This could be a pretty big deal

Cobie

Sophomore
Jul 2, 2025
242
105
43
Our offense was largely a two-man show last season.

We need a versatile RB to replace Sanders and take some of the pressure off of Sellers who is going to have entire defenses zeroing in on him this season.

Let's see which way the wind blows.

 

Gradstudent

Joined Feb 11, 2006
Feb 2, 2022
1,311
1,904
113
Seems to me the NCAA hates this loophole and purposely slow plays, to discourage.

But lets hope for the best

 

18IsTheMan

Heisman
Oct 1, 2014
15,003
12,865
113
In principle, I don't think he should be granted the waiver. He began playing college ball in 2019. However, the NCAA parted ways with principles a long time ago. Based on recent decisions, there's no logical reason his waiver shouldn't be granted. But like principles, the NCAA parted ways with logic a long time ago.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sclawman77

will110

Joined Aug 17, 2018
Jan 20, 2022
12,514
32,233
113
In principle, I don't think he should be granted the waiver. He began playing college ball in 2019. However, the NCAA parted ways with principles a long time ago. Based on recent decisions, there's no logical reason his waiver shouldn't be granted. But like principles, the NCAA parted ways with logic a long time ago.
He didn't play in 2019. That's the main reason he is trying to get the waiver. He didn't play D1 college football until 2023.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Birdman 70

Cobie

Sophomore
Jul 2, 2025
242
105
43
As the article above touches on, the chances that he'll be allowed to play have probably increased with all of this foot dragging. Hanging a guy/school out for this long to reject him would be a terrible look. DOGE needs to head over to the NCAA Clown Show next and clean house.