Looking forward to getting rid of a few kids are ya?Oh, this is gonna be one hell of a thread. Can't wait.
Nice article and something positive for a change. Regardless of what some on here think, every time we make these changes, I think we get behind even more.
Nice article
A Semisonic reference. Well done, sirEvery new beginning comes from some other beginnings end.
It's "closing time" for Riley.A Semisonic reference. Well done, sir
It's not that far fetched to believe 98% of the players stay once they talk to the new coach.
It is unreal. I think it's a bush league move. Very unprofessional IMO. Not going to give them a click.Holy crap. A sportswriter contacted a players parent about the future of his sons head coach? Un freaking real.
So, in fact Nebraska was built in 3 years - and some may argue in 2 years.
How's that?I think this article is pretty telling as to why HCMR has not really had much success at Nebraska.
Not surprised someone who built a relationship with Riley would be supportive of keeping him longer. It seems things are farther from where we want to be than they were 4 years ago, although I do feel the culture and relationship of players with fans has improved.
Living in Ohio, I do worry that Nebraska could fall into the 'Cleveland Browns Syndrome'. Changing staffs/AD/etc every 3 to 4 years will erode the baseline to a point where rebuilding is a monumental task, rather than the seemingly achievable one faced now. I think Moos(and the donors/fanbase) should consider this offseason a watershed time. If Riley stays, then stop the rumors(probably not feasible). If he is gone, then the new coaches need 5 years minimum to establish some modicum of consistency. I feel MR made things worse for himself in not biting the bullet and establishing his system in year 1, it is clearly hurting the team now when they should be accelerating success due to efficiency rather than climbing the learning curve.
We certainly did this last time.Nice article and something positive for a change. Regardless of what some on here think, every time we make these changes, I think we get behind even more.
Nice article and something positive for a change. Regardless of what some on here think, every time we make these changes, I think we get behind even more.
I couldn't care less what KJ has to say. But, to his point ---- Huskers were 3-6-1 in 1691, and 15-32-1 in 5 years under Bill Jennings when the Bobfather came to town. Devaney went 9-2; 5-2 in '62, 10-0 and won the Big 8 at 7-0 his SECOND year, 9-2 and won his SECOND consecutive Big 8 title in his THIRD year - and the rest, as they say is history. So, in fact Nebraska was built in 3 years - and some may argue in 2 years.
will be in the B1G championship game 3 years (at most) into the regime