Total embarrassment for CNN and 4 anchors/reporters

WVPATX

Freshman
Jan 27, 2005
28,197
91
38
Humiliating.

CNN was forced to correct a story from earlier in the week after four journalists got the story on former FBI chief James Comey dead wrong.

On Tuesday, confident CNN journalists Gloria Borger, Jake Tapper, Brian Rokus, and Eric Lichtblau, ran a report titled, “Comey expected to refute Trump” based on information they got from anonymous sources. They were so confident, that Borger said in a televised appearance at the network, “Comey is going to dispute the president on this point if he’s asked about it by senators, and we have to assume that he will be. He will say he never assured Donald Trump that he was not under investigation, that that would have been improper for him to do so.”

Except, Comey’s opening statement on Thursday didn’t confirm what CNN’s unreliable sources claimed:

"Prior to the January 6 meeting, I discussed with the FBI’s leadership team whether I should be prepared to assure President-Elect Trump that we were not investigating him personally. That was true; we did not have an open counter-intelligence case on him. We agreed I should do so if circumstances warranted.

"During our one-on-one meeting at Trump Tower, based on President Elect Trump’s reaction to the briefing and without him directly asking the question, I offered that assurance.”

So, CNN changed the headline to “Comey unlikely to judge on obstruction” and published a correction:

This article was published before Comey released his prepared opening statement. The article and headline have been corrected to reflect that Comey does not directly dispute that Trump was told multiple times he was not under investigation in his prepared testimony released after this story was published.

ABC News had the same problem, according to The Hill. It, too, issued a correction to one of its stories:

While Comey did stop short of characterizing Trump’s words as obstruction of justice during his testimony Thursday, he in fact testified that he did tell President Trump on three separate occasions that he was not “personally” the subject of a counter-intelligence investigation," reads the update in the third paragraph.

The Washington Free Beacon’s Alex Griswold posted two brilliant screenshots of two totally separate stories from CNN. Wow:

Alex Griswold‏Verified account@HashtagGriswold
Life comes at you at a brisk pace



 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,572
755
113
Comey destroyed the NYTimes and many other media outlets today. He exposed them.
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,572
755
113
Just posted what the NY Times is trying to do to recover.
Not only did they report this but they did it multiple times using that same claim to make it appear more serious. After this false repirt the Wash Post reported based on the NYTimes article and added more and that would have to be false.
 

WVPATX

Freshman
Jan 27, 2005
28,197
91
38
Not only did they report this but they did it multiple times using that same claim to make it appear more serious. After this false repirt the Wash Post reported based on the NYTimes article and added more and that would have to be false.

There has so much false reporting, it is incredible. Ari Feltcher said this evening he knows of several sources that provided the national media leaks of the fact that Trump was not under investigation and NONE was reported. The media is thoroughly corrupt. Print what makes Trump look bad even if it's completely wrong. And don't print or report information that puts Trump in a favorable light.
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,572
755
113
The seemingly obvious unspoken part here is that reporters were running gangbusters with leaks and they were either careless or the leaks came from sources they felt were impeccable.

We now know Comey leaked things through his friends. Is that all he leaked? We know Loretta Lynch was actively protecting Hillary. How far did that go? We quicly blame repirters and regardless of their source they were careless but one has to wonder where the leaks were coming from.
 

Mntneer

Sophomore
Oct 7, 2001
10,192
196
0
Not only did they report this but they did it multiple times using that same claim to make it appear more serious. After this false repirt the Wash Post reported based on the NYTimes article and added more and that would have to be false.

And the left wonders why so many have so little trust in the media. They have blown story after story since the man was sworn in.