I'm usually pretty optimistic heading out of the spring game. I thought Saturday offered a pretty sobering dose of reality though. Three thoughts on the Cats spring performance;
1. UK's defensive line. My goodness. I'm not sure where to start. Clearly, this unit is going to seriously struggle. SEC opponents are going to run the football at will against UK's front seven. UK's pass rush was pretty much a joke last year. More of the same is awfully likely. This is especially frustrating because I think the secondary is actually pretty good. Unfortunately, that won't matter much with no pass rush.
2. UK's offensive tackles. My goodness. UK looks like they'll be alright at the guard and center spots, but tackle is another story. I'll say the same thing now that I said three months ago. If Meadows is on the field, UK is in deep trouble. And honestly, I can't see Mosier holding up in one-on-one pass block situations. But....
3. ...Eddie Gran is going to rely more on the running game, which could be a strength. I don't know that this line is going to be especially good at either run or pass blocking, but I'm betting they're better when running the ball. Mosier/Meadows pass blocking one-on-one gives me nightmares. Hopefully, Leavitt and Young are both the real deal and develop quickly.
Three schedule thoughts;
1. Don't take Southern Miss for granted. Sure, USM lost some key guys on offense, but they return a QB that passed for 4,476 yards last season. The Cats d-line will face a huge test right away. They won't be able to let this guy just sit in the pocket with all day to throw.
2. Kentucky has its issues, no doubt. But so does Vanderbilt. And Missouri. And South Carolina. And possibly Mississippi State. Can Stoops take advantage (three of these games are in Lexington)?
3. Is there a path to six wins? If UK goes 3-1 in the four SEC games I mentioned, sure. Maybe UK stays healthy and those teams don't. Maybe UK catches breaks that they rarely catch. Who knows, but I think there are 7-8 opponents on the schedule that Kentucky "could" beat. That probably means a 5-7 or so finish.
GBB!!!
LB's are young - but talented I think. Net, they will ultimately improve the run D & pass rush. Ware is a decent rusher I'd say. Yes, inside DL is a problem. Have I ever told you we need more/better DT's? Well, I do.
I think you cut up Mosier way too much. I do think we'd be better with him at RT & Leavett at LT, but that assumes TL comes on to be the player we thought we were signing. But since our interior OL is a strength, we ought to be able to run. But, I've about given up on Horton having an impact, JoJo is so so, King is little, & who knows where Boom's head is.
Not sure why you're worried why a 5-7 team would take SM for granted. If they beat us, it won't be for that imo. But OK.
Re the DL...a glance of the official stat sheet of the scrimmage shows the Blue DL, the line thought to be the starters at least now, COMBINED for a total of....ONE assist in the tackle department. No sacks, no TFL, no solo tackles but from Elam, Meant and Miggins all they could muster was ONE paltry assist. By count the White team ran 55 plays, one would think the Blue DL could've at least accidently tripped and fallen on someone at least once. Of course maybe they did, that's where the one assist came from. There's going to be many long Saturdays this fall if people don't step up and make plays.
This x 100I would not get too low or too high based on a spring game.
Apologies if previously addressed but how did the "Unblockable" player look Saturday?
Very disappointing thread. I would only point out that we are undergoing a complete rebuild of the DL having lost all contributors the past year, same thing with the LB corps. I would suggest holding off judgement until you can see the finished product.
Im definitely an optimist when it comes to our football team and what Stoops is building.
But I absolutely share your concerns around the OT and Dline positions. And the spring game did nothing but heighten those fears.
At Tackle, the lack of success of Leavitt is very disheartening. We needed he and Young to be immediate upgrades in the worst way. The good news is that Meadows and Mosier DO look to have improved and Leavitt will get better. BUT in my opinion it becomes absolutely imparative at this point that Young lives up to his ranking and locks down a Left tackle spot from the jump. IF he does that the offense can still be very good. As the interior Oline looks solid and you can hide one subpar Tackle much much easier than you can two (as we saw last year)
The Dline just reaks of no legit SEC talent much less NFL talent. We had that the last 3 years with Stoops and still struggled to stop the run and pressure the QB. Can we honestly say any of our 2 deep Dline would start or even play significant roles on any other SEC team? Miggins looks to have the best combination of athleticism and size. But other than that it looks sparse. I'm just not optimistic that Elam ever develops. He just doesn't seem to have the discipline or desire to get significantly better. And Meant is just limited and is what he is. For someone that you hear about being physical as his best trait, he seems to constantly being washed down the line of scrimmage or 3 yards off the ball. Middleton and Bell still looks like nonfactors, Daniel still looks a year or two away and Pringle was dominated in the Spring game. Not a glowing outlook. Perhaps Looney, Cross or the Dubose surprise. And I hope to god we get the Nebraska transfer to come in and make a difference.
We just need to try and be serviceable on the Dline this year. The good news is we have lots of big bodies and that hasn't always been the case. I frankly think the 3-4 needs to go this year. Stack the line of scrimmage and take your chance with the secondary holding up much more often then not.
I really think we can be much better in 2017 on defense. Guys like Meant, Middleton, Elam, and Dubose will all have been around for 4 years. Add a couple of redshirts in Cross and Looney and hopefully a highly ranked Hudson and a juco Provitt. Still not ready to be a dominant Dline but it starts to look a lot more like a Miss St or Mizzo Dline with grown men playing even if they aren't the most talented.
I will bet a couple of the DL from last year will play in the league. We had some good players there before injuries.
The defense played well enough last year that of we had ANY offense at all we at least win three (otis, Fla, vandy) more games last year...you CANNOT average 18 ppg-- well maybe Alabama could -- and expect to win in today's college football and that is my biggest fear with Mark Stoops... If this year's team can average 30-35 PPG I think we will surprise a lot of peopleThen either that doesn't speak very well of our coaching staff or our players sucked because we were horrid on D last year too. So we're either going to still suck because the coaching staff sucks or we'll improve because we have better players this year.
I'm usually pretty optimistic heading out of the spring game. I thought Saturday offered a pretty sobering dose of reality though. Three thoughts on the Cats spring performance;
1. UK's defensive line. My goodness. I'm not sure where to start. Clearly, this unit is going to seriously struggle. SEC opponents are going to run the football at will against UK's front seven.
That will be what tanks the season IMO. Unless they can go out and *somewhat* stop the run, we're doomed.