First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out—and we all laughed when they took Alex Jones down...
lol. It's f'n facebook.First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out—
and amazon and google. You know just some of the largest corporations in the worldlol. It's f'n facebook.
Just ignore that fool. He's literally not worth engaging.and amazon and google. You know just some of the largest corporations in the world
Right....private business.and amazon and google. You know just some of the largest corporations in the world
that receive how much in government funds? and give access to the intelligence communities?Right....private business.
Take away their federal funding. I'm all for it. I hate corporate welfare. You are actively wanting government to take over industry. Wrap it up in whatever anti-statism you want to call it. Gonna be a no from me, dog.that receive how much in government funds? and give access to the intelligence communities?
Like I told Moe the other day the one thing I will not defend is Statism. These corporations use the power of government for a competitive advantage.
^^^^ is okay with suppression on speech ^^^^Right....private business.
No, I didn't. I know better than giving government control over a speech platform.Take away their federal funding. I'm all for it. I hate corporate welfare. You are actively wanting government to take over industry. Wrap it up in whatever anti-statism you want to call it. Gonna be a no from me, dog.
just curious, if you use this argument, does this also mean that you have been against all business lockdowns since March?Right....private business.
Correct. Happens on this ******* board all the time. It is a private business's prerogative. The government suppressing speech is a different matter.^^^^ is okay with suppression on speech ^^^^
What does crony capitalism have to do with a private business kicking someone off?No, I didn't. I know better than giving government control over a speech platform.
But Im not going to act as if this crony ******** is capitalism either
1 million percent. I also think the term lockdown is over blown. It's not nearly as oppressive as people whine about.just curious, if you use this argument, does this also mean that you have been against all business lockdowns since March?
At least you're still able to ******* say the ******* words... or in this case the f.ucking words.Correct. Happens on this ****ing board all the time. It is a private business's prerogative. The government suppressing speech is a different matter.
Edit - See? This ****ing board suppressed my ****ing speech. OUTRAGE
Unless of course you're a small business owner1 million percent. I also think the term lockdown is over blown. It's not nearly as oppressive as people whine about.
tell that to the people that lost their businesses1 million percent. I also think the term lockdown is over blown. It's not nearly as oppressive as people whine about.
As is anyone banned from social media website XAt least you're still able to ****ing say the ****ing words... or in this case the f.ucking words.
the problem is not that Twitter is kicking people off, it is the hypocrisy. A baker cant deny a customer because he doesn't want to back a gay couple a wedding cake and it goes to supreme courtAs is anyone banned from social media website X
Yeah but I think SCOTUS ruled on religious freedom and not 1Athe problem is not that Twitter is kicking people off, it is the hypocrisy. A baker cant deny a customer because he doesn't want to back a gay couple a wedding cake and it goes to supreme court
OK. I have. Along with telling them government restrictions were/are wrong. They should be furious at them.tell that to the people that lost their businesses
I am. Small businesses were crushed by consumers staying home and saving their money. Some of that can be attributed to government restrictions. Some to the shock of a pandemic. Some out of fear for the virus and financial woes. It's been an unfathomably ****** year.Unless of course you're a small business owner
A baker can though, can't they? Isn't that what the SC said?the problem is not that Twitter is kicking people off, it is the hypocrisy. A baker cant deny a customer because he doesn't want to back a gay couple a wedding cake and it goes to supreme court
yes after years in courtA baker can though, can't they? Isn't that what the SC said?
he hasnt been in government for yearsAnother seditionist bites the dust. If he voted (probably did) to not accept the election, he and everyone else who voted the same should resign immediately.
Yes but I think they ruled based on religious freedom and not 1A.A baker can though, can't they? Isn't that what the SC said?
Oops mixed him up with his son.he hasnt been in government for years
Lol moe dont have a clue ...he hasnt been in government for years
Yes but I think they ruled based on religious freedom and not 1A.
one of the few good onesOne of the most reasonable men in politics.
Do you think this case applies to the Trump-Twitter issue?The decision was that Colorado violated the bakers 1A right to freedom of religion.