He won’t but he has a legit shot. 7 back can be tailchased and passed.
Don’t know if his back and hands are strong enough anymore. I wish he would, just for old times sake.He won’t but he has a legit shot. 7 back can be tailchased and passed.
I don't, lol.I really want him to win one more major.
Here's why he isn't IMO....Many will argue it, but in my book, he is the greatest golfer of all time.
I don't, lol.
Here's why he isn't IMO....
In terms of Majors-
-Nicklaus leads Woods 18 to 15.
-Nicklaus has 19 runner-up finishes to just 7 for Woods. Nicklaus has 9 3rd place finishes vs just 4 for Woods.
-Woods has 26 top-threes, and Nicklaus has 46 top-threes.
-Nicklaus is the only golfer to win the Players 3 times.
-Nicklaus made 43 starts at the Masters over a span of nearly a half-century. Of his 163 rounds at the tournament, more than 40 were played after he turned 50.
-From the 1970 British Open through the 1978 British Open, he finished in the top 10 in 31 of 33 majors
In overall terms-
-Woods has 82 victories in his career and Nicklaus 72.
-Nicklaus had 57 runner-up finishes and 269 top-10s while Woods had 31 runner-up finishes and 199 top-10s.
-Nicklaus played for the USA in 7 World Cups, was on the winning side for 6 and was the individual winner 3 times.
-Woods played for the USA in 3 World Cups and was on the winning side 2x. He won the individual once.
-Nicklaus has twice been captain of the US Ryder Cup team and four times captain of the US Presidents Cup Team. Woods has played in 9 instalments of the Presidents Cup and has been playing captain once.
With the exception of total wins and lack of drama, Nicklaus beats Woods in every category.
Nicklaus had tougher competition. Tiger carried the tour for fifteen years.
Personally, I think Woods faced tougher competition. However, he also had the benefit of equipment technology advancements. And yes, fitness was more of a thing in his era.Fully disagree.
If Woods played in the Nicholas area with his same skill, stamina, dedication to fitness, he would have been even more dominant.
We will have to agree to disagreePersonally, I think Woods faced tougher competition. However, he also had the benefit of equipment technology advancements. And yes, fitness was more of a thing in his era.
Still, in terms of overall dominance over a long period of time and for lack of drama, it isn't close IMO.
He would not have had all the new equipment that he had to play with in his era.. it would be fun to have seen thoFully disagree.
If Woods played in the Nicholas area with his same skill, stamina, dedication to fitness, he would have been even more dominant.
Yes sir, he did.That didn't age well, at +15 now question is; will he finish dead last?
I think the steroids destroyed his body.The biggest thing about Tiger is he changed the sport, not seeing a lot of top golfers with beer bellies anymore. But you have to wonder what the extreme torque did to his body.
The drugs and off-course antics didn't help.I think the steroids destroyed his body.