Toby Miles'd

WVPATX

Member
Jan 27, 2005
28,197
91
38
Not a smidgen of corruption.

I worked for a company with roughly 200,000 employees, much larger than the IRS. Our IT department kept detailed track of all our assets. They knew each employees laptop, e-mail address,etc. All the data was owned by the company and saved by the company. It's been years and we are just now finding out about Lerner's separate e-mail addresses? They are either thoroughly incompetent or much more likely, thoroughly corrupt.
 

mneilmont

New member
Jan 23, 2008
20,883
166
0
I worked for a company with roughly 200,000 employees, much larger than the IRS. Our IT department kept detailed track of all our assets. They knew each employees laptop, e-mail address,etc. All the data was owned by the company and saved by the company. It's been years and we are just now finding out about Lerner's separate e-mail addresses? They are either thoroughly incompetent or much more likely, thoroughly corrupt.
She has been allowed to be very slippery. I originally wanted her to be given immunity so she could not hide behind self incrimination. Damn, what was I thinking? She is dirty and the committee is going to pursue 'til she traps herself. Then, the system is so crooked that there are some that are 100% guilty and none the less walk. Maybe our system is the best, but it appears to be cracking a bit.
 

dave

Well-known member
May 29, 2001
167,927
721
113
She has been allowed to be very slippery. I originally wanted her to be given immunity so she could not hide behind self incrimination. Damn, what was I thinking? She is dirty and the committee is going to pursue 'til she traps herself. Then, the system is so crooked that there are some that are 100% guilty and none the less walk. Maybe our system is the best, but it appears to be cracking a bit.
Why wouldnt she do this? There were cabinet level execs doing it so why not?