Really? On say, a subject like whether he's ever met the man? Whether they have a relationship?
Really? Quoting someone from a rally or an interview.....there's still room for fake news there???
Opinions need a rule book or legal source?
That would have been another place of your failures. Was that response guided from your professionalism? You are just a loser by nature, or hereditary deficiency? Last choice, are you simply an *******? I used no quote marks, and that was from freshman English at WV.
Ok brother....see, we had an agreement that you would STOP with the crazy juice, and I would stop with the "know it all" posts. You didn't live up to your end of the bargain buddy. So......here goes......the pettiness of your attempts to belittle me in this thread, devoid of any real response about the subject on which the thread was created, illuminates the substantial mental struggle you face daily. The overwealming desire to fight these demons of inadequacy have probably long since destroyed the ability for your intellect to differentiate learning from the reinforcement of your personal and emotional vision of the world around you. Furthermore, I believe this suffocating inferiority that has tweaked your vision has equally distorted your ability to separate reality from a form of fantasy in your mind. A infrequent "mental twitch" might, at times, allow true perspective to appear in stark contrast to your manipulated reality, but it is consistently (at least to date) smoothed into the very troubled state of your personal interaction with the world around you. But make no mistake, this mental yogurt that you have created might feel smooth, when dealing with interactions such as this, but it is a very unhealthy diet for ones mind and soul. :wink:
Ok dog, I respect your take on most things, are you basically saying that CNN is using quotations to manipulate Trump's words? That these quotes are edited and used out of context to fit the narrative? (O'Keefe style). And that the timeline is invalid?
Your making a statement in no way constitutes an agreement. That is just a request on your part. It is a false assumption on your part that you can speak for more than yourself. I have no problem treating you or anyone here with a bit of respect. Of course some stupid remarks and stupid people will not be tolerated.
You have made that analysis from a couple exchanges on this board? Just what the *** is it that you claim your professionalism in? Damn, you have fallen off the truck and suffered mentally. I will put you on block and let "The Dog" attempt to work with you." He obviously gets more entertainment out of your demented personality than do I.
Thanks for the digital scavenger hunt, but can't you just answer the question? Besides I just got **** on Darwin and school prayer.
Are you a chicken-**** with Dave too? I have offered you any wager you can stand on the validity of my statement. We can pass the pot thru V and the transcript of proof. I have offered to show transcript on the board if you will show yours. You still have a big mouth and no *** to back your comments up with me. I assume you are equally chicken-**** with Dave.
I'm not sure what exactly it is you want to do with Country's big mouth and *** (your post lacked clarity --- often taught in business English), but could you
I will share a kiss as long as you are not like Triple Prick and want to give me a blow job. That is where I draw the line. No lips on the dick.
You definitely don't have to read in your professional life. Go back and try again. I clearly have nothing to exchange with you and your mental deficiency. You really have problems socially if you choose to pal with Cunty and Triple Prick.
Each time I think you're on board with the board....you take another pull off that crazy juice. Drink up...it pairs well with that mental yogurt. Smooth....that is until you snap.
It was Hillary's official response when asked why she flip flopped on so many issues.
Can I just say that Hillary was a horrible candidate, not a great Senator or Sec of State, and at least as far as you and I are concerned, bury her from discussion as deep as her political career is now?
I think you take what it is that we on the right want and assign inaccurate rationale behind it. I don't really care who does it, or what they stand for, or how they comport themselves. I want D.C. and all involved with that cesspool laid to waste. He is seemingly the person doing a lot towards that goal. Not as effectively as I'd like to see but his assault on Gov't has been joyful to watch.
Sure. Just relentless onslaught.....please. That "victory" party in the rose garden was no holds barred.
Hahaha, no you didn't. You voted for the same person. You voted for a hawkish, narcissistic, flip flopping populist (albeit to a different base) that is a serial liar who after 7 months still can't own up to her faults. Even worse, you voted for someone with zero agenda or plan. Forgive me for calling ******** on your faux outrage over someone like Trump when you voted for her.
Her environmental policy was a big reason I voted for her, the judges she would have appointed the other. Two big issues for me.