Feel that way if it makes you feel better sunshine, flood is demonstrably better at coaching than both ash and chop…PERIOD END OF ****ING STORY.
Cope better
Flood definitely was better than Ash and as for Kyle being superior to G2, won't get an argument from me.
But looking back fondly in the Falood era is only because Ruters was so bad inder Ash and the imitation we call Schiano2
Schiano1 , flaws and all, was better then his replacements and that includes the version of him we're seeing now.
Flood is looked on as a success now , because he's the most successful failure .
When it comes to success, to reach it in their HCs , Rutgers fans need to set the bar low to claim a HC was a success
Flood (26-22)won more than he lost, some might call him a success because of that.
But Kyle wasn't going to bring the program to glory and his program's off field antics were an embarrassment
Granted the AD wanted him gone, the fans and booster didn't want him.
He stayed as long as he did because no one was willing to put up the money to buy him out.
After Kyle circumvents the academic support staff and contacted a Professor Rutgers then fired him and gave him his $1.5 mil buyout