Toggle sidebar

This is why

dave

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,598
814
113
Libs lecturing anyone over integrity. Just last night you were asking people what Hillary did that was crooked. Just STFU.
 
K

Keyser76

Freshman
Apr 7, 2010
11,912
58
0
dave said:
Libs lecturing anyone over integrity. Just last night you were asking people what Hillary did that was crooked. Just STFU.
Click to expand...
Do you ever address the topic? lol. Hillary ain't being investigated or anyone who worked for her campaign being indicted, ya'll are lost when the boogeyman is your own boy in the white house.
 
dave

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,598
814
113
Keyser76 said:
Do you ever address the topic? lol. Hillary ain't being investigated or anyone who worked for her campaign being indicted, ya'll are lost when the boogeyman is your own boy in the white house.
Click to expand...
There is nothing to address moron. We all agreed a long time ago to wait and see what the Mueller investigation found. If any of you fuktards want to question anyones integrity though parson me for pointing out rampant hypocrisy.
 
K

Keyser76

Freshman
Apr 7, 2010
11,912
58
0
dave said:
There is nothing to address moron. We all agreed a long time ago to wait and see what the Mueller investigation found. If any of you fuktards want to question anyones integrity though parson me for pointing out rampant hypocrisy.
Click to expand...
The topic question posed?, that is usually what I am addressing when I post unless I am replying to a poster. Why so angry? You won.
 
dave

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,598
814
113
Keyser76 said:
The topic question posed?, that is usually what I am addressing when I post unless I am replying to a poster. Why so angry? You won.
Click to expand...
The topic being posed was congress not sure whether to block trump from firing Mueller and he isnt firing him. What more am I supposed to say?
 
K

Keyser76

Freshman
Apr 7, 2010
11,912
58
0
dave said:
The topic being posed was congress not sure whether to block trump from firing Mueller and he isnt firing him. What more am I supposed to say?
Click to expand...
Uh, something about the topic, instead of telling him to STFU?
 
DvlDog4WVU

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
47,206
3,282
113
countryroads89 said:
I don't believe trump will be impeached....even if he were to commit murder. Most politicians have lost all integrity. It's party over country.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...mueller-from-being-ousted-by-trump/ar-BBIluNC
Click to expand...
Nothing in that is party over country. Good lord. That’s your perception of how it is. Opening paragraph states the positioning. There is no reason to put those protections in place because it’s not necessary. And before you cite the report from June, that was almost 8 months ago and he’s still doing his thing. It’s fine.

What the desire for Dems in this scenario is to create a firewall to prevent Trump from blocking the investigation moving into matters outside of Collusion. They also want to continue to propagate the uncontrollable lunatic narrative.
 
dave

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,598
814
113
[QUOTE="DvlDog4WVU, post: 1862465, member: 3664"They also want to continue to propagate the uncontrollable lunatic narrative.[/QUOTE]
This is all it is. The dems want to guilt Congress into this so they can claim their lunacy is bipartisan.
 
C

countryroads89_rivals

Sophomore
Sep 6, 2013
27,594
120
0
DvlDog4WVU said:
Nothing in that is party over country. Good lord. That’s your perception of how it is. Opening paragraph states the positioning. There is no reason to put those protections in place because it’s not necessary. And before you cite the report from June, that was almost 8 months ago and he’s still doing his thing. It’s fine.

What the desire for Dems in this scenario is to create a firewall to prevent Trump from blocking the investigation moving into matters outside of Collusion. They also want to continue to propagate the uncontrollable lunatic narrative.
Click to expand...

No reason: it’s already been confirmed he considered firing Mueller and even directed McGahn to fire Mueller. McCabe justcstepped down today and Congressional GOP members are no joining on the narrative of trashing Rosenstein’s integrity.

Matters outside of collusion: the investigation already had that latitude - the appointment authority of the SC has already been documented and argued in this forum.
 
T

TarHeelEer

Freshman
Dec 15, 2002
89,304
53
48
countryroads89 said:
No reason: it’s already been confirmed he considered firing Mueller and even directed McGahn to fire Mueller. McCabe justcstepped down today and Congressional GOP members are no joining on the narrative of trashing Rosenstein’s integrity.
Click to expand...

Neither McCabe nor Rosenstein report to Mueller. Nor do Comey, Strzok any longer, Page, Schiff, Lynch, Bill, Hillary, nor Obama, for starters. Noone is directly trashing Mueller's investigation, although it will be impacted - Fruit of the poison tree.

Why is Rosenstein being trashed? Could it be that he is an Obama holdover that approved the use of an FSB propaganda paper for use as evidence in FISA court? I think that'd be worth being trashed over.

countryroads89 said:
Matters outside of collusion: the investigation already had that latitude - the appointment authority of the SC has already been documented and argued in this forum.
Click to expand...

And certainly not settled on the side you are arguing, at least yet. A court will determine that on Manafort's behalf.
 
bornaneer

bornaneer

All-Conference
Jan 23, 2014
30,931
1,633
113
countryroads89 said:
No reason: it’s already been confirmed he considered firing Mueller and even directed McGahn to fire Mueller. McCabe justcstepped down today and Congressional GOP members are no joining on the narrative of trashing Rosenstein’s integrity.

Matters outside of collusion: the investigation already had that latitude - the appointment authority of the SC has already been documented and argued in this forum.
Click to expand...
If Trump really wanted to fire Mueller he would have done it. This McGahn crap is all ******** and hearsay.
 
dave

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,598
814
113
countryroads89 said:
No reason: it’s already been confirmed he considered firing Mueller and even directed McGahn to fire Mueller. McCabe justcstepped down today and Congressional GOP members are no joining on the narrative of trashing Rosenstein’s integrity.

Matters outside of collusion: the investigation already had that latitude - the appointment authority of the SC has already been documented and argued in this forum.
Click to expand...
Dumbest argument ever. Trump didnt fire Mueller then and why would he fire him now? Soooo shocked you would go there.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom