013
683
1,028
56
UK also won a game on a hail mary field goal and saw Vandy drop a pass in the end zone that would have sent that one in to OT. These things even out.
Yeah...kinda like that "hail mary" field goal Georgia needed to beat UK. Things do usually even out. I though UK had a chance at 8 this year before the season...maybe that makes me a sunshine pumper. But the only two games I missed on was USM and Georgia. Both are games UK should have won.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cat888

UKSanders_rivals37733

All-American
Jan 1, 2003
8,634
8,736
0
To put it in perspective, had we beat USM whom we were up on by 25 at one point, we would be getting our 7th win on Saturday. No one really thought we were going to lose that game. But we did and here we are setting on 6 wins. That is the loss that haunts me to this day. No idea how we were that bad in the 2nd half of the game.

Difference between this team and Brooks' 06 team, they went 3-1 in non conference only losing to UofL. We're looking to go 2-2 in non conference. (I see no way of beating UofL). But had we beat USM this season has went exactly how Brooks' 06 team went.


And the one stat that is explains the difference in the records of the 06 vs 16 teams? Turnover margin

2006 = plus 15
2016 = minus 9


The 2006 Cats were more opportunistic as they were 3rd in the nation in turnover margin. As good as Woodson was about NOT throwing picks, dude could take some sacks as the team was 1 more sack per game from being dead last in the country. Despite that, the 2006 team had only 10 fumbles lost compared to 14 already for the 2016 squad.
 

Mike-D

Heisman
Jul 14, 2001
48,916
69,951
113
right in predicting 7 to 8 wins this season.

Wiping out the strange loss in the first game and an almost as strange loss to U.Ga we would be standing at 7 wins and facing Austin Peay.

I know, I know you can't turn losses into wins but so darned close. I, for one, was thinking 5 to 6 wins and laughing about the insane predictions of winning 7 much less 8.

From now on I'm going to give you the respect you deserve. For sure you will be more fun to hang out with than the PODs of which I was almost a charter member.I'm trading in my sack cloth and ashes for a smile.

Pump your way to the top!
 

olblue

All-Conference
Aug 17, 2011
3,132
1,384
113
Yeah...kinda like that "hail mary" field goal Georgia needed to beat UK. Things do usually even out. I though UK had a chance at 8 this year before the season...maybe that makes me a sunshine pumper. But the only two games I missed on was USM and Georgia. Both are games UK should have won.

There is a big difference between a 25 yard chip shot and a career long 51 yarder.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PowerofPelphrey

sluggercatfan

Heisman
Aug 17, 2004
35,953
29,631
0
Well, I'll pump a little more sunshine . . . . we ain't lost to the Cards, yet.

And shutz . . . . if preseason, you were laughing at any prediction of more than 6 wins, haven't you been sated by the actual result? You nailed it, and it was a reasonable expectation.

And if we handle Peay, we can at a minimum pump some more sunshine for a beatdown of a decent MAC team, or somebody (and practice, practice, practice!)
As much chance to beat Otis as Ala...slim and none...biggest difference is Saban took it easy, but BP won't..65-17.
 

Mr Schwump

Heisman
Nov 4, 2006
29,563
23,097
18
Last time I checked they both counted for two. If you want to play that game, Georgia got a freak interception on what would have been a TD, which would have almost certainly sealed the game for the Cats.
I think a FG counts as 3 unless there's been a rules change.
 
  • Like
Reactions: olblue

Beatle Bum

Heisman
Sep 1, 2002
39,947
60,391
113
I said 6 wins would be a successful season for this young defensive squad. I thought 5 was a reasonable pick. The team has improved. We clearly cannot take injuries at key positions and until the UT game we were pretty healthy. Hopefully we will have more depth next year.
 

The-Hack

Heisman
Oct 1, 2016
24,463
42,984
0
Hey Brown is the New Blue . . . . that 51 yarder was not a career long field goal. He has at least 2 others that were longer, one being the school record
 

Poetax

Heisman
Apr 4, 2002
29,410
20,887
0
I said 6 wins would be a successful season for this young defensive squad. I thought 5 was a reasonable pick. The team has improved. We clearly cannot take injuries at key positions and until the UT game we were pretty healthy. Hopefully we will have more depth next year.

That was my guess too, for those who guessed 7 or 8, you were so close.
 

gamalielkid

All-American
Mar 21, 2002
6,090
6,632
113
That was my guess too, for those who guessed 7 or 8, you were so close.
I posted 7 or 8. Typical UK breaks - unfortunately- I continue to believe things will fall for us one day. I still think about the 4 coaches we could have had as our head coach that are going to major bowls this year. I like Stoops and hope he gets it done too!

Go Big Blue!
 

EnPassant

Heisman
May 29, 2001
52,495
14,066
18
Yeah...kinda like that "hail mary" field goal Georgia needed to beat UK. Things do usually even out. I though UK had a chance at 8 this year before the season...maybe that makes me a sunshine pumper. But the only two games I missed on was USM and Georgia. Both are games UK should have won.

