the calling for a friend was a joke cause I know KingofBBN from the political board. I'm not adamant it was a made up story, I was laughing that you took so much stock in whether a nameless assistant actually said something to an espn reporter and your brain can't possibly understand that something might be 'clickbait'.
The word clickbait does not apply. The quote is from a book, not a blog post. Here's a link to ESPN which goes into a little more detail:
http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/...rady-long-worried-being-pushed-bill-belichick
So, it's a book, a biography of Belichick. Ian O'Connor, is a known Patriot's homer - a known Brady homer. He's fairly well respected, for what it's worth, although I don't take any journalism at face value much anymore. This book was very widely discussed when it was released, and no one, far as I can tell or recall, ever doubted the authenticity of the quote/source. No one said "Nah, I don't believe a Pats assistant would say that." All the talk was about whether what the assistant said is right, wrong, crazy or solid. This isn't the first time there have been rumblings out of Boston that Belichick thinks Brady is great, but not the greatest....
Belichick is, I think, the greatest coach in modern history, of any sport. The Patriots have the greatest culture in sports. How many players have stunk, been unproductive, or trouble-makers elsewhere, and go to the Pats and stand out? Then usually they leave and go back to being ordinary. How many coaches or coordinators have done really well there, then leave and are mediocre elsewhere? Even executives - Scott Pioli, the Falcons guy, I forget them all. It's the system, the ecosystem. Belichick is the epicenter of all that. Brady simply has to "do his job." He just has to play quarterback. Which is obvious, but I contrast that with players like Aaron Rogers or Peyton Manning, who essentially have to be everything. Manning always had the burden of knowing an entire organization would rise or fall on his shoulders. Brady doesn't bear that burden. Brady's attributes: real arm talent (at one time), amazing accuracy (the single most important attribute for an NFL qb, IMO) and a total command of the offense. But he doesn't play the position, again in my opinion, as well as Rogers or Manning or Marino, to me the three best quarterbacks I've seen. We have a stupid default analysis in this culture of just counting rings. And giving the QB all the credit. Brady has never made a tackle, sacked a quarterback, run between the tackles, fielded a punt, returned a kickoff, kicked a field goal, intercepted a pass, on and on. I remember looking at the box score of the Seahawks/Patriots Super Bowl. Brady was on the field for 70 of 160 snaps, IIRC.
You want to count rings to determine greatness, I can buy that in basketball - 5 guys, each plays both ways. Maybe a pitcher in baseball should be accorded that respect. No one in football.
Summary (I got distracted midway through this post, so it's scattered): Brady is truly great, who can deny that. I think there are a handful of others who played the position better, that's debateable. What I object to is simply counting rings in order to rank players, which is dumb in football.