This seems like a total flip out of a response. Maybe I have missed something, but I didn't see that poster say anything about shutting down the country or any of that. Why attack a guy who merely suggested that there were reports that the collapse was from complications from the virus? Just for good measure, I watched a 25 year old ex-football player get buried last week from complications from the virus. While it may not affect those college age athletes the same way as the elderly, it can still affect them. My wife had to put a 20 year old on the vent this week, and her best friend and college roommate is dangerously close to going on one as well at 38.
While I am not one to say shut everything down, I am one that says some people need to take it a little more seriously than they do. But to each his own. Just because you disagree with someone's stance doesn't mean you have to attack them, which I see all too often on here.
As to the original question, by the time the late season arrives, the athletes of most sports are likely going to have the opportunity to get vaccinated. Probably won't happen for a couple of months, but likely by March. The frontline workers should have the first opportunity at that, followed by the highest risk people, but then when you are down to the general public, it will likely go by exposure, and these athletes would be more at exposure than most of the general public through transportation and performances.
I hope the team gets vaccinated soon though, this social distancing they are practicing on defense is causing major problems.