Georgia outgained UK 460-308, having double the passing yards and more rushing yards as well. Was a close game that could've gone either way but no way UK "should have won."
 

*Bleedingblue*

Heisman
Mar 5, 2009
39,695
30,599
113
right in predicting 7 to 8 wins this season.

Wiping out the strange loss in the first game and an almost as strange loss to U.Ga we would be standing at 7 wins and facing Austin Peay.

I know, I know you can't turn losses into wins but so darned close. I, for one, was thinking 5 to 6 wins and laughing about the insane predictions of winning 7 much less 8.

From now on I'm going to give you the respect you deserve. For sure you will be more fun to hang out with than the PODs of which I was almost a charter member.I'm trading in my sack cloth and ashes for a smile.


Im not following you. Most everybody was saying 6 wins and a bowl game. We at 5 wins and looking like finishing up at 6 and a bowl.
Where was the reasonable onlookers wrong and pumpers right?
 

olblue

All-Conference
Aug 17, 2011
3,132
1,384
113
Last time I checked they both counted for two. If you want to play that game, Georgia got a freak interception on what would have been a TD, which would have almost certainly sealed the game for the Cats.

Actually a FG on the Lair counts for three. But I can understand why you would think they are worth two. You are now welcome to go back to the Rafters.
 

UKFootball78

All-Conference
Sep 1, 2013
683
1,028
56
Georgia outgained UK 460-308, having double the passing yards and more rushing yards as well. Was a close game that could've gone either way but no way UK "should have won."

Really, I think you're forgetting the gift interception that would have resulted in a touchdown had it not been bobbled behind the receiver to Georgia's defender. No way should that pass have been dropped. Add those 7 to UKs score and at worst the game goes to overtime is Georgia is able to score a TD instead of FG at the end. Yes Georgia had more yards but UKs defense kept them from scoring TDs on all but 2 drives. Many teams win while gaining less yards.
 

shutzhund

All-Conference
Nov 19, 2005
29,202
2,619
0
Im not following you. Most everybody was saying 6 wins and a bowl game. We at 5 wins and looking like finishing up at 6 and a bowl.
Where was the reasonable onlookers wrong and pumpers right?


Just cherry picking this one but would you call Andre a reasonable onlooker. There are many, of which you're evidently not one, who continually and still do who take every opportunity to find fault with the staff and the team. Not the majority of posters but the most persistent and predictable.

They have every right to be gloomy and negative and like Andre all they need to do is post their names and the message is obvious without further elaboration.

But frankly I fear you missed the point of the original post. I guess I assumed too much.
 

Xception

Heisman
Apr 17, 2007
26,407
22,344
0
 

JC CATS

Heisman
Jun 18, 2009
23,517
12,221
0
Hey Brown is the New Blue . . . . that 51 yarder was not a career long field goal. He has at least 2 others that were longer, one being the school record
Yeak I would take our kicker in that situation all day. Hey Brown, don't let facts get in the way
 

EnPassant

Heisman
May 29, 2001
52,495
14,066
18
Really, I think you're forgetting the gift interception that would have resulted in a touchdown had it not been bobbled behind the receiver to Georgia's defender. No way should that pass have been dropped. Add those 7 to UKs score and at worst the game goes to overtime is Georgia is able to score a TD instead of FG at the end. Yes Georgia had more yards but UKs defense kept them from scoring TDs on all but 2 drives. Many teams win while gaining less yards.

Yeah but we also fumbled twice deep in our own territory and once deep in yours - one fumble deep in our territory was a muffed punt, an unforced error. I acknowledged that either team could've won the game (obv) but no loser could say "we should've" as opposed to "we could've" won that game.

In the end it doesn't matter - you either win or you lose of course.
 

WildcatofNati

Heisman
Mar 31, 2009
8,183
12,420
0
UK also won a game on a hail mary field goal and saw Vandy drop a pass in the end zone that would have sent that one in to OT. These things even out.
Not a "Hail Mary" field goal, UofLOL fan. A Hail Mary has a five percent chance at best. Austin is going to hit that field goal at least half of the time.
 

sefus12

Heisman
Dec 22, 2007
6,614
17,380
103
Actually a FG on the Lair counts for three. But I can understand why you would think they are worth two. You are now welcome to go back to the Rafters.

Go back a few threads big guy. I noted my mistake. I'm quite aware of what a FG is worth but was doing about three things at once (two others not football/basketball/sports related) and used the wrong word.
 

cat888

Senior
Jul 23, 2006
1,936
770
113
And the one stat that is explains the difference in the records of the 06 vs 16 teams? Turnover margin

2006 = plus 15
2016 = minus 9


The 2006 Cats were more opportunistic as they were 3rd in the nation in turnover margin. As good as Woodson was about NOT throwing picks, dude could take some sacks as the team was 1 more sack per game from being dead last in the country. Despite that, the 2006 team had only 10 fumbles lost compared to 14 already for the 2016 squad.
THE 06 team also did not lose its starting Quarterback.