Fair enough! The reality though and I know people will disagree is that Louisville football in terms of a program is a lot closer to UK than we are to FSU and Clemson right now. Hopefully that changes and then we can talk about bigger fish on the schedule.
Well clearly this year UofL is not close to Clemson. You aren't paying attention to FSU, or are giving them some different set of rules for evaluation though if you don't think UofL is close to them. They are a mediocre team right now, as is UofL, as is UK.
You want to take a snapshot picture in time when UofL is at a bit of a low these days, that's a weird form of overall program evaluation.
If you stand by the "What have you done for me lately" critique, then yeah you may be on to something. And if you're going to just look the other way at all the UofL accomplishments over the years and ignore the fact that UK has done virtually nothing over the same time period, then that's your choice to ignore reality.
That's not how typical fans evaluate their programs though, on a week to week basis. They review recent history, and even go a little further back in time...a lot goes into program evaluation.
Cards have finished a season ranked 8 times since 2000, under 4 different coaching regimes. UK hasn't finished a season ranked since 1984, under countless failing coaching regimes.
It's a real insult to the UofL program for you to say what you're saying, it's like you're over compensating to put some value on the UK game that isn't really there.
They have a long history of sucking, UofL does not. UofL has danced with top shelf programs at times, UK fan starts thinking basketball this time of year every year.
That's it.